UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.        )

Filed by the Registrant  

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  

Check the appropriate box:

 

 Preliminary Proxy Statement  

 Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2))  

 Definitive Proxy Statement  

 Definitive Additional Materials  

 Soliciting Material under§240.14a-12  

NXP Semiconductors N.V.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
 No fee required.
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules14a-6(i)(1) and0-11.
(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)Total fee paid:

 Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 Check box if any part of the fee is offset as providedFee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act RuleRules 0-11(a)(2)14a-6(i)(1) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:

0-11


PRELIMINARY PROXY MATERIALS — SUBJECT TO COMPLETION

LOGO

NOTICE OF AND AGENDA FOR 20202022

ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

April [                  ], 20202022

Dear Shareholders:

I invite you to attend the 20202022 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual General Meeting” or “AGM”) of NXP Semiconductors N.V. (“we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company”), which will be held on Wednesday, May 27, 2020June 1, 2022 at 2:9:00 pm.a.m. Central European Time at the Head Office of the Company, High Tech Campus 60, 5656 AG, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. If meeting restrictions are implemented related to the coronavirus pandemic, we will publish updates on our website at http://investors.nxp.com and will issue a press release.

At the Annual General Meeting, we will discuss, and the Company’s shareholders will vote on, the following items of business:

 

Item 1

 Adoption of the 20192021 statutory annual accounts

Item 2

 Discharge the members of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) for their responsibilities in the fiscalfinancial year ended December 31, 20192021

Item 3

 (Re-)appointmentRe-appointment of the tennine current directors and appointment of one new director named in this proxy statement

Item 4

 Authorization of the Board to issue ordinary shares of the Company (“ordinary shares”) and grant rights to acquire ordinary shares

Item 5

 Authorization of the Board to restrict or excludepre-emption rights accruing in connection with an issue of shares or grant of rights

Item 6

 Authorization of the Board to repurchase ordinary shares

Item 7

 Authorization of the Board to cancel ordinary shares held or to be acquired by the Company

Item 8

 Appointment of Ernst & Young Accountants LLP as our independent auditors for a three-year period, starting with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020

Item 9

Determination of the remuneration of the members and Chairs of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board

Item 10

Amendment of the Company’s Articles of Association

Item 11

Non-binding, advisory vote to approve Named Executive Officer compensation

Item 12

Non-binding, advisory vote on the frequency of future shareholder advisory votes on Named Executive Officer compensation

In addition to the above voting items and as required under Dutch corporate law, we will also have a discussion of the implementation of the remuneration policy for our Board, and a discussion of the dividend and reservation policy.policy and the implementation of the Company’s long-term strategy. We will also consider any other business that properly comes before the Annual General Meeting. None of the proposals require the approval of any other proposal to become effective. We intend that this notice of the Annual General Meeting and the accompanying proxy materials will first be made available to youon our website on or about April [    ], 2020.11, 2022. In accordance with Dutch corporate law and our Articles of Association, the record date for determining those shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual General Meeting has been set at May 4, 2022. We will begin mailing proxy materials to our shareholders on or about May 9, 2022.

At the Annual General Meeting we will also present the consolidated financial statements and independent auditors’ report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.2021. If any other matters properly come before the Annual General Meeting the persons named in the proxy card will vote in their discretion the shares represented by all properly executed proxies. In accordance with Dutch corporate law

Messrs. Kaeser, Goldman and Smitham are retiring from our articlesBoard at the expiration of association,their terms as of the record date for determining those shareholders entitled to noticeend of and to vote at, the Annual General Meeting has been set at April 29, 2020.and are not standing for re-election. Messrs. Kaeser and Goldman joined the Board in connection with NXP’s IPO in 2010 and Mr. Smitham served on the Board since NXP’s merger with Freescale Semiconductor in 2015. These individuals have guided NXP through pivotal milestones in our company’s history, and on behalf of the Board, we want to express our appreciation for their significant contributions to NXP throughout their tenure.


NOTICE OF AND AGENDA FOR 20202022

ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS (continued)

YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. Please read this proxy statement and the accompanying proxy materials. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual General Meeting, please submit your proxy card or voting instructions as soon as possible. On or about April [    ], 2020, we will mail a notice to our shareholders containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials and submit your proxy card or voting instructions. The notice will also include instructions on how you can receive a printed copy of your proxy materials.

By order of the Board of Directors of NXP Semiconductors N.V.,

 

LOGOLOGO

Jennifer B. Wuamett

Secretary

Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to be Held on May 27, 2020June 1, 2022

This proxy statement and the accompanying proxy card are first being made available on or about April [    ], 2020.11, 2022. This proxy statement, and our 20192021 Annual Report on Form 10-K and the 20192021 Statutory Annual Report are available on our website athttp://investors.nxp.com by clicking “Corporate Governance”, then “Annual Meeting”.

We Strongly Encourage You to Sign Up For Electronic Delivery of Proxy Materials

Shareholders may request proxy materials be delivered to them electronically by enrolling at https://enroll.icsdelivery.com/nxpi. Not only will this result in faster delivery of the documents but also allows our shareholders to join us in our efforts to support a sustainable future and mitigate our impact on the environment.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

GENERAL INFORMATION

   1 

VOTING PROCEDURES

   32 

Beneficial Owners

   32 

Shareholders of Record

   32 

Revocability of Proxy

   32 

General Matters

   32 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

   43 

SUSTAINABILITYENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE

   4

Environment

6

Human Capital Management

9

Social Responsibility

16

Health and Safety

18 

ITEM 1: ADOPTION OF THE 20192021 STATUTORY ANNUAL ACCOUNTS

   919 

ITEM  2: DISCHARGE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES IN THE 20192021 FINANCIAL YEAR

   919 

ITEM  3:(RE-)APPOINTMENT OF DIRECTORS

   1020 

Nominees for Director

   1222 

Nominee Skills and Experience

   1727 

Director Independence

   1828 

HOW OUR BOARD GOVERNS AND IS GOVERNED

   1929 

Rules governingGoverning the Board

   1929 

Board Leadership and Role in Risk Oversight

   1929 

Meetings of NXP’s Board

   2030 

NXP’s Board Committees

   2030 

Audit Committee

   2131 

Human Resources and Compensation Committee

   2131 

Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committee

   2232 

Setting and Overseeing Strategy

   2434 

Risk Oversight

   2434 

Board Education

   2536 

HOW OUR DIRECTORS ARE SELECTED AND EVALUATED

   2537 

Consideration of Director Nominees

   2537 

Diversity

   2637 

Board Refreshment

   2637 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

   2638 

HOW OUR DIRECTORS ARE COMPENSATED

   2739

Non-Employee  Director Compensation for 2019

27 

ITEM  4: AUTHORIZATION OF THE BOARD TO ISSUE ORDINARY SHARES AND GRANT RIGHTS TO ACQUIRE ORDINARY SHARES

   28

ITEM 5: AUTHORIZATION OF THE BOARD TO RESTRICT OR EXCLUDEPRE-EMPTION RIGHTS ACCRUING IN CONNECTION WITH AN ISSUE OF SHARES OR GRANT OF RIGHTS

2840 

 

i


TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

 

ITEM 5: AUTHORIZATION OF THE BOARD TO RESTRICT OR EXCLUDE PRE-EMPTION RIGHTS ACCRUING IN CONNECTION WITH AN ISSUE OF SHARES OR GRANT OF RIGHTS

40

ITEM 6: AUTHORIZATION OF THE BOARD TO REPURCHASE ORDINARY SHARES OF THE COMPANY

   2941 

ITEM  7: AUTHORIZATION OF THE BOARD TO CANCEL THE COMPANY’S ORDINARY SHARES HELD OR TO BE ACQUIRED

   2941 

ITEM  8: APPOINTMENT OF ERNST  & YOUNG ACCOUNTANTS LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR A THREE-YEAR PERIOD, STARTING WITH THE 2020 FISCAL YEAR

30

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

30

Auditors’ Fees

30

Audit CommitteePre-Approval Policies

31

ITEM 9: REMUNERATION OF THE MEMBERS AND CHAIRS OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE, THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE, AND THE NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD

31

ITEM 10: AMENDMENT OF THE COMPANY’S ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION

32

ITEM 11:NON-BINDING, ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

   3342 

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

   3342 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

   3544 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

   3746 

Compensation Discussion & Analysis

   3746

Shareholder Engagement and Resutls of 2021 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

48 

Compensation Philosophy

   3850 

Key Practices in Determining Executive Compensation

   39

Proactive Shareholder Engagement

4050 

Key Components of Our Executive Compensation Program

   4052 

Peer Group Analysis and Benchmarking

   4153 

20192021 Compensation Decisions

   4254 

Executive Share Ownership Guidelines

   4660 

Other Practices & Guidelines

   4660 

Employment Arrangements of Named Executive Officers

   4661 

Key Policies and Practices

   4763 

Compensation Practices and Risk

   4863 

Governance

   4964 

Human Resources and Compensation Committee Report

   5065 

Summary Compensation Table

   5166 

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

   5268 

Outstanding Equity Awards atYear-End Table

   5369 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

   5571 

Pension Benefits

   5571 

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control

   5572 

CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure

   5774

Human Resources and Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

74 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

   5875

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

76

Related Party Transactions

76

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

76

THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

77

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

77

Auditors’ Fees

77

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies

77 

 

ii


TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

 

ITEM 12:NON-BINDING, ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE SHAREHOLDER ADVISORY VOTES ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATIONDELINQUENT SECTION 16(A) REPORTS

   59

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

60

Related Party Transactions

60

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

6077 

FUTURE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS FOR THE 20212023 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING

   6178 

OTHER MATTERS

   6178 

APPENDIX A: Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures

   A-1

Forward Looking Statements

A-2 

 

iii


GENERAL INFORMATION

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of NXP Semiconductors N.V. (“we”, “our”, “us”, “NXP” or the “Company”) is providing these proxy materials to you in connection with the Board’s solicitation of proxies to be voted on at NXP’s Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual General Meeting” or the “AGM”) on Wednesday, May 27, 2020.June 1, 2022. We are requesting your vote on the proposals described in this proxy statement.

NXP will pay the entire cost of soliciting proxies. Our directors, officers and employees, without additional compensation, may also solicit proxies or votes in person, by telephone or by electronic communication. We may also reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonableout-of-pocket expenses for forwarding proxy and solicitation materials to beneficial owners of NXP’s common shares,0.20 par value (the “common shares” or “ordinary shares”). In addition, we have retained Mackenzie Partners, Inc. to assist in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of $18,500 plus reasonable expenses.

All shareholders as of the close of business on April 29, 2020May 4, 2022 (the “Record Date”) are authorized to attend the Annual General Meeting and all of NXP’s outstanding common shares owned as of the Record Date may be voted. As of March 29, 2020,24, 2022, there were 279,001,118262,552,688 common shares issued and outstanding and there were no other voting securities outstanding. Persons that wish to attend the AGM must notify the Board of their intention to do so no later than May 20, 2020,25, 2022, one week prior to the date of the meeting, by submitting their name and the number of ordinary shares (beneficially) owned to NXP Semiconductors N.V., High Tech Campus 60, 5656 AG Eindhoven, The Netherlands, Attention: Secretary, or by sending an email with such information to nxp.agm@nxp.com. All attendees must be prepared to provide a valid proof of identity for admittance, such as a driver’s license or passport. The additional items that attendees must bring depends on whether they are shareholders of record, beneficial owners or proxy holders. Shareholders holding their shares through a broker must bring proof of beneficial ownership as of the Record Date, such as an account statement reflecting their share ownership on or prior to the Record Date, a copy of the voting instruction form provided by their broker or similar evidence of ownership in order to obtain admittance to the Annual General Meeting. No cameras or other recording equipment will be allowed in the meeting room. Failure to provide the requested documents at the door or failure to comply with the procedures for the AGM may prevent shareholders from being admitted to the AGM.

Coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak

In view of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and the public health and safety measuresIf meeting restrictions are implemented and recommended in connection with this outbreak, we are considering precautionary measures to limit risks for employees, shareholders and other stakeholders. Given the presence of COVID-19 in the Netherlands, and the regulations restricting public gatherings announced by the Dutch government on March 23, 2020, we currently anticipate that no shareholders or their representatives will attend the AGM in person. It is possible that shareholders who seek to attend the AGM in person will be denied entry. We encourage you to vote your shares prior to the AGM. We kindly refer you to the section “Voting Procedures” for more details on how to exercise your shareholder voting rights.

To allow shareholders to follow the proceedings of the AGM, we will provide an audio- or webcast. Questions related to the agendacoronavirus pandemic, we may determine to implement meeting restrictions or protocols or, if authorized by Dutch corporate law, hold a virtual general meeting of the AGM can be submitted at nxp.agm@nxp.com before May 22, 2020, 10:00 p.m. CET (4 p.m. EST). We aim to answer all the submitted questions during the meeting. In addition, the Board may decide that shareholders that have registered for the meeting or have voted via proxy may ask questions electronically during the meeting. If you wish to ask questions during the meeting, please contact us at nxp.agm@nxp.com before May 22, 2020, 10:00 p.m. CET (4 p.m. EST).

We will continuously monitor for developments and we encourage shareholders to continue to review guidance from government and public health officials as the time for the AGM approaches.shareholders. If you are planning to attend the AGM, please check thehttp://investors.nxp.com website prior to the meeting date and note the attendance requirements in the paragraphs above. We encourage you to monitor our Investor Relations website at http://investors.nxp.com for updated information. We recommend that you check this website for updated information, and please check this website in advance of the AGM to confirm the status of the meeting. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the AGM. We kindly refer to the section titled “Voting Procedures” below for more details on how to exercise your voting rights.

These proxy materials include this proxy statement and the Notice. Also included with these materials is NXP’s 2019 Statutory2021 Annual Report and NXP’s 2019 Annual Report onForm 10-K for for the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

If you requested printed versions of these materials by mail, these materials also include the proxy card or voting instruction form for the Annual General Meeting.

1


GENERAL INFORMATION (continued)

The Board recommends that you vote your shares as follows:

 

“For” the adoption of the 20192021 statutory annual accounts as described in Item 1;

 

“For” the discharge of members of the Board for their responsibilities in the financial year 20192021 as described in Item 2;

 

“For” the(re-)appointmentre-appointment of the tennine directors and appointment of one new director listed in Item 3 to the Board;

 

“For” the authorization of the Board to issue ordinary shares par value0.20 per share, of the Company (“ordinary shares”) and grant rights to acquire ordinary shares as described in Item 4;

 

“For” the authorization of the Board to restrict or excludepre-emption rights accruing in connection with an issue of shares or grant of rights as described in Item 5;

 

“For” the authorization of the Board to repurchase ordinary shares as described in Item 6;

 

“For” the authorization of the Board to cancel ordinary shares held or to be acquired by the Company as described in Item 7;

“For” the appointment of Ernst & Young Accountants LLP as our independent auditors for a three-year period, starting with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020 as described in Item 8;

“For” the determination of the remuneration of the members and Chair of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board as described in Item 9;

“For” the amendment of the Company’s Articles of Association as described in Item 10;

 

“For” the approval, on anon-binding, advisory basis, of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers compensation as described in Item 11; and

“1 year” as the recommendation, on anon-binding, advisory basis, of the frequency of future advisory votes on Named Executive Officer compensation as described in Item 12.8.

 

21


VOTING PROCEDURES

Beneficial Owners

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank, trustee or other nominee, which we refer to as your “broker,” you are considered to be the beneficial owner of these shares, and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker how to vote on your behalf, and you are also invited to attend the Annual General Meeting. Your broker will send you a voting instruction form to direct the broker how to vote your shares. However, sinceSince you are not the shareholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual General Meeting unless you obtain a legal proxy from your broker giving you the right to vote the shares at the Annual General Meeting. The majority of our shareholders are beneficial owners (i.e., hold their shares through a broker rather than directly in their own name). Please refer to the voting instruction form provided by your broker for specific voting procedures.

Shareholders of Record

If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Co., you are considered to be the shareholder of record with respect to those shares and these proxy materials are being sent to you by us. As the shareholder of record, you have the right to vote your proxy directly to NXP by submitting a written proxy or to vote in person at the Annual General Meeting. If you request printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you will receive a proxy card. Please refer to the summary voting instructions and those included on your proxy card. Submitting your vote by proxy will not affect your right to attend the Annual General Meeting or to vote in person.

 

 

InternetYou may vote by proxy on the Internet until 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time (10:00 p.m. Central European Time) on May 26, 2020.31, 2022. The website for Internet voting ishttp://www.proxyvote.com.Easy-to-follow prompts allow you to vote your shares and confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote on the Internet, you can request electronic delivery of future proxy materials.

 

 

TelephoneYou may vote by proxy until 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time (10:00 p.m. Central European Time) on May 26, 202031, 2022 by using the toll-free number listed on your proxy card.Easy-to-follow prompts allow you to vote your shares and confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded.

 

 

MailMark, sign and date your proxy card and mail it to the address listed on the card or NXP at High Tech Campus 60, 5656 AG, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.Netherlands, Attention: Secretary. In order for your vote to be counted, we must receive your proxy card no later than the daytwo days before the Annual General Meeting.

Revocability of Proxy

If you are a beneficial owner of shares, please refer to the instructions provided by your broker regarding how to change your vote. In addition, if you have obtained a legal proxy from your broker giving you the right to vote your shares in person, you may change your vote by attending the Annual General Meeting and voting again in person.

If you are a shareholder of record, you may revoke a proxy given to a representative of NXP in any of the following ways:

 

by sending a written notice of revocation to NXP at High Tech Campus 60, 5656 AG Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Attention: Secretary, which notice must be received before shares of such shareholder are voted at the Annual General Meeting; or

 

by properly submitting a later-dated, new proxy, which must be received before shares of such shareholder are voted at the Annual General Meeting (in which case only the later-dated proxy is counted and the earlier proxy is revoked); or

 

by attending the Annual General Meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the Annual General Meeting will not, however, in and of itself, constitute a vote or revocation of a prior proxy.

General Matters

Pursuant to Dutch law, (i) common shares which are represented by “brokernon-votes” (i.e. common shares held by brokers which are represented at the Annual General Meeting but which the broker isbrokers are not empowered to vote on a particular proposal) and (ii) common shares represented at the Annual General Meeting, but which abstain from voting on any matter, are not included in the determination of the common shares voting on such matter, and are only counted for quorum purposes.

3


VOTING PROCEDURES (continued)

If you do not submit specific voting instructions to your broker, your broker will not have the ability to vote your shares in connection with proposals which are considered“non-discretionary” items for which brokerage firms require your voting instructions to vote your shares.

2


VOTING PROCEDURES (continued)

Each share will be entitled to one vote. According to the Company’s Articles of Association, all votes will be tabulated by the chairmanchair of the Annual General Meeting who will countdetermines the method of voting, establishes the outcome of the votes determinetaken, and determines the existence of a quorum and validity of proxies and ballots, and certifycertifies the results of the voting.

The adoption of resolutions at the Annual General Meeting shall require that at least one/third (1/3)the majority of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s issued share capital is present or represented, excluding shares for which no vote can be cast pursuant to article 29, paragraph 2 of the Company’s articlesArticles of association.Association. Unless otherwise provided for in this proxy, resolutions can be adopted with a simple majority of votes cast.

Other than the proposals described in this proxy statement and matters incident to the conduct of the Annual General Meeting, we do not expect any matters to be presented for a vote at the Annual General Meeting. However, if you grant a proxy and additional matters are properly presented for a vote at the Annual General Meeting, the persons named as proxy holders, Jennifer B. Wuamett or Jean A.W. Schreurs,Timothy Shelhamer, will have the discretion to vote your shares on these additional matters. If for any unforeseen reason one or more of our nominees is not available as a candidate for director, the persons named as proxy holders will vote your proxy for such other candidate or candidates as may be nominated by the Board.Board and presented to the Annual General Meeting in accordance with Dutch law.

We have electedexpect to provide access to our proxy materials over the Internet, and accordingly will send the Notice to our shareholders of record and beneficial owners. The Notice contains instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a paper copy, how you may request access to proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically on an ongoing basis, and how to submit your proxy electronically over the Internet or by mail.

We will announce preliminary voting results at the Annual General Meeting. Final voting results will be published in a Current Report on Form8-K filed with the SEC within four business days of the Annual General Meeting. If the final voting results are not available within four business days after the Annual General Meeting, we will provide the preliminary results in the Current Report on Form8-K and the final results in an amendment to the Current Report on Form8-K within four business days after the final voting results are known to us.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

We areNXP Semiconductors N.V. is the parent company of the NXP group. We are a holding company and ourOur only material asset is our direct ownership of 100% of the share capital of NXP B.V., a Dutch private company with limited liability (besloten vennootschap met beperkte aansprakelijkheid).

We were incorporated in the Netherlands as a Dutch private company with limited liability (besloten vennootschap met beperkte aansprakelijkheid) under the name KASLION Acquisition B.V. on August 2, 2006. On May 21, 2010, we converted into a Dutch public company with limited liability (naamloze vennootschap) and changed our name to NXP Semiconductors N.V. In August 2010, we listed our common shares on the Nasdaq Global Select Market (“Nasdaq”).

We are subject to various corporate governance requirements and best practice codes, the most relevant being those in the Netherlands and the United States. The current Dutch Corporate Governance Code (the “DCGC”), dated December 8, 2016, replaced the former 2008 code and applies to all Dutch companies listed on a government-recognized stock exchange, whether in the Netherlands or elsewhere. The codeDCGC is based on a “comply or explain” principle. Accordingly, companies are required to disclose in their annual reports filed in the Netherlands whether or not they are complyingcomply with the various rules of the Dutch corporate governance codeDCGC and if they do not comply with those provisions, to give the reasons therefore. The codeDCGC contains principles and best practice provisions for managing boards, supervisory boards (which also apply to thenon-executive members ofone-tier boards), shareholders and general meetings of shareholders, financial reporting, auditors, disclosure, compliance and enforcement standards.

Our long-term strategy is to maximize value for our shareholders and other stakeholders and create a strong cash flow generation by driving relative market share leadership with profitable growth at 1.5 times the semiconductor market and exceeding customer expectations. We are committed to innovating for a better tomorrow for our customers, employees,team members, communities, and society as a whole. Our purpose is bringing together bright minds to create breakthrough technologies that make the connected world better, safer and goal is to provide Secure Connections for a Smarter World, a mission inspired by our customer-focused passion to win. In order to do so, we place five key elements high on our culture agenda: (i) raising the bar, (ii) engaging curiosity, (iii) taking initiative, (iv) working together and (v) developing deep core competence. These values define uniquely who we are, and what we aspire to, as an organization. They are the guiding principles that we believe will help us and our employees succeed. They inform the decisions we make and the actions we take—individually and collectively—every day in order to drive market success.more secure. The Board strives foris committed to maintaining a culture focuseddialogue with shareholders to ensure that they understand our differentiated strategy and business model and have an opportunity to discuss and engage on long-term value creationa broad range of topics, including our strategy. The Board will review the implementation of our strategy at the AGM.

We conduct our operations in accordance with internationally accepted principles of good governance and believes that these values enable us to reach that goal.best practice, while ensuring compliance with the corporate governance requirements applicable in the countries in which we operate:

 

4We have a transparent corporate structure, with approval rights of our general meeting of shareholders for any significant change in the identity or nature of our Company or business;

Each share of our common stock confers the right to cast one vote at the general meeting of shareholders;

3


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (continued)

 

Our directors are appointed for one year terms;

We do not have a poison pill in place;

We only have outstanding common stock, and no preference shares are issued, and such shares cannot be issued without majority shareholder approval;

Our share capital only exists of common shares and preference shares, no priority or other shares with special voting rights are included in our share capital;

Any issuance of common or preference shares, for any reason, is subject to the approval of the general meeting of shareholders; and

We allow special meetings of our shareholders to be called upon the written request of shareholders holding at least 10% of our outstanding voting stock.

The Board, as well as the management team and the NXP Ethics Committee, promote openness and engagement through SpeakUp, a SpeakUp grievance mechanism.confidential reporting system described in more detail below. Furthermore, we maintain a Code of Conduct in order to promote a culture of good governance, excellence and consistency that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees and complies with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the rules thereunder, as well as applicable Nasdaq listing standards. A copy of the Code of Conduct is available on our Investor Relations website athttp://investors.nxp.com under the “Corporate Governance” section. We will post any amendments to, or waivers from, our Code of Conduct (to the extent applicable to any director or any of our executive officers) toon this website.

The Code of Conduct outlines our general commitment to be a responsible social partner and the way in which we attempt to interact with our stakeholders, including shareholders, suppliers, customers, employees and the market. The Code of Conduct expresses our commitment to an economically, socially and ethically sustainable way of working. It covers our policy on a diverse array of subjects, including corporate gifts, privacy, child labor, International Labor Organization conventions, trade compliance, working hours, sexual harassment, free-market competition, bribery and the integrity of financial reporting.

The Code of Conduct is built around the campaign “Know Right, Do Right” and consists of a framework of a variety of controls, a strictnon-retaliation policy, a training program for employees, the SpeakUp telephone line where people can report potential issues in a confidential manner, a confidential investigation process, risk assessments, background checks and audits. Any reports related to the Code of Conduct are brought to the attention of our Ethics Committee to ensure that all reports are properly investigated and addressed. Each quarter the Ethics Committee communicates to the Audit Committee a summary of all reports and investigations.

ENVIRONMENT, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG)

Enabling a better, safer, more secure, and sustainable world

As a company focused on innovation, we are known for our ability to solve problems and address societal challenges, and we have continued to advance the scope of our ESG efforts to align with new challenges and opportunities. We recognize that stakeholder interest and expectations regarding our ESG efforts have evolved considerably over the last fifteen years. Today, we are focused on integrating ESG into our business and leveraging our technology to enable a more sustainable world.

In our view, the rapid pace of technological change is not without its challenges, but we look to the future with optimism. We believe in furthering our legacy of sustainable innovation and will continue to apply our technologies in ways that help advance global sustainability. We embrace the opportunity to inspire people and shape the future while also positioning ourselves for sustained success.

We report our progress annually in our corporate sustainability report, which includes more details about our commitment to sustainable practices, products that support a sustainable future, and transparency and accountability in our business and supply chain for focused ESG topics. Our corporate sustainability report is available on our website (http://www.nxp.com/CSR). The corporate sustainability report is expressly not part of this proxy statement.

4


ENVIRONMENT, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) (continued)

2021 ESG Highlights

LOGO

Our ESG Goals

Our ESG mission is to enable a better, safer, more secure, and sustainable world through innovation. That mission has given rise to a series of aspirational goals that inform our efforts and enable us to gauge our performance and celebrate our accomplishments.

LOGO

 

5


SUSTAINABILITYENVIRONMENT, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) (continued)

At

ESG Performance & Reward Program

Beginning in 2022, NXP we believehas incorporated Sustainability goals into our annual incentive plan. We anticipate that a commitment toincluding key sustainability is a criticalgoals as part of our mission to deliver innovative solutions that accelerate our customers’ success and address stakeholder needs. We consider sustainability issues an integral partannual incentive plan will enhance team member accountability regarding key aspects of our business oversightperformance and are proactive towards developing products that support a sustainable future, drive transparency and accountability in our operations and supply chain, and that mitigate our impact on the environment.efforts to achieve continuous improvement.

We report on our progress in these efforts and include more details about the ways we are committed to sustainable practices and supporting our global community in our annual sustainability report. Our corporate responsibility report is publicly available at our website nxp.com, by clicking on “Company”, then “Corporate Responsibility”.Environment

Greener productsIn the same way that we commit ourselves to delivering products that can improve life, we commit ourselves toOptimizing our resource use and consumption, minimizing our impact on the environment. Our chips can make systems smarterwaste, and contribute to energy savings in multiple ways. In many cases, our chips are designed to consume less power themselves than earlier chips. In other cases, our chips are tailored to minimize the energy consumption in theend-products they are embedded in. Below are some examples of how our products are minimizing the impact on the environment.continuously improving

 

1.
Long-Term Ambitions

Carbon

Neutral by

2035

Smart mobilityMinimize Impact on

Global Water

Supplies

Develop Collaborative

Circular Economy

Solutions

Reduce Use of

Targeted

Chemicals of

Concern

Collaborate with our

Suppliers to Reduce their Environmental Footprint

Battery

2027 Mid-Term Goals

35% Reduction in Scope

1 & 2 Carbon Footprint

(2021 Baseline)

50%

Renewable

Energy Use

60% of

Wastewater

Recycled

90% Waste

Recycled

Work with Our Supply Chain to

Reduce Impacts and Measure

Our Portion of their Carbon

Footprint

2021 Environmental Performance

11% Decrease in

Normalized Scope 1 & 2

Emissions from 2020

31%

Renewable

Energy Use

11% Decrease in

Normalized Water

Consumption from 2020

76% Waste

Recycled

Successfully Identified

Alternatives to Using

Phthalates in Dicing Tapes

As an environmentally responsible manufacturer committed to continuous improvement, we strive to optimize our use of natural resources, minimize releases to the environment, and achieve operational efficiencies. We maintain and implement an environmental management in electric carssystem and several programs to support these objectives. In accordance with criteria from the International Organization of Standardization (ISO), our environmental management system is certified to ISO 14001 at all of our manufacturing sites.

Emissions

Our manufacturing sites generate Scope 1 (direct) and Scope 2 (indirect) Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions. We measure our carbon footprint according to the GHG Protocol, a core strengthset of NXP. The progressive growthinternationally recognized standards for quantifying and reporting GHG emissions. We report on all three of the numbersprotocol’s defined categories: Scope 1 (direct emissions), Scope 2 (indirect emissions, owned), and partial Scope 3 (business travel and product transportation).

Electricity, Perfluorinated Compounds (“PFCs”), and heat transfer fluids (“HTFs”) are essential to semiconductor manufacturing. We have set reduction goals for both Scope 1 & 2 because it is not currently feasible to eliminate these sources of electrical vehiclesemissions from our production processes. To keep ourselves accountable, our reduction goals are aligned with the Science Based Targets initiative, which accepted our application in the world demands for optimization of battery management. Our smart chips can make a difference in battery management, leading to significant power savings and extension of car battery lifetimes.

Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), ranging from simple features like cruise control, up to fully self-driving cars, have a huge impact on fuel consumption. Theon-board systems are more capable than humans to smoothen the ride and save fuel. Speed limits are automatically respected, andcar-to-car communication systems help avoid traffic congestion. NXP’s experiments with multiple trucks showed spectacular fuel saving results.

The application of ADAS technology is independent of the engine type of the vehicle: conventional ICE, hybrid or fully electric.March 2022.1

 

2.1

Wireless communication infrastructureScience-based targets provide guidance to companies regarding their efforts to reduce emissions in line with goals of the Paris Agreement.

Base-stations for wireless communication transmit huge amounts of data over long distances. The power amplifiers and antennas together typically consume kWatts of electric power per station. The upcoming superfast fifth generation mobile internet standard 5G is expected to further boost energy consumption, as many more base-stations will be required in a 5G network. NXP already delivers very energy efficient power amplifiers and beamforming antenna systems for 5G.

3.

Microcontrollers

OurLow-power i.MX microcontrollers offer the lowest power consumption in the industry; only 15 microWatt in deep sleep mode. OurLow-power Graphic Processing Units (GPU’s) expand the battery lifetimes of consumer wearables. NXP’s advanced application processors enable complex and fast computing “at the edge” (in the immediate vicinity) of IoT devices, like camera’s, wearable devices, domestic appliances, industry equipment, contributing to energy saving as well as the safety and security ofend-users.

Edge computing means that more and more of the smart connected devices around us can do complex data processing (e.g. artificial intelligence) by themselves, making vulnerable and power consuming data transfer to the cloud unnecessary. NXP’s Secure Edge Computing solutions offer a range of processing options coupled to connectivity and security to ensure that a wide range of solutions are available from our i.MX and RT families. With low, mid and high-end computing processors and crossover processors we offer the ability to address secure edge artificial intelligence/machine learning systems in the industrial, IoT and automotive markets. Data from end nodes, gateways and mobile devices are pre-processed at the edge prior to that data then being either re-issued to the same end node or others locally or passed on to data centers for combining with other end nodes at the edge.

Artificial intelligence (AI), running on our microcontrollers will make many electric appliances smarter and more energy efficient. Machine learning, sub-domain of AI, will make machines and industrial robots much more adaptive to use-patterns and circumstances, reducing waste and saving energy.

4.

Building control systems

According to the International Energy Agency, 35% of final energy consumption is used in buildings; more than in transportation, and more than in the industry. Vast amounts of energy can be saved by the use of smart control systems forair-conditioning, heating, lighting and other interior climate provisions. By adapting the equipment’s usage to human presence, activity, and preference settings, the energy consumption can be decreased significantly compared to the“always-on” setting often applied today. Also,

 

6


SUSTAINABILITYENVIRONMENT, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) (continued)

 

Artificial Intelligence can make these systems self-learning, further minimizing energy usage fully autonomously. NXP developsIn 2021, the systems and componentsdemand for our products increased 22% compared to further “smarten” buildings and homes.

Product stewardshipOur goal is to provide environmentally preferred products that not only meet both regulatory requirements and specific restrictions on hazardous substances and minerals but to also proactively restrict and phase out additional hazardous substances that are not in legal scope. We maintain a catalog of restricted substances and product compliance data that are made available to2020. That meant our customers upon request. We adhere to global restricted substance regulations, including the European regulation regarding the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (“REACH”)electricity, PFC2, and HTF consumption increased, however, our normalized Scope 1 & 2 emissions decreased by 11% from 2020. Since 2011, we have lowered normalized emissions by 39% and absolute emissions by 28%.

LOGO

Market-based emissions reflect actual data directly from energy providers.

Energy

Primary sources of energy for our manufacturing, testing, and office sites come from the Restrictionelectrical grid, and purchase of Hazardous Substances (“RoHS”) “Recast” Directive, as amended by Directive (EU) 2015/863. We regularly participate in industry-wide reviews and discussions to assist in leading the development of industry standards.renewable energy when available.

Electricity

Our policyproduct demand increased by 22% in 2021. As a result, our absolute electricity consumption increased by 5%, while our normalized electricity decreased by 14% compared to 2020. In 2021, 31% of our overall electricity use was from renewable energy sources. We continue to look for new ways to increase our use of renewable energy sources through power purchase agreements.

LOGO

2

We use Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2006 for PFC reporting, but will transition to IPCC 2019 in 2022.

7


ENVIRONMENT, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) (continued)

Water

Since drastically reducing the amount of water used within our manufacturing processes is not currently feasible, we anticipate that our demand for water will increase in line with our increases in production. To reduce the amount of incoming water we consume, we focus on a mid-term goal of increasing our water recycling rate to ethically source minerals60% by 2027.

In 2021, the demand for our products increased 22% compared to 2020. As a result of this demand, our absolute water consumption increased by 9% compared to 2020, however, our normalized water consumption decreased by 11% from responsible suppliers2020. Our water conservation kept our absolute water-consumption level low and helped us achieve a 14% decrease in normalized water consumption compared to ensure2011. Our rate of water recycling has increased by 17 percentage points, and in 2021 we recycled 45% of our supply chain does not contributewater.

LOGO

Waste

NXP continues to human rights abuses. Our products may contain 3TG (tin, tantalum, tungsten, and gold), which are necessaryactively evolve our approach to the functionality or productionsourcing, consumption, and disposal of the products. We have implemented due diligence measures to conformmaterials critical to the Organization for EconomicCo-operationmanufacturing and Development Due Diligence (“OECD”) Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas. We have established strong management systems for 3TG supply chain due diligence, identified and assessed 3TG risks in our supply chain, designed and implemented strategies to respond to identified risks, and we report on 3TG supply chain due diligence activities annually. In 2018, our suppliers identified 255 smelters or refiners that provide materials likely to be incorporated into the functionalitytesting of our products. All smelters identified were compliant withIn 2021, our production increased by 22% from 2020 and, as a third-party audit program (conformant)result, our total waste generation increased by 18%. For three years in a row, 100% of the smelters within our supply chain are certified conflict free. We are extending the scopeIn 2021, we recycled 76% of our due diligence procedurestotal waste (non-hazardous and hazardous), an increase of 7 percentage points from 2020.

LOGO

8


ENVIRONMENT, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) (continued)

Human Capital Management

Our Team Members: The Heart of NXP

At NXP, our diverse and talented team members drive the innovation that sets our company apart and fuels our success in the market.

Our Purpose

Bringing together bright minds to include additional mineralscreate breakthrough technologies that may originate from conflict-affected or high-risk areas.make the connected world better, safer, and more secure.

Respect for human rightsAs partOur Values

Our values are our fundamental beliefs and guiding principles. They speak to how we operate, how we engage, develop, and value our team members, and push the boundaries of creativity and innovation. We hold ourselves accountable to our commitment to respect and protect human rights, we seek to uphold the highest standardsvalues by including them in our labor practices. Our company policies adhereperformance evaluation process.

LOGO

We have a long history of empowering our team members to applicable local labor laws, are consistent with both the United Nations Global Compactdevelop their skill sets and the International Labor Organization (“ILO”) core labor principles and conformexpand their capabilities. When it comes to the NXP Auditable Standards (standards which are stricter than the Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct). We conduct annual risk assessments in our manufacturing sites to identify and mitigate labor and human rights risks that could arise. We also participate in third party internal audits to ensure policies and practices are aligned with local legislation and the NXP auditable standards. Our Human Rights Policy includes clear statements about our commitment to labor and human rights in which we do not tolerate harassment in the workplace, involuntary labor, child labor, payment of fees, withholding of personal documentation and excessive working hours. We also look to foster open communication and provide employees access to the NXP Global Speak Up hotline. In November 2016, the Thomson Reuters Foundation awarded NXP with the Stop Slavery Award. NXP was chosen because of its deep commitment to the fight to end modern slavery. Since 2012, the company has made this a key corporate initiative through its own operations and across the supply chain.

Investment in human capitalNXP invests in the engagement and development, ofwe want our currentteam members to grow, progress, and future employeesadvance across job types, functions, organizations, geographies, and levels at a pace that is unique to ensure we have the talent to deliver our shortthem.

Our Policies and long term strategy. Programs

Across the globe, we have policies and programs to find and maintainretain the best talent possible, including robust employeepossible. We focus on driving team member engagement; building thought leadership; embracing diversity, equality and inclusion; providing competitive and fair compensation and benefits; enabling talent development programs, a strong commitmentand growth opportunities; investing in future talent; focusing on team member retention; and giving back to our university internship program, and collaborative engagement with research universities. communities.

We consistently monitor our talent pool, assess turnover trends, closely,and analyze team member feedback. In addition, we are committed to having a diverse workforce, as evidenced by the many advancements we’ve made in this space over the last 18 months. We are progressing along our journey to further foster a progressive and inclusive culture for our talented team members across the world.

9


ENVIRONMENT, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) (continued)

Workforce Demographics

NXP’s workforce includes direct labor (“DL”) and indirect labor (“IDL”). DL are those team members directly involved in manufacturing our products and typically work in our factories, while IDL consists of individual contributors, managers, and executives in other functions such as research and development (“R&D”) and selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”). At December 31, 2021, we had approximately 31,000 employees, which includes approximately 1,500 employees in our joint venture. Our NXP global workforce spans three regions encompassing 30+ countries and includes approximately 9,300 team members dedicated to research and development of our products and solutions.

LOGOLOGO

Focusing on Team Member Retention

In 2021, workplaces across the globe were met with the challenge of team member turnover, with terms like “The Great Resignation” and “The Big Quit” coming to life to describe the economic trend that showed itself via mass voluntary resignations.

While it’s true that NXP saw a year-over-year increase in team member turnover, we also saw voluntary turnover stabilize in March 2021, and has remained relatively flat, and since down over the second half of 2021 versus the first half of 2021.

LOGO

To address concern for retaining talent, we launched several initiatives and committed resources devoted to retention actions for strategic roles and top-performing talent, as well as gatherprograms targeting all team members, including global flexible work arrangements, continuous focus on well-being, consistent communications, and business updates. We also expanded our hiring practices and focused attention on our global manufacturing team members.

Driving Team Member Engagement

Engaging, developing, and valuing our team members is how we create long-term value for our stakeholders.

Engaging Team Members through Surveys

To assess and improve team member engagement, NXP regularly conducts our global Winning Culture Survey. We invite NXP team members to share their level of agreement on a variety of factors, including engagement, strategy, culture, leadership, continuous improvement, collaboration, execution, accountability, work environment, and support. Surveys are administered by a third party to ensure confidentiality.

10


ENVIRONMENT, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) (continued)

The results of our end of 2020 survey tell us that our team members are engaged, feel pride in the company, and believe that NXP is a great place to work, among other things:

     
Response Rate Engagement Great Place to Work Proud Valued
    

90%

 84% 82% 89% 81%

Insights from our survey equip us to improve the team member experience and work on our policies and processes. We’ve converted some team member feedback into company and/or country-specific programs and made updates to our tools and resources. This includes focusing on the well-being of our team members and introducing global flexible work arrangements to help team members achieve greater work/life balance.

External Awards & Recognition

NXP is honored to have received external awards and recognition for our commitment to human capital development. Some of the honors received include:

Austria:

For the fourth year in a row (2022, 2021, 2020 and 2019), NXP received the Leading Employer Award in Austria – and was rated the number two semiconductor company in Austria by the Leading Employer Institute.

NXP was recognized for its strong mentoring efforts and active participation in the Business Cross Mentoring program in Austria, which supports women who are high-potential managers in technical domains with growing their skills and network.

The Netherlands: For the second year in a row (2021 and 2020), NXP has been awarded the title of Most Attractive Employer in the Netherlands by Randstad; in 2019, NXP was named a runner-up for the award.

Mainland China and Taiwan:

NXP was one of only seven companies to receive the 2021 Industrial Relations Excellence Award in Taiwan, recognizing our collaborative and healthy working relationship with the union representing our employees.

NXP received the 2021 Charity Award from the Economic Affairs Authority.

Thailand: NXP was recognized by the Thailand Ministry of Public Health for integrating additional measures of health and disease prevention in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

United States:

NXP was named a 2021 Best Place to Work in Austin by Comparably, which is given to companies based on team member satisfaction ratings for leadership, diversity, meetings and more.

NXP was named a 2021 JUST Company by JUST Capital, which ranks the performance of Americas’ largest publicly traded companies on issues that matter most in defining just business behavior today. To finalize the list, JUST Capital tracked, analyzed, and ranked 954 companies, covering 20 issues and 330 unique data points. NXP ranked 115 of the total companies and 6th of the 31 semiconductor and equipment companies.

Building Thought Leadership

Our talented, innovative team members accelerate breakthroughs that help advance our world.

11


ENVIRONMENT, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) (continued)

Investing in R&D

Through our innovations, NXP products help to build future advancements in automotive, communication infrastructure, industrial, mobile, smart city, and smart home technologies. We design purpose-built, rigorously tested technologies that enable devices to sense, think, connect and act intelligently to improve people’s daily lives.

Developing Thought Leaders

We are committed to building thought leaders, which is evidenced by nearly 9,300 team members (representing 31% of our IDL workforce) who are specifically dedicated to R&D. Through broad exposure to job-based development activities, we have been able to advance 11% of these team members in 2021 through internal promotions. In addition, we hired 1,523 new R&D team members, named 26 technical directors, seven program directors and four new fellows. Our consistent focus on R&D and innovation resulted in NXP being awarded more than 1,150 individual patents during 2021.

Embracing Diversity, Equality, and Inclusion

At NXP, we value diversity, equality and inclusion, and respect the unique talents, experiences, backgrounds, cultures, and ideas of our team members. We invite everyone to be their authentic selves at work, without exception. This is what makes us who we are at NXP. As an ongoing demonstration of our commitment, we invest in initiatives and resources to drive cultural awareness across the company, spearheaded by our Head of Diversity, Equality and Inclusion (“DE&I”).

NXP made significant progress on our DE&I journey in 2021. We started the year with increased transparency of our team member demographics by communicating our global gender and U.S. race and ethnicity representation data in our 2020 Corporate Sustainability Report, and defined internal goals to increase representation over time. Additionally, our Head of DE&I met with each member of our Management Team, as well as the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors to discuss the 2021 DE&I strategy and plans. Our progress toward our representation goals was regularly reviewed with these leaders throughout the year.

To help define our aspirational and interim representation goals, we developed a tool to analyze employeeour representation results in comparison to our hiring and attrition trends and developed internal dashboards to help track progress towards our goals.

When it comes to hiring, we began requiring diverse candidate slates for management roles and increased our Employee Referral Program award amounts when qualified women or, in the United States, under-represented minorities are hired via a referral for positions in specific countries.

To gain a better understanding of what’s contributing to the attrition of women globally and minority team members within the United States, we implemented an exit interview process where team members at specified job levels are given the opportunity to provide direct feedback to createthe Head of DE&I prior to exiting the company.

Additionally, we participated in the Bloomberg Gender Equality Index for the first time to demonstrate our commitment to promoting gender equality and an inclusive workplace, to help establish a robust employee focused environment.comparable data set within our industry.

We also announced our global Diversity, Equality and Inclusion Policy, which outlines our key belief that every team member should be treated with respect. We do not tolerate discrimination based on race, national origin, social origin, color, gender, religion, age, pregnancy, sexual orientation, physical or mental disability, or political affiliation, among other things. Nor do we tolerate physical, verbal, sexual or psychological harassment, bullying, abuse, or threats of any kind. We have also increased our DE&I communications and programming, including the launch of Inclusion Insights – a strongnew practice of starting our formal meetings with a brief discussion focused on inclusion, regular contributions to our weekly company-wide newsletter, and through our Inclusive Language Project and Employee Resource Group (ERG) engagement activities.

We increased our ERG footprint by establishing a new chapter of Equal—our LGBTQ ERG in Europe and created two new ERGs: No eXtra Planet (which focuses on environmental sustainability) and Interconnection (which supports team members in Europe from multicultural backgrounds). We now have eight primary ERGs, with representation in Asia, Europe, Mexico, and the United States.    

12


ENVIRONMENT, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) (continued)

Approach

NXP’s approach to diversity, equality and inclusion is centered around leadership commitment and accountability; building and sustaining a qualified, diverse talent pipeline and equitable processes; and fostering an inclusive culture and a sense of belonging to attract and retain the best talent by welcoming and embracing our team members’ diversity and fostering respect for everyone’s differences, leveraging the diversity of thought and life experiences and cultivating a collaborative work environment where team members feel valued and are comfortable being their true selves.

We also support and adhere to all diversity-related legal and compliance requirements, which vary by country. In the United States, for example, we partner with an outside law firm to achieve these goals.

Representation Goals

To support our diversity, equality and inclusion approach and demonstrate our commitment to ongoingtransparency and accountability, we have established aspirational 2025 DE&I goals to improve our gender representation globally and minority race and ethnicity representation in the United States.

We continue to focus on hiring, development, and retention across all global sites to meet our 2025 representation goals among our team member population:

 
2025 Diversity, Equality and Inclusion Goals
    

40% Women in

Overall Global

Workforce

 30% Women in Global Indirect Labor Workforce 

20% Women in

Executive Positions

 25% Women in R&D Positions 50% Minority Representation in the United States
 
 
 
2021 Diversity, Equality and Inclusion Performance
    

37%

 24% 13% 17% 49%

In a competitive hiring market, our overall team member population grew by nearly 8% compared to 2020. Of this increased population, with the exception of the representation of women in executive positions, we saw a 1% increase for each of the goals in 2021 when compared to 2020. While we present gender representation headcount (HC) data by men and women, we acknowledge this is not fully encompassing of all gender identities.

LOGO

Gender Representation

At NXP, women represent 37% of our global workforce (up 1% year-over-year), and we continue to strive for noticeable improvements in hiring women across all global sites. Additionally, we are committed to increasing, developing, and promoting more women into technical and leadership positions within our organizations.

13


ENVIRONMENT, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) (continued)

To that end, we monitor gender statistics globally, across all roles, and look for continuous improvements, which include an evaluation of the practices at the country level. Each country leadership team focuses on how to ensure we are making improvements, where needed.

Race and Ethnicity Representation

In the United States, we monitor race and ethnicity representation to ensure we are attracting, retaining and developing diverse team members, acknowledging the unique nature of the United States workforce dynamics.

A breakdown of NXP’s United States population, as of December 31, 2021:

Race and Ethnicity (United States Only)

Representation

White (Not Hispanic or Latino)

51

Asian (Not Hispanic or Latino)

20

Hispanic or Latino

15

Undeclared

7

Black or African American (Not Hispanic or Latino)

5

Two or More Races (Not Hispanic or Latino)

1

Native American or Alaska Native (Not Hispanic or Latino)

0.6

Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (Not Hispanic or Latino)

0.2

Providing Competitive and Fair Compensation and Benefits

NXP’s competitive compensation and benefits programs are designed to attract the best talent and drive the best performance across all areas of our diverse workforce.

Compensation

NXP provides team members with total rewards packages consisting of base salary, short-term incentives, and equity-based long-term incentives for some team members as well as competitive benefits aimed at supporting team members’ financial, physical, and mental well-being.

Rewarding performance is a critical foundation for our overall program. NXP is committed to managing all reward-based compensation programs, including merit increases, annual incentive program (AIP) payouts and long-term incentive awards, to deliver on our pay-for-performance philosophy.

NXP has policies and procedures in place to promote pay equity, and diligent reviews are performed twice a year alongside the rewards processes. We also developed a proactive process to evaluate each reward-based compensation program in real-time and provide leaders with feedback to ensure fair and equitable compensation while decisions are being made. We continue to use analytical tools to assess potential compensation recommendations that need further review prior to these recommendations becoming effective in order make appropriate adjustments and promote pay equity. We use this process globally to evaluate these compensation-related decisions based on a variety of factors, including gender and, in the United States, race and ethnicity.

NXP relies on third-party data to establish fair, equitable and competitive compensation and benefits programs. We then empower leaders to recognize both individual and team accomplishments through a variety of compensation programs. Rewards decisions are linked to a team member’s performance evaluation. A formal assessment of both specific achievements, and the individual’s demonstrated behaviors—consistent with our values—to deliver those achievements, is performed annually.

Benefits

NXP helps our team members maintain their health and financial well-being by supplying benefits that may include an employee stock purchase plan, life insurance, business travel accident insurance, personal accident insurance, paid maternity and paternal leave, personal time off, tuition reimbursement and other employee assistance programs.

14


ENVIRONMENT, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) (continued)

In addition, we offer a global Flexible Work Arrangement program, which offers eligible team members the ability to work a combination of on-site and remotely. Although our way of working focuses on meaningful face-to-face interactions, we have incorporated flexibility into our work arrangements in a way that allows us to maintain the focus on strong and effective teamwork, collaboration, and community.

In some countries, we also support part-time work schedules, helping to support the overall well-being—and greater work-life balance—for our team members.

Enabling Talent Development & Growth Opportunities

NXP has a long history of empowering our team members to develop their skill sets and expand their capabilities.

NXP is committed to continuous learning, including mechanisms for learning fromthrough on-the-job development experiences (70%), through others (20%), and through formal training opportunitieseducation (10%). By utilizing the 70/20/10 model, learning can achieve new levels through experience, collaboration, and a variety of on-the-job development experiences. Our development programs begin with Day 1 Orientations and continue throughout the lifecycle of employment with regular and ongoing programs for the growth and development of key talent.education. Using a blend ofinternally-designed internally designed and externally-sourcedexternally sourced courses and learning resources, we bringoffer our team members around the globe a variety of training programs that provide real-time learning to our employees real-timeopportunities in support of key business processes, requirements, &and initiatives. We also provide a complete library of on-demand skills development and microlearning resources to all of our non-factory populations. And we support continuing educational endeavors by providing tuition assistance programs.team members.

In 2019, NXP granted more than 800 internships to university students. Investing in Future Talent

NXP’s strong commitment to itsour internship programs is a key contributor to growingdeveloping the new generation of talent, including engineers, in our industry and at NXP. company.

Interns

Our internship programs focus on the students’ technical advancement as well as growth in additionaland skills development that are needed as they prepare to enter the professional workforce inworkforce. In 2021, despite the future. Thechallenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, we continued to welcome university students to NXP through a virtual internship program, allowing us to keep building the talent pipeline despite the global challenges we faced.

In 2021, NXP granted more than 800 internships to university students and converted 40% of our interns into an NXP team member.

New College Graduates

Our internship programs build a highly capable and energetic pipeline that contributed to the over 600 new college graduate positionspipeline. In 2021, we offeredwere pleased to welcome approximately 644 new college graduates, an increase over the 470 new college graduates we hired in 2019.2020. These hires represent 24% of our overall IDL hiring activity, in which 30% of the new college graduate hires were women.

University Partnerships and Engagement

Through our partnerships with universities across the world, we fund and support advanced research programs and projects that demonstrate our commitment to investing in the future of not only technologiestechnology, but also the students’ knowledge and skills which quiteskills. Quite often, translatesthese partnerships translate into new and exciting solutions for our customers and markets.

To complementdrive deeper awareness and engagement with our advanced research programs,university partnerships, NXP also provides several programcreated a University Relations Council, whose goal is to drive a coherent and aligned approach towards university partnerships by linking recruitment, global sales and marketing, and R&D programs.

 

715


SUSTAINABILITYENVIRONMENT, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) (continued)

 

Our 2021 university funding and commitment was diverse and allowed us to support advanced research programs and sponsorships, including: EcoCar,including the following:

Nearly 80 university projects: in countries across the globe, including Austria, Belgium, Czechia, France, Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom, among others, led by NXP, with support from most business lines and functions.

+70 projects with the Semiconductor Research Consortium (SRC): projects engaged NXP liaisons in Canada and the United States with university professors and students on advanced silicon design, production, and manufacturing processes. In addition, these programs provided students with a path for technology transfer and expertise for the industry.

EcoCar: a US Department of Energy program, workingallowed NXP to work with dozens of Universities12 universities across the USUnited States to develop more economic, environmentally friendly, and connected vehicles; Stanford University’s SystemX Alliance,vehicles. NXP looks forward to the final’s ceremony and the selection of winners in 2022.

2021 NXP Cup: invites participants to an autonomous robotics and automotive challenge. Participants design and build a research collaboration of businesscar, design the software program, and race a pro-level autonomous car against other teams while aiming for the fastest time and precise maneuvering. The 2021 virtual event engaged more than 100 university teams in Europe. The virtual and live finals event drew more than 3,000 views on YouTube.

2021 NXP Hover Games 2 Challenge: incorporates NXP technology in drones to help others during an emergency. We engaged more than 630 participants, of which 30% were students, with strong participation from India and the United States.

2021 NXP Smart Car Race Design Challenge: the Indian engineering student community focused two days on advanced topicsartificial intelligence in mobility, where students were invited to showcase and race their driverless car prototypes on a virtual racetrack, using skills in the areas of coding, AI algorithms, sign recognition, sensor, motion detection camera vision, image processing and more. More than 620 students registered for the event from silicon design,more than 24 states and 87 universities. Seventeen teams of 57 students were short-listed for the Internettwo-day grand finale of Everything and technological advancementslive races, with an in-depth evaluation from external judges.

Giving Back to our Communities

At NXP, we believe in medicine; and our own global university event called The NXP Cup,making a positive difference in the communities in which over 10,000 students usewe live and work. We are committed to supporting these efforts across the globe and encourage our technologyteam members to give generously of their time, resources, and compete intalents to impact our communities. Many major NXP sponsored events in Asiasites have their own volunteer and Europe.donation programs that focus on education, poverty, hunger, health, and well-being within their respective communities.

Supply chainSocial ResponsibilityTo ensure integrity throughout

NXP recognizes that our supply chain, we require key, high-risk suppliers, as well as selected indirect suppliers, to undergooperations can impact the NXP supplier audit process. We completed 17 supplier audits through the calendar year 2019. Our audit closure rate in calendar year 2019 was 85% for all related findings. Our top findings include Freely Chosen Employment, Emergency Preparedness and Working Hours. The highest riskhuman rights of forced laborour team members, workers in our supply chain, and the people in our host communities. We endeavor to demonstrate respect for human rights through our everyday activities and decision-making as we aim to identify and address adverse human-rights impacts.

To identify potentially adverse human-rights impacts, we use input from internal and external resources to inform our approach and responses, which is where foreign laboran integral part of our business decision-making and risk-management systems.

16


ENVIRONMENT, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) (continued)

Supply Chain Due Diligence

NXP works with suppliers to help them achieve and maintain our standards and expectations. Our preference is utilized.to work with suppliers to address potential deficiencies, develop, and implement a corrective action plan. In 2021, our due-diligence supplier audits identified 160 nonconformances, in which we closed 143, resulting in an 89% closure rate. We remain vigilantbegan our supplier audit program in 2013 and have since audited 156 suppliers.

LOGO

The number of audits naturally increases the overall total number of nonconformances. Our approach is to divide the number of nonconformances per number of audits, as well as the number of priority violations per number of audits. While the number of nonconformances increased compared to 2020, we saw a decrease in 2021 compared to 2020, for both ratios.

LOGO

LOGO

17


ENVIRONMENT, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) (continued)

In 2018, we set a goal to close 80% of our supplier nonconformances within the 90-day timeframe. In 2021, we set a new goal at an 85% closure rate. We chose this 5% increase after reviewing improvements in closure-rate performance from audits performed in 2019 and 2020. The closure rate for 2021 was 89%, compared to 97% in 2020. The 8% drop was primarily due to almost double the number of audits completed in 2021 compared to 2020. The lower closure rate is also attributable to the riskdemand on the supply-chain during the ongoing pandemic and production ramp up to overcome the semiconductor shortage. These two trends created challenges in working hours and labor supply at our suppliers in 2021.

LOGO

Health & Safety

NXP is committed to ensuring a safe and healthy workplace for our team members, partners, and visitors. We ensure the health and safety of forced labor, child labor and threats to the freedom of association within our supply chain.

Protecting our environment and employeesWe understand and acknowledge that climate change is contributed toteam members by human activity, and will lead to a number of social, economic and environmental consequences if not properly dealt with. We continue to set sustainability goals, track our progress, and audit ourusing advanced management systems to reduce energy consumption, carbon emissions, waste and water usage throughoutcertifications. All manufacturing sites, and our global footprint. These efforts are both important to and are fully supported by senior management. We report our metrics based on the calendar year 2019.

All of our manufacturing facilitiescorporate headquarters, are certified to the ISO 14001 Environmental Management System and45001 standard for Occupational Health and Safety Assessment Series (“OHSAS”) 18001-certified. and are audited both externally and internally for third-party certification.

We reducemaintained our historic low injury rate (TCIR) of 0.08 in 2021, which remains well below the amount of carbon emissions, energysemiconductor-industry averages published by the Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA) and water consumption by setting targets, identifying emission reduction, energy and water conservation opportunities, auditing management systems, creating awareness among employees and reporting on progress for our operations. Our sustainability policy details our commitmentthe European Semiconductor Industry Association (ESIA), which ranges from 0.35 to environmental responsibility and a safe workplace.

EmissionsCarbon emissions are measured using three scopes: Scope 1 emissions are0.89. NXP’s low injury rate is attributed to the robust Health & Safety programs we have in place at all direct emissions; Scope 2 emissions are indirect emissions from electricity purchased and consumed by NXP, and Scope 3 are all other indirect emissions. In calendar year 2019, our carbon emissions under Greenhouse Gas Protocol for Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 totaled ~1,288,000 tons CO2, which is a normalized 24% decrease since 2010.

EnergyTo achieve our objective of reducing energy consumption, each manufacturing site is required to achieve annual energy saving goals. In calendar year 2019, our total grid electricity consumption was~1,500-Gigawatt hour (“GWh”). Compared to calendar year 2010, the site-initiated energy conservation projects reduced the normalized energy consumption by 6.5%.

WaterOur progress in reducing water consumption has been driven by reducing water use through more efficient processes and recycling the water we use. In calendar year 2019, our water withdrawal was ~10,800,000 m3 and our percentage of water recycled was 39%. Compared to calendar year 2010, the site-initiated water conservation projects reduced the normalized water consumption by 13%.

Health and safetyAll of our manufacturing sites have health and safety management systems certified to OHSAS 18001. We work hard to keep our employees safe and healthy. Our injury rate in calendar year 2019 is 0.12, a rate that is well below the semiconductor industry average.sites.

 

8LOGO

18


AGM PROPOSALS

ITEM 1: ADOPTION OF THE 20192021 STATUTORY ANNUAL ACCOUNTS

The Company has prepared two sets of financial statements, one based on accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) and filed with the SEC in the 2021 Annual Report on Form10-K, and one based on Dutch law and International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union (the “Statutory Annual Accounts”).

For internal and external reporting purposes, the Company followsprepares financial statements based on US GAAP. However, as a public limited liability company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands, the Company is required by Dutch law to prepare the 20192021 Statutory Annual Accounts and submit them to the Annual General Meeting for adoption. The report of KPMGErnst & Young Accountants N.V.LLP (“KPMG”E&Y”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019,2021, and the 20192021 Statutory Annual Accounts is included in the 20192021 statutory annual report (the “Statutory Annual Report”), and is published on the Company’s website (http://investors.nxp.com) and also is also available at the principal offices of the Company.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ADOPTION OF THE 20192021 STATUTORY ANNUAL ACCOUNTS.

ITEM 2: DISCHARGE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES IN THE 20192021 FINANCIAL YEAR

It is proposed to discharge the members of the Board, in accordance with Dutch law, for the performance of their respective duties in the financial year 2019.2021. The proposed discharge only covers the matters that are disclosed in the Statutory Annual Report or otherwise publicly disclosed at the time the resolution to discharge is adopted.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE PROPOSAL TO DISCHARGE THE BOARD FOR THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES IN THE FISCALFINANCIAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019.2021.

 

919


ITEM 3:(RE-)APPOINTMENT OF DIRECTORS

The Company has aone-tier board structure, consisting of one or more executive directors and (independent)non-executive directors. The Board currently consists of tentwelve directors, one executive director and nineeleven non-executive directors. The number of executive andnon-executive directors is determined by the Board.

Messrs. Kaeser, Goldman and Smitham are retiring from our Board at the expiration of their terms as of the end of the Annual General Meeting and are not standing for re-election. If each nominated director discussed below is appointed at the AGM, the Board will consist of ten directors.

As announced on March 5, 2020, the Board proposes the appointment of Kurt Sievers as the Company’s executive director and chief executive officer to succeed Richard Clemmer who has successfully led NXP since 2009. In connection with his nomination as executive director and president/chief executive officer, Mr. Sievers and the Company entered into a management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) and NXP Semiconductors Germany GmbH, a wholly owned indirect affiliate of the Company, and Mr. Sievers entered into an addendum to Mr. Sievers’ existing employment agreement (the “Secondment Addendum” and together with the Management Agreement, the “CEO Agreements”). A copy of the CEO Agreements can be found as Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2 on Form8-K filed by the Company on March 9, 2020.

The CEO Agreements provide that effective May 27, 2020, subject to the condition that the Company’s AGM appoints Mr. Sievers as Executive Director and President/CEO, Mr. Sievers will serve in these capacities until the date of the following annual general meeting, and will be extended if NXP‘s general meeting reappoints Mr. Sievers as Executive Director and President/CEO of NXP. Under the CEO Agreements, effective upon his appointment as president/chief executive officer on May 27, 2020, Mr. Sievers will receive a gross annual base salary of EUR 1 million and will be eligible for payment under the AIP, theon-target cash incentive percentage being 150% of the annual base salary for Mr. Sievers, with the maximum annual incentive opportunity equal to 200% of the at target incentive opportunity. The actual amount payable to Mr. Sievers as an annual incentive bonus will be dependent upon the achievement of performance targets which are set every year by the compensation committee of the Board and which are expected to be substantially the same as the targets established under the plan for other executives. Depending on performance, the actual amount payable as an annual cash bonus to Mr. Sievers may be less than, greater than or equal to the stated target bonus (and could be zero).

In connection with Mr. Sievers appointment as executive director and president/chief executive officer, Mr. Sievers will be awarded long term incentive equity awards with a total grant value of USD 3 million, 30% in the form of restricted share units and 70% in the form of performance restricted share units, subject to substantially the same terms and conditions (including vesting and performance conditions) as established for other executive officers of the Company. The CEO Agreements provide that in the event that Mr. Sievers employment is terminated at the initiative of the Company and other than for cause, Mr. Sievers will be entitled to a severance amount of two times the gross annual base salary and apro-rata payment of the annual cash bonus, depending on achievement of thepay-out conditions and the period in which Mr. Sievers has performed actual work for the Company.

Under our Articles of Association and Dutch corporate law, the directors are collectively responsible for the management, general and financial affairs and policy and strategy of our Company. Our executive director (who serves as our President and Chief Executive Officer) is responsible for theday-to-day management of the Company and for the preparation and execution of Board resolutions, to the extent these tasks are not delegated to a committee of the Board. Our Chief Executive Officer or all directors acting jointly may represent the Company with third parties.

Consistent with established Dutch law and our Articles of Association and Dutch law, the executive directorand non-executive directors are appointed by the shareholders at a general meeting of shareholders fromupon a binding nomination proposed by the Board. The Board has nominated all currentthe ninenon-executive directors listed below for reappointment, as well as Kurt Sievers as executivere-appointment and one new director and president/chief executive officerlisted below for appointment to be elected to serve until their term expires at the end of the 20212023 Annual General Meeting of the Shareholders, or until their appointment is terminated in accordance with the Articles of Association. The binding nominations by the Board are made in accordance with Section 14.4 of the Articles of Association. The shareholders at an annual general meeting may at all times overrule the binding nature of such a nomination by a resolution adopted by at least a two thirds majority of the votes cast, provided such majority represents more than half of our issued and outstanding share capital. If the nomination is not overruled, the nominated member of the Board shall be appointed. In caseIf the nomination is overruled, the Board may then make a new nomination. If a nomination has not been made or has not been made in due time, this shall be stated in the notice and the general meeting of shareholders shall be free to appoint a member of the Board at its discretion. The latter resolution of the general meeting of shareholders must also be adopted by at least two thirds majority of the votes cast, provided such majority represents more than half of our issued share capital.

Our directors are appointed for one year and will be, if nominated by the Board,re-electable each year at a general meeting of shareholders. Our directors may be suspended or dismissed at any time by the shareholders at an annual general meeting of shareholders. A resolution to suspend or dismiss a director will have tomust be adopted by at least a two thirds majority of the votes cast, provided such majority represents more than half of our issued share capital unless the proposal to suspend or dismiss a director is made

10


ITEM 3:(RE-)APPOINTMENT OF DIRECTORS (continued)

by the Board, in which case resolutions shall be adopted by a simple majority of votes cast. An executive director can also be suspended by the Board.

If appointed, each director’s term begins at the annual general meeting at which he or she is appointed and, unless such director resigns or is suspended or dismissed at an earlier date, his or her term of office lapsesends immediately after the next annual general meeting held after his or her appointment.

The Board and the Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committee have carefully considered the experience, structure, culture, diversity, operation, interactions, collaboration and performance of the current Board; the talents, expertise and contributions of individual directors; the growth and creation of shareholder and other stakeholder value under the Board’s leadership; the continued evolution of the Company; the Board’s critical role in continuing to develop and lead the strategic direction of the Company; the continued change and consolidation in the semiconductor industry; anticipated future challenges and opportunities facing the Company; and the Board’s ongoing commitment to ensuring the long-term sustainability of the Company to the benefit of shareholders and other stakeholders.

As announced on March 5, 2020, the Board considers Mr. Kurt Sievers to be the ideal candidate to become NXP’s next executive director and chief executive officer, succeeding Mr. Rick Clemmer. After a distinguished career establishing NXP as the world leader in Automotive semiconductor solutions, the Board believes Mr. Sievers has all of the requisite skills to lead NXP, and to drive the strategy that Rick Clemmer and the management team have developed over the past years. Mr. Sievers is unique in his ability to translate vision and strategy into world-class execution, bringing together teams to drive results. He has the demonstrated ability to focus, motivate and lead a globally diverse organization, and embodies NXP’s ethos of a “Customer Focused Passion to Win”.

The Board and the Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committee also believe that, at the current time, fostering continuity on the Board by nominating allour Chair of ourthe Board and eight other current ninenon-executivedirectorsfor re-appointment and one new director for appointment is instrumental to the ongoing execution of our mission and strategy as well as the delivery of sustainable long-term value to shareholders while also serving the interests of our other stakeholders. Based on these considerations, among others, NXP’s Board recommends a vote “FOR” the appointment of each director. The persons named as proxies intend to vote the proxies for the election of these nominees to the Board.

Each of the proposed appointments is considered a separate voting item under Dutch law. Information concerning each of the ten nominated directors is set forth below. Each nominee is currently on NXP’s Board, other than Kurt Sievers who is being nominated for the first time this year, and allAll nominees consented to act as directors if appointed at the AGM. This Item 3 comprises the “explanatory notes” to the agenda of the Annual General Meeting as referred to in Section 25.5 of the Articles of Association.

20


ITEM 3: (RE-)APPOINTMENT OF DIRECTORS (continued)

In accordance with the recommendation of the Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committee, the Board has unanimously adopted resolutions to nominate the persons set forth below persons for director. Our nominees for director, their ages, principal occupations or positions, experience and the year first elected as a director, are described below. As part of our board refreshment process, a third party search firm provided a pool of candidates to the Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee for consideration. From this pool of candidates the Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee determined, according to the process described below, that the new nominee for director had the appropriate qualifications and experience and would positively contribute to the mix of talent, experience and perspective on the Board. None of the nominees are related by blood, marriage or adoption to each other or to any other director or to any executive officer of NXP or its subsidiaries. Except for Mr. Kurt Sievers, who is currently President and will began serving as executive director, and President and Chief Executive Officer, immediately after the AGM, no nominee for director has been an employee of the Company within the past five years.

Board Diversity Matrix

(As of April 11, 2022)

  

Country of Principal Executive Offices:

  The Netherlands 
  

Foreign Private Issuer

  No 
  

Disclosure Prohibited under Home Country Law

  No 
  

Total Number of Directors

  12 
    
   Female           Male           Non-Binary     Did Not
Disclose
Gender        
 
  

Part I: Gender Identity

                   
    

Directors

  4    8    0    0 
 

Part II: Demographic Background

 

    

African American or Black

  0    1    0    0 
    

White

  4    7    0    0 

Note that the table above, in accordance with NASDAQ disclosure requirements, describes the board diversity characteristics of the members of the Board as of the date of this proxy statement, including the current members of the Board who will depart the Board at this year’s Annual General Meeting and excluding the new director nominee.

21


ITEM 3:(RE-)APPOINTMENT OF DIRECTORS (continued)

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPOINTMENT OF EACH NOMINEE FOR DIRECTOR LISTED BELOW.

Nominees for Director

Kurt Sievers

CurrentCEO-elect and President; Future Executive Director, President & CEO of NXP

 

  

Kurt Sievers (1969, German) is currentlyexecutive director, president and memberchief executive officer since May 2020, after a successful track record as the president of the management team,NXP, overseeing all of the company’s business lines. As discussed above, Mr. Sievers was nominated by the Board for appointment as executive director in connection with his appointment as Chief Executive Officer. In addition, he is Managing Director at NXP Semiconductors Germany GmbH.lines, since 2018. Mr. Sievers joined NXP in 1995, and rapidly moved through a series of Marketing & Sales, Product Definition & Development, Strategy and General Management leadership positions across a broad number of market segments. He has been a member of the executive management team since 2009, where he has been instrumental in the definition and implementation of the NXP High-Performance Mixed Signal strategy. In 2015, Mr. Sievers was influential in the merger of NXP and Freescale Semiconductor.

 

Mr. Sievers serves on the Boardboard of the German National Electrical and Electronics Industry Association (ZVEI), the Global Semiconductor Alliance (GSA) and chairsCapgemini S.E. Mr. Sievers is president of ESIA (European Semiconductor Industry Association). He chaired the Advisory Boardadvisory board of the international trade-fair Electronica.Electronica until June 2021. He also serves as a board member of PENTA and AENEAS, the clustersan industrial association for application and technology research in Europe on nano-electronics. In his role as managing director for NXP Germany,Mr. Sievers serves as a member of the Asia-Pacific-Committee of German Business (APA) and as a member of the Board at the German Asia-Pacific Business Association (OAV), acting as the spokesperson for the Republic of Korea.

 

Mr. Sievers earned a master’s degree in physics and information technology from Augsburg University, Germany.

 

 

Executive Director Nominee

Director since 2020

 

Age 5053

 

Other Current Public Boards:

  None.Capgemini S.E.

 

Key Qualifications and Expertise:

  International Experience

  Executive Leadership

  Industry and Technology Experience

  Strategic Planning, Growth, Mergers & Acquisition

  Manufacturing and Operations

  Human Capital/Talent Development

  IT and Cybersecurity

Sir Peter Bonfield CBE FREng

 

  
Sir Peter Bonfield (1944, British) was appointed anon-executive director and the chairmanchair of our board of directors in August 2010. Prior to that, Sir Peter was the chairmanchair of the supervisory board of NXP B.V. from September 29, 2006. Sir Peter served as chief executive officer and chairmanchair of the executive committee for British Telecom plc from 1996 to 2002 and prior to that was chairmanchair and chief executive officer of ICL plc (now Fujitsu Services Holdings Ltd.). Sir Peter also worked in the semiconductor industry during his tenure as a divisional director at Texas Instruments Incorporated, for whom he held a variety of senior management positions around the world. In addition, Sir Peter has served as a director of twelve large technology companies. Sir Peter currently holds anon-executive directorshipdirectorships at Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited, Darktrace plc and Imagination Technologies, is Chair of Council and SeniorPro-Chancellor at Loughborough University, Board Director at East West Institute USA and Boardboard Mentor at CMi in London.London and formerly served on the board of directors of Mentor Graphics Corporation. He is Advisoradvisor to Longreach LLP in Hong Kong, Alix Partners UK LLP in London and is a Fellowfellow of The Royal Academy of Engineering. Sir Peter iswas named Outstanding Director for 2019 by the Financial Times. 

ChairmanChair of the Board

 

Independent Director

 

Director since 2010;Director of an NXP affiliated entity since September 2006*

 

Age 7577

 

Board Committees:

  Human Resources and Compensation Committee

  Nominating, & Governance and Sustainability Committee

 

Other Current Public Boards:

  Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited

  Darktrace plc

 

Key Qualifications and Expertise:

  International Experience

  Executive Leadership

  Industry and Technology Experience

  Strategic Planning, Growth, Mergers & Acquisition

  Corporate Governance, Legal, Global Compliance Experience

  Human Capital/Talent Development

 

*

Until August 2010, when NXP Semiconductors N.V. became a publicpublicly listed NASDAQ,Nasdaq, company, Sir Peter Bonfield (since September 2006) was a director of certain NXP subsidiaries. According to the Dutch corporate governance code and EC Recommendation 2005/162/EC, the tenure of Sir Peter Bonfield, calculated as from August 2010 when the current NXP Semiconductors N.V. became listed at NASDAQ,on Nasdaq, would be 9.811.9 years.

 

1222


ITEM 3:(RE-)APPOINTMENT OF DIRECTORS (continued)

 

Kenneth A. GoldmanAnnette Clayton

Chief FinancialExecutive Officer of Yahoo!, Inc. (retired)and President, Schneider Electric North America

 

Kenneth A. Goldman (1949,Annette Clayton (1964, American) was appointed anon-executive director of our board of directors effective August 6, 2010. Mr. GoldmanMay 26, 2021. Ms. Clayton is formerthe chief financialexecutive officer and president of Yahoo!, Inc. PriorSchneider Electric North America, a region of Schneider Electric, a multinational firm specializing in energy management and automation solutions. Through December 2018, Ms. Clayton also held the title of chief supply chain officer for the Group and led the transformation of its $13 billion global supply chain operation for seven years and from 2011 to October 2012, Mr. Goldman served as senior vice president, finance2016 led the environmental and administration, and chief financial officersocial governance function. She is also a member of Fortinet, Inc, a provider of unified threat management solutions, from September 2007 to September 2012.the company’s executive committee. From November 2006 to August 2007, Mr. Goldman served as executive vice2011, Ms. Clayton led Dell Inc.’s supply chain transformation and oversaw the global manufacturing and fulfillment operation. She was also responsible for the Americas’ commercial order management and customer care operations. From 1983 to 2006 Ms. Clayton worked at General Motors Corporation in senior management roles in engineering and production, including president, Saturn Corporation. Ms. Clayton chairs the National Electrical Manufacturers Association and chief financial officeris a member of Dexterra, Inc. From August 2000 until March 2006, Mr. Goldman served as senior vice president, finance and administration, and chief financial officerthe board of Siebel Systems, Inc., and from December 1999 to December 2003, Mr. Goldman served ondirectors of the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s primary advisory group. Mr. Goldman currentlyNational Association of Manufacturers. She serves on the board of directorsDuke Energy Corporation and the Schneider Ventures boards of TriNet Group,AlphaStruxure, Uplight Inc., GoPro, Inc., RingCentral, Inc., Zuora, Inc.,QMerit, EnergySage, and several private companies, including serving as President of Hillspire, LLC. Mr. Goldman also is a member of the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) Foundation, and in 2015 was appointed to a three-year termpreviously served on the Standards Advisory Group which advises the PCAOB. Mr. Goldman was a member of board of trustees of Cornell University from 2005 to 2013 and was designated as Emeritus Trustee. He was formerly a member of the Treasury Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession, a public committee that made recommendations in September 2008 to encourage a more sustainable auditing profession. Mr. Goldman holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Cornell University and an M.B.A. from the Harvard Business School.Polaris Inc until April 2021. 

Independent Director

 

Director since 20102021

 

Age 7058

 

Board Committees:

  Nominating & GovernanceHuman Resources and Compensation Committee

 

Other Current Public Boards:

  TriNet Group, Inc.

  GoPro, Inc.

  RingCentral, Inc.

  Zuora, Inc.

Key Qualifications and Expertise:

  Executive Leadership

  Industry and Technology Experience

  Strategic Planning, Growth, Mergers & Acquisition

  Corporate Governance, Legal, Global Compliance Experience

  Financial, Audit & Accounting Expertise

  Manufacturing and Operations

Josef Kaeser

President and Chief Executive Officer of Siemens AG

Josef Kaeser (1957, German) was appointed anon-executive director of our board of directors effective September 1, 2010. Mr. Kaeser is the president and chief executive officer of Siemens AG since August 2013. Prior to this, from May 2006 to August 2013, he was member of the managing board and chief financial officer of Siemens AG. From 2004 to 2006, Mr. Kaeser served as chief strategy officer for Siemens AG and as the chief financial officer for the mobile communications group from 2001 to 2004. Mr. Kaeser has additionally held various other positions within the Siemens group since he joined Siemens in 1980. Mr. Kaeser also serves on the managing board of Siemens AG and the board of directors of Siemens Ltd., India, Daimler AG, Allianz Deutschland AG andMercedes-Benz AG.

Independent Director

Director since 2010

Age 62

Board Committees:

  Nominating & Governance Committee

Other Current Public Boards:

  Siemens AG

  Daimler AGDuke Energy Corporation

 

Key Qualifications and Expertise:

  International Experience

  Executive Leadership

  Industry and Technology Experience

  Strategic Planning, Growth, Mergers & Acquisition

  Corporate Governance, Legal, Global Compliance Experience

  Manufacturing and Operations

  Risk Management

  Human Capital/Talent Development

  IT and Cybersecurity

  ESG Expertise

Anthony Foxx

Anthony Foxx (1971, American) was appointed a non-executive director of our board of directors effective May 26, 2021. From October 2018 to January 2022, Mr. Foxx served as the chief policy officer and senior advisor to the president and chief executive officer of Lyft. Prior to joining Lyft, Inc., Mr. Foxx served as a managing partner of related infrastructure, the infrastructure development group of Related Companies, a real estate firm, from December 2017 to October 2018. From July 2013 to January 2017, Mr. Foxx served as the seventeenth United States Secretary of Transportation. Mr. Foxx served as the mayor of Charlotte, North Carolina from 2009 to 2013 and as a Charlotte City council member at-large representative from 2005 to 2009. Mr. Foxx also has held a variety of legal positions in the public and private sectors. Mr. Foxx serves on the board of directors of Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., CDW Corporation and Shelter Acquisition Corporation I. He holds a Doctor of Law (J.D.) from New York University School of Law, and a Bachelor of Arts (B.A.), History, from Davidson College.

Independent Director

Director since 2021

Age 50

Board Committees:

  Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee

Other Current Public Boards:

  CDW Corporation

  Martin Marietta Materials Inc.

  Shelter Acquisition Corporation I

Key Qualifications and Expertise:

  Executive Leadership

  Industry and Technology Experience

  Strategic Planning, Growth, Mergers & Acquisition

Financial, Audit & Accounting Expertise

  Risk Management

  ESG Expertise

23


ITEM 3: (RE-)APPOINTMENT OF DIRECTORS (continued)

Chunyuan Gu

President of Asia, the Middle East and Africa regions of ABB Ltd (retired)

Chunyuan Gu (1958, Swedish) is nominated as a non-executive director of our board of directors. Mr. Gu has over 30 years of experience working at ABB Ltd, a global pioneering technology leader in electrification and automation serving customers in utility, industry, transportation and infrastructure. Mr. Gu began his career at ABB Corporate Research in Sweden in 1989, and has held various roles and functions in R&D, manufacturing operations and general management. Since 2020, Mr. Gu serves in an advisory capacity as chair of the board of ABB (China) Ltd. From 2017-2019, Mr. Gu was a member of the ABB group executive committee and president of the Asia, the Middle East and Africa region. From 2014-2017, Mr. Gu served as president and CEO of ABB China. Since 2020, Mr. Gu has served as a non-executive director of CLP Holdings Limited. Since 2021, Mr. Gu has served as senior advisor at Blackstone Ltd. Mr. Gu holds a bachelor of engineering from Shanghai Jiao Tong University and a PhD, school of aeronautics from the Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm. He is a fellow of IVA, the Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences.

Independent Director Nominee

Age 63

Other Current Public Boards:

  CLP Holdings Limited

Key Qualifications and Expertise:

  International Experience

  Executive Leadership

  Industry and Technology Experience

  Manufacturing and Operations

  Risk Management

  Human Capital/Talent Development

  IT and CybersecurityESG Expertise

13


ITEM 3:(RE-)APPOINTMENT OF DIRECTORS (continued)

Lena Olving

President and CEO of Mycronic AB (retired)

 

  

Lena Olving (1956, Swedish) was appointed anon-executive director of our board of directors in June 2019. SheservedSheserved as Presidentpresident and CEO of Mycronic AB (listed on NASDAQNasdaq OMX Stockholm), between from 2013 and 2019, a Swedish high-tech equipment company serving the electronics industry. Before that Ms. Olving worked at Saab AB, a listed Defence and Security company, as Deputydeputy CEO and Chief Operating Officer .chief operating officer. Her earlier career also includes various managerial positions within Volvo Car Corporation, in total 25 years, of which 5 years in Asia Pacific and 7 years in the Executive Management Team.executive management team.

 

Ms. Olving is a board member of Assa Abloy AB, Vestas Wind Systems A/S Investment AB Latour, Munters Group AB, (all public listed), Chairmanchair of Academic Work Holding AB, Chairmanchair of the Boardboard at the Royal Swedish Opera and board member of ScandiNova Systems AB and board member of Stena Metall AB. Ms. Olving has declined re-election as board member at Munters Group AB, and her current board service will end in May 2022. She is elected as a fellow of IVA, the Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences. She holds a Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Chalmers in Gothenburg, Sweden.

 

In January 2018, Ms. Olving was presented H.M., The King’s Medal of the 12th size with blue ribbon for outstanding efforts within Swedish business sector. In October 2019, she was awarded IVA’s Gold Medal for pioneering and outstanding leadership within the tech sector.

 

Independent Director

 

Director since 2019

 

Age 6365

 

Board Committees:

  Human Resources and Compensation Committee

 

Other Current Public Boards:

  Assa Abloy AB

  Investment AB Latour

  Vestas Wind Systems A/S

Munters Group AB (ending May 2022)

 

Key Qualifications and Expertise:

  International Experience

  Executive Leadership

  Industry and Technology Experience

  Strategic Planning, Growth, Mergers & Acquisition

  Financial, Audit & Accounting Expertise

  Manufacturing and Operations

  Risk Management

  Human Capital/Talent Development

  IT and Cybersecurity

Peter Smitham

Member of Permira Advisors LLP (retired)

Peter Smitham (1942, British) was appointed anon-executive director of our board of directors effective December 7, 2015. Mr. Smitham retired from his position as a partner of the private equity firm Permira on December 31, 2009, but until August 1, 2015, he was a member of Permira Advisers LLP, which he joined in 1985, the year the London office was founded. Mr. Smitham was the managing partner of the London office from 1994 until 1998 and led Permira’s European business from 1996 until 2000. He has worked on numerous transactions focusing on technology, including Memec Group Holdings Limited, The Roxboro Group, Solartron Group and Technology plc. Until its merger with NXP, Mr. Smitham was a director of Freescale. He joined the Freescale board in June 2007 and was a member of the Compensation and Leadership Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Freescale board. He has a degree in Geography from Swansea University, Wales, and attended the Senior Executive Program at Stanford Business School.

Independent Director

Director since 2015

Age 77

Board Committees:

  Compensation Committee (Chair)

Other Current Public Boards:

  None

Key Qualifications and Expertise:

  International Experience

  Executive Leadership

  Industry and Technology Experience

  Strategic Planning, Growth, Mergers & Acquisition

  Corporate Governance, Legal, Global Compliance Experience

  Financial, Audit & Accounting Expertise

  Human Capital/Talent Development

1424


ITEM 3:(RE-)APPOINTMENT OF DIRECTORS (continued)

 

Julie Southern

Chief Commercial Officer, Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd. (retired)

 

  
Ms. Julie Southern (1959, British) was appointed anon-executive director of our board of directors in October 2013. She was with Virgin Atlantic Limited (UK) from 2000 to May 2013. From 2010 to 2013 Ms. Southern was chief commercial officer and from 2000 to 2010 she was chief financial officer of Virgin Atlantic. Prior to joining Virgin Atlantic, she was group finance director at Porsche Cars Great Britain and finance and operations director at W H Smith—H J Chapman & Co Ltd. Prior to that, she was a chartered accountant at Price Waterhouse Coopers. Ms. Southern currently holdsnon-executive directorships at Rentokil-Initial plc, Ocado Group plc and easyJet plc, and is Chairchair of the respective Audit Committees.audit committees. Ms. Southern is also a member of the Remuneration Committeesremuneration committees at Rentokil-Initial, Ocado and easyJet, and is the senior independent director at easyJet. Previously, Ms. Southern held directorships at Stagecoach Group plc (2016-2018), DFS Furniture plc (2015-2019) and Cineworld Group plc (2015-2019). 

Independent Director

 

Director since 2013

 

Age 6062

 

Board Committees:

  Audit Committee (Chair)

 

Other Current Public Boards:

  Rentokil-Initial Plc

  easyJet plc

  Ocado Group plc

 

Key Qualifications and Expertise:

  Executive Leadership

  Strategic Planning, Growth, Mergers & Acquisition

  Financial, Audit & Accounting Expertise

  Human Capital/Talent Development

Jasmin Staiblin

Chief Executive Officer of Alpiq (retired)

 

  
Jasmin Staiblin (1970, German) was appointed anon-executive director of our board of directors in June 2019. She served between 2013 and 2018 as Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer of Alpiq, a leading Swiss energy services provider and power producer in Europe. She successfully led the company through a major transformation in a fundamentally changing energy market. She began her career in 1997 at the ABB Group, the Swedish-Swiss global technology company, starting in ABB’s group research center. From 1999 to 2005 she served in various global functions and as a member of the management team for ABB’s power technologies division. She held the position of chief executive officer of ABB Switzerland from 2006 to 2012. Ms. Staiblin is a board member of Georg Fischer AG, Schaffhausen Rolls-Royce plc, London and Zurich Insurance Group Ltd.Ltd and chair of the supervisory board of Rolls-Royce Power Systems AG and MTU Friedrichshafen GmbH. She formerly served on the board of Rolls-Royce plc. Ms. Staiblin studied Physics and Electrical Engineering at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany and the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, Sweden. She completed her studies with a Degree in Physics and has a Master of Science in electrical engineering. 

Independent Director

 

Director since 2019

 

Age 5052

 

Board Committees:

  Audit Committee

 

Other Current Public Boards:

  Georg Fischer AG

  Rolls-Royce plc

  Zurich Insurance Group Ltd.

 

Key Qualifications and Expertise:

  International Experience

  Executive Leadership

  Industry and Technology Experience

  Strategic Planning, Growth, Mergers & Acquisition

  Corporate Governance, Legal, Global Compliance Experience

  Financial, Audit & Accounting Expertise

  Manufacturing and Operations

  Risk Management

  Human Capital/Talent Development

IT and Cybersecurity

 

1525


ITEM 3:(RE-)APPOINTMENT OF DIRECTORS (continued)

 

Gregory Summe

Managing Partner of Glen Capital Partners

 

  
Gregory L. Summe (1956, American) was appointed anon-executive director of our board of directors effective December 7, 2015. Mr.2015.Mr. Summe is the Managing Partnermanaging partner of Glen Capital Partners, a Boston based hedge fund, whichan investment fund. Recently, he founded in 2014.was the co-chair and co-founder of NextGen Acquisition Corp. I & II. Previously, Mr. Summe was the managing director and vice chairmanchair of Global Buyout at The Carlyle Group, a leading global private equity firm, from 2009 to 2014. Prior to joining Carlyle, he was the chairmanchair and chief executive officer of PerkinElmer, Inc., a global leader in Health Sciences, a company he led from 1998 to May 2009. He also served as a senior advisor to Goldman Sachs Capital Partners, from 2008 to 2009. He was a director of Freescale Semiconductor from 2010 until its merger with NXP in 2015 and served as Chairmanchair of the Freescale board from 2014-2015. Prior to PerkinElmer, Mr. Summe was with AlliedSignal, now Honeywell International, serving as the president of General Aviation Avionics, president of the Aerospace Engines Group and president of the Automotive Products Group. Before joining AlliedSignal, he was the general manager of Commercial Motors at General Electric and was a partner with the consulting firm of McKinsey & Company, Inc. Mr. Summe holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Kentucky and the University of Cincinnati, and an M.B.A. with distinction from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. He is in the EngineeringUniversity of Kentucky’s Hall of Distinction at the University of Kentucky.Distinction. Mr. Summe also serves on the board of directors of the State Street Corporation, Avantor Corporation and two private companies, Ohana Biosciences,Virgin Orbit Holdings. and Pella Corporation.formerly served on the boards of directors of NextGen Acquisition Corp. I and NextGen Acquisition Corp II. 

Independent Director

 

Director since 2015

 

Age 6365

 

Board Committees:

  Nominating, & Governance and Sustainability Committee (Chair)

 

Other Current Public Boards:

  State Street Corporation

  Virgin Orbit Holdings, Inc.

  Avantor Corporation

 

Key Qualifications and Expertise:

  International Experience

  Executive Leadership

  Industry and Technology Experience

  Strategic Planning, Growth, Mergers & Acquisition

  Corporate Governance, Legal, Global Compliance Experience

  Financial, Audit & Accounting Expertise

  Manufacturing and Operations

  Risk Management

  Human Capital/Talent Development

Karl-Henrik Sundström

CEO of Stora Enso (retired)

 

  
Karl-Henrik Sundström (1960, Swedish) was appointed anon-executive director of our board of directors in June 2019. He served as CEO of Stora Enso from 2014 until his retirement in 2019. He joined Stora Enso in August 2012 as CFO and member of the Group Leadership Team.group leadership team. In June 2013 he took on the role as Executive Vice Presidentexecutive vice president for division Paper and Wood Products. Prior to joining Stora Enso, Mr. Sundström held the role asof CFO of NXP Semiconductors N.V. (2008–2012)(2008-2012). Before that, he held several managerial positions in Ericsson, including CFO. He is a member of the board of Vestas AS, Mölnlycke AB and chairmanvice chair of Boliden AB, chair of the tax delegation for Swedish Business and Commerce, chair of the Climate Leadership Coalition and member of the board of the Marcus Wallenberg Foundation and Tracklib Holdings AB.Foundation. Mr. Sundström participated in an Advanced Management Program at Harvard Business School in 1997 and holds a degree in Business Administration, Finance and Accounting from the Uppsala University, Sweden. 

Independent Director

 

Director since 2019

 

Age 5962

 

Board Committees:

  Audit Committee

  Human Resources and Compensation Committee

 

Other Current Public Boards:

  Mölnlycke Health CareBoliden AB

  Vestas Wind Systems A/S

 

Key Qualifications and Expertise:

  International Experience

  Executive Leadership

  Industry and Technology Experience

  Strategic Planning, Growth, Mergers & Acquisition

  Corporate Governance, Legal, Global Compliance Experience

  Manufacturing and Operations

  Financial, Audit & Accounting Expertise

  Risk Management

  IT and Cybersecurity

  ESG Expertise

 

1626


ITEM 3:(RE-)APPOINTMENT OF DIRECTORS (continued)

 

Nominee Skills and Experience

Our director nominees have a wide variety of relevant skills, professional experience and backgrounds, and collectively bring to our Board diverse viewpoints and perspectives that strengthen its ability to represent the interests of all corporate stakeholders, such as shareholders, creditors, employees, customers and suppliers. The chart below illustrates broad categories of skills and expertise that ournon-executive director nominees offer thatwhich we believe contribute to the effective leadership and exercise of oversight responsibilities by the Board.

 

LOGOLOGO

International Experience: living and working in various regions, in the USA, Europe and/or Asia, and/or experience with businesses with substantial international operations.operations

Executive Leadership: executive management experience with large or international organizations

Industry and Technology Experience: experience with and understanding of the technology industry, including the semiconductor and automotive industries

Strategic Planning, Growth, Mergers & Acquisition: planning knowledge of corporate strategy and strategic planning, and experience with mergers, acquisitions, and other strategic transactions

Corporate Governance, Legal, Global Compliance Experience: knowledge of corporate governance issues applicable to SEC registered companies listed on the NASDAQ,Nasdaq, and having experience within international regulatory affairs or legal sectors

Financial, Audit & Accounting Expertise: financial, audit & accounting expertise and experience with corporate finance, including financial experts as named in the company filings and experience as a CFO, Auditors,Auditor, and Corporate TreasurersTreasurer and public company CEO

Manufacturing and Operations: experience with sophisticated large-scale international manufacturing operations

Risk Management:experience in assessing and managing enterprise risks

Human Capital/Talent Development: experience with human resources management and culture development in large international organizations, in particular in overseeing succession planning, talent development and executive compensation programs

IT and Cybersecurity:experience in understanding and managing information technology and cybersecurity threats

ESG Expertise: experience in understanding and addressing strategic environmental, social and governance issues

17

27


ITEM 3:(RE-)APPOINTMENT OF DIRECTORS (continued)

 

Director Independence

NXP’s Board has determined that allnon-executive director nominees, as well as our current directors who are not standing for re-election, are independent directors under the applicable Nasdaq listing standards, the Rules of Procedure (as defined below), as well as practice 2.1.8 of the DCGC. The current executive director, Mr. Clemmer,Sievers, as our President and Chief Executive Officer, is not an independent director under the above standards. The executive director nominee, Mr. Sievers, would not be an independent director under the above standards if elected. If each nominated director is appointed at the AGM, the full Board (including bothnon-executive directors and our executive director) will consist of 90% independent directors.

OurAs of April 11, 2022, our non-executive director nominees excluding the executive director nominee,who are nominated for re-appointment have an average tenure of 5.34.6 years, which is lower than the average tenure of independent directors on boards of S&P 500 companies, and threesix of our independent nominees, including our new independent nominee for director, have been members of the Board for four years or less. The lower than average tenure of ournon-executive directors must be seen in connection with the pendency of the Qualcomm transaction period between October 2016 and July 2018, during which a number of board members stepped down from the board, and no new board members were appointed.

 

LOGO

(1)

Until August 2010, when NXP Semiconductors N.V. became a public listed NASDAQ company, Sir Peter Bonfield (since September 2006) was a director of certain NXP subsidiaries. According to the Dutch corporate governance code and EC Recommendation 2005/162/EC, the tenure of Sir Peter Bonfield, is calculated here from August 2010 when the current NXP Semiconductors N.V. became listed at NASDAQ.

1828


HOW OUR BOARD GOVERNS AND IS GOVERNED

Rules governingGoverning the Board

The Board has adopted written Rules Governing the Board (the “Rules of Procedure”) governing its performance, its decision making, its composition, the tasks and working procedures of the committees and other matters relating to the Board, the Chief Executive Officer, thenon-executive directors and the committees established by the Board. In accordance with our Rules of Procedure, resolutions of our Board will be adopted by a simple majority of votes cast in a meeting at which at least the majority of its members is present or represented. Each director has the right to cast one vote. In a tie vote, the proposal will be rejected.

In addition to the Rules of Procedure, the Board has adopted charters of its committees, to which the plenary Board, while retaining overall responsibility, has assigned certain tasks: the Audit Committee, the Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committee, and the Human Resources and Compensation Committee. Each committee reports to the plenary Board. The Articles of Association, Rules of Procedure and the committee charters were amended during 2019, and are posted on our Investor Relations website athttp://investors.nxp.com under the “Corporate Governance” section. Copies of our corporate governance materials are also available to shareholders who request them. Requests must be in writing and sent to: NXP Semiconductors N.V., High Tech Campus 60, 5656 AG, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, Attention: Secretary.

The Board is assisted by the Secretary. The Secretary sees to it that correct procedures are followed and that the Board acts in accordance with its statutory obligations and its obligations under the Articles of Association. Furthermore, the Secretary assists the ChairmanChair of the Board (the “Chairman”“Chair”) in the functioning of Board business (information, agenda, evaluation, introductory program). The Secretary, in this capacity, is appointed and dismissed by the Board.ShareholdersBoard.Shareholders or other interested parties who wish to communicate with the Board, including the ChairmanChair and thenon-executive directors individually or as a group, may send correspondence in care of the Secretary at NXP’s principal offices at High Tech Campus 60, 5656 AG, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. Our Secretary will receive all communications sent to this address, and will provide all substantive communications to the Chairman,Chair, excluding simple administrative requests that are appropriately addressed by the Secretary.

Ournon-executive directors oversee the general affairs of the Company and supervise and provide general advice to the executive director. Furthermore, thenon-executive directors perform such acts that are delegated to them pursuant to our Articles of Association or by our board regulations. One of thenon-executive directors directors has been appointed ChairmanChair and anothernon-executive director director has been appointed Vice-ChairmanVice-Chair of the Board.

Under the Rules of Procedure, Board members must comply with any provisions on the maximum number of directorships and board memberships as decided by the Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee. Currently, the Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee has determined that members of the Board shall have no more than four board memberships in public companies in addition to service on the Board of NXP, and not more than two of such board memberships if they are an executive officer.

Each director owes a duty to us to properly perform the duties assigned to him or her and to act in the corporate interest of our Company. Under Dutch law, the corporate interest extends to the interests of all corporate stakeholders, such as shareholders, creditors, employees, customers and suppliers.

Board Leadership and Role in Risk Oversight

Our ChairmanChair works closely with our Chief Executive Officer to set the agenda for Board meetings and to facilitate information flow between the Board and management. Sir Peter Bonfield currently serves as the Chairman.Chair. The ChairmanChair presides at the Board meetings, as well as regularly scheduled executive sessions of thenon-executive directors.

Our independent directors regularly meet in executive session without executive directors or management present. Additionally, the Board and each committee have the power to hire, at the expense of the Company, independent legal, financial or other advisors as they may deem necessary, without consulting or obtaining the approval of any officer of the Company in advance.

 

1929


HOW OUR BOARD GOVERNS AND IS GOVERNED (continued)

 

The Board believes that its current structure continues to provide robust and highly effective oversight based on, among other factors:

 

  

AllThe ninenon-executive directors nominated for (re-) appointment are independent; the sole board member who is not being independent is the nominated executive director (the President and CEO);

 

 

  

Robust Corporate Governance principles, which are reviewed annually;

 

 

  

A ChairmanChair with deep experience in and knowledge of our business and industry with a demonstrated unique and successful strategic vision, including leading our Board during our successful transformation from amid-size specialty semiconductor supplier to a top 10 global supplier(non-memory or foundry), with clear market share leadership in the Automotive semiconductor market. During Rick Clemmer’s leadership, since 2009, our Chairman worked closely with him, and he played a key role in the leadership succession planning, resulting into the nominated new executive directorship appointment of Kurt Sievers. Our ChairmanChair continues to be actively focused on his role of providing the overall strategic leadership for the Company, consistent with Dutch law and the Company’s organizational documents—a role that the Board believes remains critically important as our industry continues to experience significant change and disruption at a rapid rate.;rate;

 

 

  

The Audit, Human Resources and Compensation, and Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committees all are composed entirely of independent directors (as defined in the applicable Nasdaq listing standards and within the meaning of the DCGC);

 

 

  

Approval of any appointment of members to the Audit, Human Resources and Compensation, and Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committees must include at least a majority of the independent directors;

 

 

  

All Board committees operate pursuant to written charters and conduct annual self-assessments;

 

 

  

The independent directors of the Board and its committees receive extensive information and input from multiple layers of management and external advisors, engage in detailed discussion and analysis regarding matters brought before them (including in executive session) and consistently and actively engage in the development and approval of significant corporate strategies;

 

 

  

theThe Board and its committees have unrestricted access to management;

 

 

  

theThe Board and its committees can retain, at Company expense, any advisors they deem necessary with respect to any matter brought before them; and

 

 

  

In 2019,2021, the Board held four executive sessionsof non-management members, and its committees collectively held seventeen21 sessions.

 

Meetings of NXP’s Board

The Board met five5 times in 2019.2021. In addition to these meetings, directors attended meetings of individual Board committees of which they were members. Each of the directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the Board meetings and meetings of committees of which they were a member during the periods for which they served in 2019.2021. NXP does not have a formal policy regarding Board members’ attendance at annual general meetings, but all of our Board members are invited to attend the Annual General Meeting. In 2021, Sir Peter Bonfield, Chair of the Board, as well as Kurt Sievers participated in the Annual General Meeting via teleconference due to restrictions on in person attendance because of COVID-19.

The Rules of Procedure require the independent directors to meet in executive session from time to time, and at least twice annually, without any members of management present. During 2019,2021, the independent directors of the Board met in executive session four4 times.

NXP’s Board Committees

Since September 2019, theThe standing committees of the Board are the Audit Committee, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, and the Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committee.

Effective September 1, 2019, the Board split the Nominating and Compensation Committee into two separate committees: the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Board determined that it was desirable that a new

20


HOW OUR BOARD GOVERNS AND IS GOVERNED (continued)

Nominating and Governance Committee be formed to, among other things, determine Board member selection criteria and appointment procedures, Board evaluation procedures and certain other corporate governance activities. The Board determined that this would allow the Compensation Committee to focus on the important talent management activities of the organization, such as managing CEO and executive succession, evaluating organizational effectiveness and reviewing leadership development practices. The Board believes that having separate committees to oversee these practices allows the proper support to these crucial activities.

All members of the Audit, Human Resources and Compensation, and Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committees are independent directors, as defined in the applicable Nasdaq listing standards, applicable SEC rules and the Rules of Procedure, which includes the requirements of the DCGC. Board approval of any director appointment to the Audit, Human Resources and Compensation, and Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committees must include at least a majority of the independent directors, as defined in the applicable Nasdaq listing standards.

30


HOW OUR BOARD GOVERNS AND IS GOVERNED (continued)

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee is a separately-designated standing committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and currently consists of Ms. Southern (Chair), Ms. Staiblin and Mr. Sundström, each of whom are independent for purposes of the Nasdaq listing standards, our Rules of Procedure andRule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. In November 2019, Ms. Staiblin joined the Audit Committee in place of Mr. Goldman. Before September 1, 2019, the Audit Committee consisted of Ms. Southern (Chair), and Messrs. Goldman, Kaeser (until August 1, 2019) and Summe.

Subject to the requirement under Dutch law that independent auditors be appointed by the shareholders at a general meeting of shareholders, the Audit Committee has ultimate authority and direct responsibility to appoint, compensate, retain, oversee, evaluate and, where appropriate, replace the independent auditors. In addition, the Audit Committee reviews the performance and independence of the independent auditors and also oversees internal audit activities, compliance with the Code of Conduct, related-party transactions and legal matters, including litigation and intellectual property litigation.disputes.

Our Audit Committee reviews our annual audited financial statements and quarterly unaudited financial statements and certain other public disclosures prior to publication. The Audit Committee also meets periodically with senior management to discuss risk assessment and risk management policies.

The Board has determined that all Audit Committee members are able to read and understand fundamental financial statements in accordance with Nasdaq listing standards and that all three current members of the Audit Committee meet the SEC’s definition of “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined in Item 407(d) ofRegulation S-K. As noted above, all Audit Committee members are independent for purposes of Nasdaq listing standards, our Rules of Procedure, andRule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. For a description of the education and experience of each of the members of the Board’s Audit Committee please refer to the “Nominees for Director” section above.

The Audit Committee meets at least quarterly, and as often as it deems necessary to fulfill its responsibilities.

Number of meetings in 2019: 9.2021: 10.

This committee operates under a written charter adopted by our Board. The charter complies with SEC regulations and Nasdaq listing standards. The charter is reviewed and reassessed regularly to ensure continued compliance with these requirements. The charter is available for public viewing on our website athttp://investors.nxp.com, under the “Corporate Governance” section.

Human Resources and Compensation Committee

Our Human Resources and Compensation Committee currently consists of Mr. Smitham (Chair), Sir Peter Bonfield, Ms.Mses. Clayton and Olving and Mr. Sundström. As previously noted, Mr. Smitham is retiring from our Board at the expiration of his term at the end of the AGM and his service on the Human Resources and Compensation Committee will cease after the AGM. Our Board has determined that all of the members of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee are independent for purposes of Nasdaq listing standards, our Rules of Procedure and Rule10C-1 of the Exchange Act. Pursuant to its charter and the authority delegated to it by our Board, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing our compensation and employee benefit plans and practices, including formulating, evaluating and approving the compensation of our executive officers, including the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, and for overseeing all compensation programs involving the issuance of our equity securities. In addition, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the Company’s strategy, initiatives and programs related to the Company’s culture, talent management and talent development, including but not limited to talent acquisition, talent retention, talent development and succession, employee engagement, diversity, equality and inclusion. For more information regarding the Human Resources and Compensation Committee and the determination of executive compensation, see the “Executive Compensation” section below. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee meets as often as it deems necessary, but not less than four times a year.

21


HOW OUR BOARD GOVERNS AND IS GOVERNED (continued)

Number of meetings in 2019 (including meetings of the Nominating and Compensation Committee prior to September 1, 2019): 6.2021: 7.

This committee operates under a written charter adopted by our Board. The charter complies with SEC regulations and Nasdaq listing standards. The charter is reviewed and reassessed regularly to ensure continued compliance with these requirements. The charter is available for public viewing on our website athttp://investors.nxp.com, under the “Corporate Governance” section.

31


HOW OUR BOARD GOVERNS AND IS GOVERNED (continued)

Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committee

Our Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committee currently consists of Mr. Summe (Chair), Sir Peter Bonfield, Mr.Messrs. Foxx, Goldman and Kaeser. As previously noted, Messrs. Goldman and Kaeser are retiring from our Board at the expiration of their terms at the end of the AGM and Mr. Goldman.their service on the Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee will cease after the AGM. Our Board has determined that all of the members of the Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committee are independent for purposes of Nasdaq listing standards and our Rules of Procedure. Pursuant to its charter and the authority delegated to it by our Board, the Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committee is responsible for determining selection criteria and appointment procedures for members of our Board, periodically assessing the scope and composition of our Board and evaluating the performance of its individual members.

In identifying and evaluating candidates,addition, the Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committee may take into account all ofoversees the factors it considers appropriate, which may include: (i) whether the candidate is independent in accordance with any applicable independence requirements of NasdaqCompany’s corporate sustainability policies and our Rules of Procedure; (ii) the structure and membership of the Board; (iii) specific qualifications, expertise or experiences that would complement the existing Board members including education, financial expertise, and industry experience; (iv) a candidate’s personal traits such as mature judgment, diverse background, age, professional relationships, strength of character, level of integrity, ethical standards and other intangibles that would make the candidate a positive addition to the Board and its committees; and (v) special skills, expertise, and background that add to and complement the range of skills, expertise, and background of the existing members of the Board. When the committee considers diversity, it will consider diversity of experience, skills, viewpoints, race and gender, as it deems appropriate. While the committee has not established any specific minimum qualifications for director nominees, the committee believes that demonstrated leadership, as well as significant years of service, in an area of endeavor such as business, law, public service, related industry or academia is a desirable qualification for service as a director of NXP.programs.

The Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committee will consider timely written proposals for nomination from shareholders and will evaluate a shareholder’s prospective board nominee in the same manner that it evaluates other nominees, but only if it receives the request to consider such matter no later than on the 60th day prior to the day of the Annual General Meeting. The Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committee may engagefrom time to time engages consultants or third-party search firms to assist in identifying and evaluating potential nominees. A shareholder who wishes to recommend a prospective Board nominee for the committee’s consideration may write to us at NXP Semiconductors N.V., High Tech Campus 60, 5656 AG, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, Attention: Secretary. For more information regarding shareholder proposals and nominations see “Future Shareholder Proposals and Nominations for the 20202023 Annual General Meeting.”

The Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committee meets as often as it deems necessary to fulfill its responsibilities, but not less than four times a year. As the Nominating and Governance Committee only was installed in September 2019, the number

Number of meetings in 2019 was only 2.2021: 4.

This committee operates under a written charter adopted by our Board. The charter complies with SEC regulations and Nasdaq listing standards. The charter is reviewed and reassessed regularly to ensure continued compliance with these requirements. The charter is available for public viewing on our website athttp://investors.nxp.com, under the “Corporate Governance” section.

Information about each of the standing committees is provided on the following page and pages and page 24 provides34-36 provide an additional discussion of committee responsibilities in relation to risk oversight.

 

2232


HOW OUR BOARD GOVERNS AND IS GOVERNED (continued)

 

  
AUDIT COMMITTEE  

 

Members

Ms. Southern (Chair)

Ms. Staiblin

Mr. Sundström

  

 

KEY OVERSIGHT RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO:

 

  The integrity of the Company’s financial statements and its accounting and financial reporting processes

 

  The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting

 

  Compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements

 

  Oversight of information technology risks, including cybersecurity

The qualifications, independence and performance of the independent registered public accounting firm for U.S. public reporting purposes and the Company’s external auditor for purposes of Dutch law

 

  The Internal Audit group

 

  The Company’s processes and procedures related to risk assessment and risk management

 

  Related party transactions

 

Number of

meetings during 2019:2021:

  910

 

  
HUMAN RESOURCES AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE (until September  1, 2019 Nominating and Compensation Committee)  
  

Members

Mr. Smitham (Chair)

Sir Peter Bonfield

Ms. Clayton

Ms. Olving

Mr. Sundström

  

KEY OVERSIGHT RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO:

 

  CEO and senior management compensation, including the corporate goals and objectives relevant to such compensation and evaluating performance in light of those goals and objectives

 

  Board and committee compensation

 

  Relationship between the Company’s compensation policies and practices and risk management

 

  Compensation and benefits-related disclosuresManagement Team succession plans

 

  EquityCompensation and benefits-related disclosures and equity compensation plans in which executives participate

  Various human capital management topics, including diversity, equality and inclusion, workforce trends and surveys, as well as University Relations Program

 

Number of

meetings during 2019:2021:

  67

 

 

NOMINATING, GOVERNANCE AND GOVERNANCE SUSTAINABILITY

COMMITTEE (as of September 1, 2019)

  
  

Members

Mr. Summe (Chair)

Sir Peter Bonfield

Mr. Foxx

Mr. Goldman

Mr. Kaeser

  

KEY OVERSIGHT RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO:

 

  Corporate governance matters

 

  Nominationor re-nomination of director candidates and approval of other annual shareholders meeting agenda items

 

  The annual self-evaluation of the Board and its committees

 

  Review NXP top identified risks and make proposals to the Board on oversight

  Initiatives and reporting on Environment, Social and Governance

Number of

meetings during 2019:2021:

  24

 

2333


HOW OUR BOARD GOVERNS AND IS GOVERNED (continued)

 

Setting and Overseeing Strategy

The Board actively determines the Company’s strategy and continues to focus on those strategies designed to ensure the continued durability and sustainability of the Company, while creating long-term value for our shareholders, and serving the interests of our other stakeholders. The Board and its committees regularly and extensively reviewed during their meetings throughout 20192021 the Company’s strategy, the Company’s primary risks as well as the design and operation of the internal control systems to ensure it supports the long-term growth and sustainability of the Company and reflects, among other considerations, market challenges and opportunities, and the interests of shareholders and other stakeholders. This has substantially impacted the long-term value creation strategy as referred to in practice 1.1.1 of the DCGC. During 2019, specific attention has been paid to the leadership succession planning, which ultimately resultedDCGC as further outlined in the proposed appointment of Kurt Sievers as executive director, PresidentSustainability section and CEO, who will succeed Rick Clemmer who successfully ledin the company since 2009.Company’s Corporate Social Responsibility Report. In addition to quarterly updates on the business performance and detailed presentations by the various business managers, the Board, as part of its annual meeting schedule, spent afull-day full meeting in November to review and discuss themid- to long-term strategy of the Company.

The Board is committed to maintaining a dialogue with shareholders to ensure that they understand our differentiated strategy and business model and have an opportunity to discuss and engage on a broad range of topics, including our strategy. The Board will also reviewsreview the implementation of our strategy at our annual general meeting of shareholders, giving attendees the opportunity to discuss our annual Dutch board report and the accompanying financial statements prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union (“IFRS”). We also regularly discuss our strategy in shareholder engagement sessions.

Risk Oversight

Our management is directly responsible for executing the Company’s risk management processes. Our Board is responsible for overseeing these risk management processes. In exercising its oversight, the Board and, as appropriate, the relevant Board committees, assesses the material risks facing the Company and evaluate management’s plans for managing material risk exposures. The Company conducts a formal annual risk assessment to identify, analyze and report on enterprise risks. The results of this risk assessment are reported to and discussed with the Board.

Our Board performs this oversight function through periodic reports from management and Board committees. While our Board generally has ultimate oversight responsibility of the Company’s risk management processes, it has delegated to its committees the responsibility to oversee risk management processes associated with their respective areas of responsibility and expertise. For example, the Audit Committee has oversight responsibility for the Company’s internal audit function, compliance with the Code of Conduct, internal controls and financial reporting practices, information technology and cybersecurity risks, litigation, and compliance processes. The Company conducts a formal annual risk assessment to identify, analyzeHuman Resources and report on enterprise risks. The results of this risk assessment are reported to and discussed with the Audit Committee. The Compensation Committee has oversight responsibility for the Company’s executive talent management and succession planning, including executive succession, and risks related to the Company’s compensation policies and practices, as described in more detail in the Compensation Practices and Risk section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committee has oversight responsibility for the Company’s compliance with its corporate governance principles, CEO succession planning, the Company’s policies and leadership succession planning.practices relating to significant issues of sustainability environmental social and governance issues of concern and proposes recommendations to the Board for updates to risk oversight responsibilities of the committees and the Board. The Board receives regular reports from each committee chair regarding the committee’s considerations and actions. The Board also receives regular updates from management on the Company’s business operations, financial results and strategy and, as appropriate, discusses and provides feedback with respect to risks related to these topics. Annually, the Board holds strategic planning sessions with senior management to discuss strategies, key challenges, and risks and opportunities for our business.

NXP, similar to other semiconductor companies, operates in a complex and rapidly changing environment that involves many risks. In addition to general market, research and development, and economic risks, the Company faces potential risks related to its industry; information technology and cybersecurity; data privacy; financial controls and reporting; legal, regulatory and compliance; finances and taxation; global operations; environment and social responsibility; and product portfolio and commercialization,commercialization; and supply risks, among others. As a company committed to operating ethically and with integrity, we proactively seek to manage and, where possible, mitigate risks to help ensure compliance with applicable rules and regulations, maintain integrity and continuity in our operations and business and protect our assets. Risk management is an enterprise-wide objective subject to oversight by the Board and its committees.

It is the responsibility of management and employees to implement and administer risk-management processes to identify material risks to our business. In addition, management must assess, manage and monitor those risks, all while maintaining flexibility in how we operate. To further embed risk management and compliance into our culture, we implement relevant policies and procedures and train employees on the specifics of such policies and procedures. All of our committees have regular access to management and the Board and committees also schedule sessions without members of management present.

 

2434


HOW OUR BOARD GOVERNS AND IS GOVERNED (continued)

 

The purpose of our enterprise risk management (“ERM”) is to timely identify, evaluate, prioritize, respond to, and manage material business risks impacting NXP Semiconductors’ strategic objectives.

The objectives of ERM are to:

Enhance our understanding of risks across the organization and their impact on our strategy

Improve our ability to respond to risks, particularly those that could result in a strategic impact event

Ensure there is an effective system of management for key risks

Prioritize and align risk management efforts and resources effectively

Provide reasonable assurance, in line with the three lines of defense model, to stakeholders that we have a system in place to manage risk, comply with legal requirements and safeguard the integrity of the Company’s financial reporting and related disclosures.

Key ERM activities include:

Assessment (identification and evaluation of risks)

Response (building capabilities, mitigation)

Management Assurance (effective management methods, clear accountabilities)

Monitoring (audit, inquire, verify)

Communication (internally and externally)

Periodically evaluate effectiveness method

The procedures reflect a plan for reasonable coverage of the potential risks. Despite the thoroughness of the process unforeseen events that impact the strategy may happen.

Risk management governance

The Board of Directors oversees NXP’s processes and procedures related to risk assessment and risk management, reviews NXP top identified risks and the Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee makes proposals to the Board on oversight.

Our management team oversees, identifies and manages the top risks NXP faces in executing its strategy, defines the risk appetite and manages risks consistently with the risk appetite. The Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) function enables management to make risk management more efficient and effective by providing and maintaining a risk management framework, a risk monitoring mechanism and facilitation of the execution of the ERM process to mitigate the risks to levels consistent with the risk appetite of NXP. We believe that our risk appetite is consistent with our peers in the semiconductor industry and a reflection of the risk in the semiconductor industry. This risk appetite varies depending on the different identified risks and therefore the level of mitigation can be different. For mitigation of the operational, financial disclosure and compliance risk we merely rely on our framework of business controls, processes, authorizations. We also follow the “tone at the top” principle, which says that, when management upholds honesty, integrity, and ethics, employees are more likely to do the same. This top-down approach is especially relevant to mitigation of more strategic risks.

A risk owner performs an assessment and prioritizes the most likely and impactful risk elements and takes appropriate measures to mitigate the risk within the given appetite. The Internal Audit function, as part of annual audit plan approved by the Audit Committee, provides assurance of effectiveness of NXP’s risk management. A structured risk management process is put in place to identify and manage the most crucial risks for NXP, taking into account both internal and external information sources. The ERM process contains the following elements:

Yearly interviews with all NXP Management Team (“MT”) members, starting from the strategy and seeking their insight in the most important risks for NXP

Assessment of a consolidated risk list on both likelihood and impact by different layers in the organization

35


HOW OUR BOARD GOVERNS AND IS GOVERNED (continued)

Based on likelihood and impact, the top risk list is (re-)confirmed by the MT and reported to the Board of Directors

Risk owners drive required mitigation actions to ensure the risk meets the risk specific appetite

Corrective actions are taken where necessary as a result of evaluation of the controls by internal audit and/or self-assessments

Effectiveness of the controls are measured by specified risk indicators, updated on at least a quarterly basis

Risk status and controls in place are discussed each quarter in Board or the selected board committee meetings

At least once per year, the risk process is reviewed with the Board of Directors regarding effectiveness and improved where needed.

Information Technology Risks

The Company’s Audit Committee has oversight responsibility for reviewing the effectiveness of NXP’s governance and management information technology risks, including those relating to business continuity, cybersecurity, malware, regulatory compliance and data management. NXP senior leadership briefs the Audit Committee quarterly on information security matters and briefs the full Board on information security matters at least annually. NXP is certified and externally audited to ISO 27001 with certain additional certifications such as Common Criteria 6+, PCI DSS and GSMA Security for focused functions, and we maintain information security risk insurance coverage. We have multiple cybersecurity training initiatives as part of our information security training and compliance program. We deploy simulated attacks and related trainings at least quarterly. We deliver a Cyber Security orientation to all of our new employees and maintain a library of cyber security learning sessions available to our team members.

NXP uses a multi-layer approach to identify and mitigate information security risks. On a tactical level, NXP maintains a 24x7 Security Operating Center (SOC) that actively monitors for and identifies cyber security threats and initiates appropriate mitigation processes. The SOC reports to Computer Security Incident Response Team (CSIRT). When needed a task force containing Security, IT, Communications, Legal and Business representatives is established. This task force leads mitigation activities where the potential threat or risk is elevated. In addition to SOC the NXP IT Service Desk and NXP team members are trained to identify Cyber Security issues and to escalate them to correct owners. On a strategic level, NXP’s information technology risk management program is a component of the ERM process described above. NXP’s Chief Information Security Officer manages the information security risks identified in the ERM process, performing an initial risk assessment, prioritizing the most likely and impactful risk elements and recommending appropriate measures to mitigate the risk. This assessment and recommended mitigation strategies are validated and refined by senior leadership and reviewed in quarterly meetings with the Audit Committee and annually with the full Board.

The Board, in turn, directly or through its committees, oversees management’s implementation of risk management. We have approved a robust Code of Conduct and other related policies, and the Board and its committees rigorously review with management actual and potential significant risks at least on a quarterly basis.

Board Education

Individual members of the Board participate in director educationaleducation seminars, conferences and other director education programs presented by external and internal resources, on matters that relate to, among other topics, compensation, governance, board process,processes, risk oversight, business, industry, audit and accounting, credit and financial, regulatory and other current issues. The Company organizedIn August 2021, the two newly appointed members of the Board participated in August 2019an induction program, where they received atwo-day Induction Program for newly elected directors. A number of directors that were elected in previous years also participated in the Induction Program. Various management members gavein-depthpresentations on the Company’s strategy, including presentations on the finance organization and reporting, legal, intellectual property, corporate governance, human resources, internal audit and sales and marketing.various topics by members of management.

36


HOW OUR DIRECTORS ARE SELECTED AND EVALUATED

Consideration of Director Nominees

For purposes of identifying individuals qualified to become members of the Board, the Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committee considers the following general criteria, among others, in nominating director candidates. These criteria reflect the traits, abilities and experience that the Board looks for in determining candidates for election:

 

Directors shall have relevant expertise and experience and be able to offer advice and guidance to the President and CEO based on that expertise and experience;

 

Directors shall have the ability to exercise sound business judgment;

 

Directors shall represent diverse viewpoints; the personal backgrounds and qualifications of the directors, considered as a group, should provide the Company with a significant composite mix of experience, knowledge and abilities; and

 

Unless otherwise approved by the Board, directors shall not be a member of the board of directors or an officer or employee of a competitor (or an affiliate of a competitor) of the Company.

In addition to the criteria set forth above, and any others the Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committee or the Board may consider, a majority of the Board’s members must be “independent,” as that term may be defined from time to time by the applicable Nasdaq listing standards, the Rules of Procedure, as well as practice 2.1.8 of the DCGC, including that an independent director must be free of any relationships which, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

As needed, the Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committee may identify new potential director nominees by, among other means, requesting current directors and executive officers and external advisors to notify it if they become aware of persons meeting the criteria described above who would be suitable candidates for service on the Board. The committee also may, as needed, engage one or more firms that specialize in identifying director candidates.

As appropriate, the Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committee will review publicly available information regarding a potential candidate, request information from the candidate, review the candidate’s experience and qualifications, including in light of any other candidates the committee might be considering, and conduct, together with other members of the Board, one or more interviews with the candidate. Committee members or their designees also may contact one or more references provided by the candidate or may contact other members of the business community or persons who may have first-hand knowledge of the candidate’s talents and experience.

25


HOW OUR DIRECTORS ARE SELECTED AND EVALUATED (continued)

Diversity

The Board is committed to supporting, valuing and leveraging diversity, including gender and ethnic/cultural diversity, in its composition, among other qualities that the Board believes serve the best interests of the Company and its stakeholders. As part of these efforts, the Company’s policy to appoint a well-balanced mix of women and men to its Board, while taking into account the overall profile and selection criteria for appointments of suitable candidates, has proposed a slate of nominees to the Board after the appointment by shareholdersin which at the general meetingleast 40% of shareholders of June 17, 2019 of Mses. Olvingdirector nominees are women and Staiblin,that includes one or more director nominees from an underrepresented ethnic group. The Board aims to continue in its efforts to have a diverse gender and ethnic composition as nominated by theit continues its board 30% of the seats of the Board are now taken by women.refreshment process.

Board Refreshment

The Board, with the support of the Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committee, maintains an orderly, robust process for Board refreshment and succession that is aimed at maintaining an appropriate balance with respect to the expertise, experience and diversity on the Board. The Board and its Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committee regularly evaluates the Board composition with respect to, among other matters, director independence, skills, experience, expertise, diversity and other factors to ensure the Board remains well-qualified to provide effective oversight of the Company and management. The Board and the Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committee regularly consider the Company’s strategy, performance, operations, relevant industry and market conditions, and current and anticipated needs in terms of particular areas of experience and expertise (e.g., risk oversight, industry, science), among many other factors, to inform these refreshment practices.

The Board continues its orderly Board succession and refreshment process, refreshing six director seats since 2015, including this year’s new executive director nominee.

37


HOW OUR DIRECTORS ARE SELECTED AND EVALUATED (continued)

The Board also remains focused on committee composition and refreshment. In August 2018, the Board refreshed the chairs of the then two Board committees (the Audit Committee and the Nominating and Compensation Committee) and, following the installment of the Nominating and Governance Committee in September 2019, the Board refreshed the composition of all three committees.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Under the Rules of Procedure, a conflict needs toof interest must be reported to the Board and the Board shall resolve ondetermine the consequences of such conflict, if any. In case of a conflict of interest, the director concerned is not allowed to participate in discussions or vote on such matter. If all directors have a conflict of interest, the resolution concerned will be adoptedvoted on by shareholders at the general meeting of shareholders.

Other than the compensation items described below, no decisions to enter into material transactions in which there arewere conflicts of interest with directors have occurred during the financial year 2019.2021.

 

2638


HOW OUR DIRECTORS ARE COMPENSATED

Non-Employee Director Compensation for 20192021

The Human Resources and Compensation Committee has responsibility for reviewing and considering any revisions to compensation fornon-executive directors. The Board reviews the Human Resources and Compensation Committee’s recommendations and makes the final determination regarding compensation fornon-executive directors. In accordance with Dutch law,recommendation to the remuneration of thenon-executive directors of the Board’s committees has been set for the last time at the annual general meeting of shareholders held in 2016. Since September 2019, the Board has three—instead of two—permanent committees (the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee), which is reasonregarding compensation for the Board to consider it advisable tore-setnon-executive the committee membership remuneration to conform to market levels. Refer to Item 9 below for the board proposals to the Annual General Meeting to set revised committee membership fees.directors. It is our policy to reimburse all directors for reasonable expenses incurred in performing their duties as a director.

Cash Compensation

Sir Peter Bonfield, receives an annual fixed fee of275,000 for serving asnon-executive director and chairmanChair of the board.Board. The othernon-executive directors receive an annual fixed fee of $85,000. Subject to the approval of the Annual General Meeting to be held on May 27, 2020 as further explained in Item 9, membersMembers of the Audit Committee, Human Resources and Compensation Committee and Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committee receive an additional annual fixed fee of $15,000 and the chairsChairs of each of these committees receive an additional annual fixed fee of $15,000.

Equity Compensation

In 2019,2021, eachnon-executive director received an annual restricted share unit award with a grant value of $200,000.$225,000. The awards were granted at the same time as the NXP annual equity grants for NXP employees in November, and the restricted share units fully vest on the earlier of the first anniversary of the date of grant or the next annual general meeting of shareholders. Unvested portions of their equity award are forfeited upon the termination of anon-executive director’s service on the Board, except in the case of termination of service upon death or at the request of the Board, in which case the unvested portion is fully accelerated.

Share Ownership Guidelines

Members of our Board are subject to share ownership guidelines.Non-executive directors are prohibited from selling any shares of the Company until they own shares that are valued at no less than five times the annual cash fixed fee paid to the director. Our executive director and President/President and CEO is subject to the share ownership guidelines described in Item 119 below.

Non-Executive Director Compensation in 2019

Name

  Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash ($)
   Stock Awards
($)(1)
   Total
($)
   Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash ($)(1)
   Stock Awards
($)(2)
   Total
($)
 

Sir Peter Bonfield

   326,275    195,031    521,306   $ 354,995   $220,289   $575,284 

Annette Clayton(3)

  $60,000   $220,289   $280,289 

Anthony Foxx(3)

  $60,000   $220,289   $280,289 

Kenneth A. Goldman

   100,000    195,031    295,031   $100,000   $220,289   $320,289 

Josef Kaeser

   98,750    195,031    293,781   $100,000   $220,289   $320,289 

Lena Olving2

   50,569    195,031    245,600 

Lena Olving

  $100,000   $220,289   $320,289 

Peter Smitham

   111,667    195,031    306,698   $115,000   $220,289   $335,289 

Julie Southern

   115,000    195,031    310,031   $115,000   $220,289   $335,289 

Jasmin Staiblin2

   50,569    195,031    245,600 

Jasmin Staiblin

  $100,000   $220,289   $320,289 

Gregory Summe

   113,000    195,031    308,031   $115,000   $220,289   $335,289 

Karl-Henrik Sundström2

   55,569    195,031    250,600 

Johannes Huth3

   44,997        44,997 

Eric Meurice3

   39,431        39,431 

Karl-Henrik Sundström

  $115,000   $220,289   $335,289 

 

1. 

On October 29, 2019, Sir Peter Bonfield, Messrs. Foxx, Goldman, Kaeser, Smitham, Summe and Sundström and Mses. Clayton, Olving, Southern and Staiblin’s cash compensation and Sir Peter Bonfield’s committee fees are determined in dollars and paid in Euros using the exchange rate at the time of payment. Sir Peter Bonfield’s annual fixed fee is determined and paid in Euros; his fee has been converted to dollars using an exchange rate of 1.1818.

2.

On November 2, 2021, Sir Peter Bonfield, Messrs. Foxx, Goldman, Kaeser, Smitham, Summe and Sundström and Mses. Clayton, Olving, Southern and Staiblin each received an annual restricted share unitsunit (‘RSUs’RSU’) grant of 1,7491,090 under the terms of the NXP Semiconductors N.V. 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan and the Director Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement. The values in this column represent the grant date fair value of the RSU awards calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). See noteNote 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies ‘Share-based Compensation’compensation’ and Note 18—17—Share-based Compensation,compensation, both found in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20192021 for additional information. As of December 31, 2019,2021, Sir Peter Bonfield, Messrs. Foxx, Goldman, Kaeser, Smitham, Summe and Sundström and Mses. Clayton, Olving, Southern and Staiblin each held 1,7491,090 RSUs and nonon-employee director held options.

2.3.

Mses. Olving and StaiblinMs. Clayton and Mr. Sundström received a prorated portion of their annual feesFoxx were appointed as a result of their appointment asnon-executive directors at the 2019 annual general meeting of shareholders (the “2019 AGM”).

3.

Messrs. Huth and Meurice received a prorated portion of their annual fees as a result of their decision not to stand forre-election to the Board at the 2019 AGM.2021 AGM held on May 26, 2021.

 

2739


ITEM 4: AUTHORIZATION OF THE BOARD TO ISSUE ORDINARY SHARES AND GRANT RIGHTS TO ACQUIRE ORDINARY SHARES

The Board considers it in the best interest of the Company and its stakeholders for the Board to be able to react in a timely manner when strategic business opportunities arise that require the issuance of ordinary shares. For example, this designation has been used in the past in relation to the issuance of convertible bonds in 2014.

At the 20192021 AGM, the shareholders authorized the Board to issue ordinary shares and to grant rights to acquire ordinary shares equal to 10% of the issued share capital for a period of 18 months, effective from June 17, 2019 to December 17, 2020,May 26, 2021 until November 26, 2022, and to excludepre-emptive rights in connection with such issue or grant of rights. It is proposed to renew thisthe authorization to issue ordinary shares and to grant rights to acquire ordinary shares for a new period of 18 months, effective from May 27, 2020June 1, 2022 until November 27, 2021,December 1, 2023, and up to 10% of the issued share capital. The Company’s issued share capital as of March 29, 202024, 2022,was 315,519,638274,519,638 ordinary shares.

Although we presently do not have specific plans to issue ordinary shares for any purpose, the Board believes that it is advisable and in the best interest of our shareholders for our shareholders to provide this general authorization in order to avoid the delay and expense of obtaining shareholder approval at a later date, and to provide us with greater flexibility to pursue financing opportunities, such as the issuance of convertible notes, or acquisitions when market conditions are favorable.

The issuance of a large number of ordinary shares could be dilutive to existing shareholders or reduce the trading price of our shares on Nasdaq.

Therefore, in accordance with standard Dutch practice, it is proposed to grant the Board the authorization to issue ordinary shares and grant rights to acquire ordinary shares (up to 10% of the issued share capital as per June 1, 2022) for a period of 18 months, effective from June 1, 2022 until December 1, 2023, within the limits provided in the Articles of Association, (up to 10% of the issued share capital), which authorization can be used for general purposes. If this proposal is approved the prior authorization (from the 20192021 AGM) will immediately expire.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE PROPOSAL TO AUTHORIZE THE BOARD TO ISSUE ORDINARY SHARES AND GRANT RIGHTS TO ACQUIRE ORDINARY SHARES.

ITEM 5: AUTHORIZATION OF THE BOARD TO RESTRICT OR EXCLUDEPRE-EMPTION RIGHTS ACCRUING IN CONNECTION WITH AN ISSUE OF SHARES OR GRANT OF RIGHTS

To the extent that the Board issues ordinary shares or grants rights to acquire ordinary shares under the authorization as set out in itemItem 4, it is proposed to authorize the Board for a period of 18 months, effective from the Annual General Meeting,June 1, 2022 until December 1, 2023, to restrict or excludepre-emption rights accruing in connection with such issuance. In accordance with Dutch law, if less than 50% of the issued capital is represented at the Annual General Meeting, this proposal can only be adopted by a majority of at leasttwo-thirds of the votes cast. If 50%issuance or more of the issued capital is represented, a simple majority is sufficient to adopt this proposal.grant.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE PROPOSAL TO AUTHORIZE THE BOARD TO RESTRICT OR EXCLUDEPRE-EMPTION RIGHTS ACCRUING IN CONNECTION WITH AN ISSUE OF SHARES OR GRANT OF RIGHTS.

 

2840


ITEM 6: AUTHORIZATION OF THE BOARD TO REPURCHASE ORDINARY SHARES OF THE COMPANY

At the 20192021 AGM, shareholders authorized the Board to acquire ordinary shares in the Company’s capital for a period of 18 months. It is proposed to renew and revise this authorization for a period of 18 months from the Annual General Meeting, as set out below.

The purpose of this Item is to create flexibility to return capital to the shareholders and to cover obligations of the Company to deliver ordinary shares. In addition to being a means to return value to shareholders, repurchases of shares of the Company’s own share capital could be used by the Board to demonstrate a commitment to the Company’s business and confidence in the long-term growth of NXP, provide increased liquidity for investors and cover obligations under the Company’s share-based compensation plans. Since 2017, the Company has returned $7.128$12.752 billion to shareholders through previously announced share repurchases and dividend payments, reducing our diluted share count by approximately 1720 percent, or 6070.1 million shares.

The number of ordinary shares to be repurchased, if any, and the timing and manner of any repurchases will be determined after taking into consideration, amongst other things, prevailing market conditions and available resources. Under Dutch law, the number of shares held by the Company and its subsidiaries may not exceed 50% of the issued share capital.

As perof March 29, 202024, 2022 the Company holds 36,518,52011,966,950 treasury shares or 11.64.4 percent of the issued share capital. The Board considers it desirable to propose to the shareholders create the flexibility to continue with share repurchases. As such, it is proposed to the shareholders to authorize the Board for a period of 18 months, with effect from the Annual General Meeting, to repurchase ordinary shares up to 10% of the issued share capital as per the date of the Annual General Meeting. Shares may only be repurchased pursuant to this authorization so long as the total number of shares held by the Company in treasury does not exceed 20% of the Company’s issued share capital. The repurchases may take place on the open market, through privately negotiated repurchases, in self-tender offers, or through accelerated repurchase arrangements. Such repurchases may be made at prices ranging between0.01 and a price equal to 110% of the market price of the ordinary shares on Nasdaq, market price being the average of the closing prices for the ordinary shares on Nasdaq on the five trading days prior to the date of the acquisition, provided that (i) for self-tender offers, the market price shall be the volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) for the ordinary shares on Nasdaq during a period, determined by the Board, of no less than one trading day and no greater than five trading days prior to the expiration of the tender offer, and (ii) for accelerated repurchase arrangements, the market price shall be the VWAP for the ordinary shares on Nasdaq over the term of the arrangement. If this authorization is granted, the existing authorization as granted in 20192021 will cease to apply as per the moment this authorization takes effect.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE PROPOSAL TO AUTHORIZE THE BOARD TO REPURCHASE THE COMPANY’S ORDINARY SHARES.

ITEM 7: AUTHORIZATION OF THE BOARD TO CANCEL THE COMPANY’S ORDINARY SHARES HELD OR TO BE ACQUIRED

It is proposed to authorize the Board to cancel any or all ordinary shares in the share capital of the Company held or repurchased by the Company resulting in a reduction of the Company’s issued ordinary shares. The cancellation may be executed in one or more tranches. The number of ordinary shares that will be cancelled (whether or not in a tranche) will be determined by the Board, with a maximum equal to the number of ordinary shares that may be acquired pursuant to Item 6.held or repurchased by the Company in its issued share capital.

Pursuant to Dutch law, cancellation may not be effected earlier than two months after the resolution to cancel ordinary shares is adopted and publicly announced; this will apply for each tranche. The purpose of this proposal is to authorize the cancellation of ordinary shares held by the Company or that have been acquired in accordance with Item 6, to the extent that such ordinary shares shall not be used to cover obligations under share-based remuneration or other obligations.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE PROPOSAL TO AUTHORIZE THE BOARD TO CANCEL THE COMPANY’S ORDINARY SHARES HELD OR TO BE ACQUIRED.

 

2941


ITEM 8: APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG ACCOUNTANTS LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR A THREE-YEAR PERIOD, STARTING WITH THE 2020 FISCAL YEAR

In accordance with the procedures set forth in the Company’s policy on auditor independence, the Audit Committee conducted a competitive process to determine the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm as referred to in Article 32 of the Articles for the Company’s fiscal years ending December 31, 2020 through December 31, 2022. The Company invited several independent registered public accounting firms to participate in this process.

As a result of the review of proposals from the independent registered public accounting firms that participated, on November 19, 2019, the Board as advised by the Audit Committee determined to recommend that Ernst & Young Accountants LLP (“E&Y”) stand for appointment as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the Company’s fiscal years ending December 31, 2020 through December 31, 2022 at the 2020 AGM under the requirement under Dutch law and as set forth in the Articles, subject to the completion of E&Y’s standard client acceptance procedures.

During the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, and the subsequent interim period through the date hereof, neither the Company nor anyone acting on its behalf consulted with E&Y regarding (i) the application of accounting principles to a specific transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, and no written report or oral advice was provided to the Company that E&Y concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing, or financial reporting issue, or (ii) any matters that were the subject of a disagreement within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of RegulationS-K and the related instructions, or (iii) any reportable event within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(v) of RegulationS-K.

Representatives of both KPMG and E&Y will participate in the 2020 AGM, will be available to respond to appropriate questions from our stockholders and may make a statement if they desire to do so.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

KPMG has been the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, as referred to in Article 32 of the Company’s articles of association (the “Articles”), since 2009. KPMG was the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm until the completion of KPMG’s audit of the Company’s statutory annual accounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019 prepared in accordance with IFRS and consolidated financial statements in conformity with US GAAP as of and for the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2019.

The aggregate fees for professional services rendered by KPMG to NXP were $4.9 million for 2019 and $5.4 million for 2018.

Auditors’ Fees

The following table shows the fees for professional audit services rendered by KPMG for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of our interim financial statements for 2019 and 2018, and fees for other services rendered by KPMG for 2019 and 2018:

   Year Ended December 31, 

Fees

  

2019

(in millions)

   2018
(in millions)
 

Audit Fees(1)

  $4.7   $5.3 

Audit-Related Fees(2)

   0.2    0.1 

Tax Fees

        

All Other Fees

        

Total Fees

  $4.9   $5.4 

(1)

Audit fees relate to professional services rendered in connection with the audit of NXP’s annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, quarterly review of financial statements, and audit services provided in connection with other statutory and regulatory filings

(2)

Audit-related fees relate to professional services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of NXP’s financial statements.

30


ITEM 8: APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG ACCOUNTANTS LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR A THREE-YEAR PERIOD, STARTING WITH THE 2020 FISCAL YEAR (continued)

Audit CommitteePre-Approval Policies

The Audit Committee has adopted rules for thepre-approval by the Audit Committee of all services to be provided by the external auditor. Proposed services may bepre-approved at the beginning of the year by the Audit Committee (annualpre-approval) or may bepre-approved during the year in respect of a particular engagement (specificpre-approval). Thepre-approval is based on a detailed, itemized list of services to be provided, designed to ensure that there is no management discretion in determining whether a service has been approved and to ensure the Audit Committee is informed of each service it ispre-approving. Unless covered by thepre-approved services, each proposed service requires specificpre-approval during the year. Anypre-approved services where the fee for the engagement is expected to exceedpre-approved cost levels or budgeted amounts will also require specificpre-approval. During 2019, there were no services provided to the Company by the external auditors which were notpre-approved by the Audit Committee.

In 2019, the external auditor attended all formal meetings of the Audit Committee. The findings of the external auditor, the audit approach and the risk analysis are also discussed at these meetings. The external auditor also refers in its reporting to the Audit Committee of the Board to the financial reporting risks and issues that were identified during the audit, internal control matters, and any other matters, as appropriate, requiring communication under the auditing standards generally accepted in The Netherlands and the United States.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG ACCOUNTANTS LLP AS NXP’S INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2020, 2021 AND 2022.

ITEM 9: REMUNERATION OF THE MEMBERS AND CHAIRS OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE, THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE, AND THE NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD

In accordance with Dutch law, the remuneration of thenon-executive directors of the Board’s committees has been set for the last time at the annual general meeting of shareholders held in 2016. Since then, in September 2019, the Board installed three permanent committees (the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee), which is reason for the Board to consider it advisable tore-set the committee membership remuneration to conform to market levels.

The board proposes to the Annual General Meeting to set the following committee membership fees, applicable as of September 1, 2019:

Members of all permanent committees (the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee) will receive an annual fixed fee of $15,000; and

Chairs of all permanent committees will receive, in addition to their committee annual fixed fee remuneration, an annual fixed Chair fee of $15,000.

No further changes in cash remuneration or equity grants to members of the Board are proposed.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE REMUNERATION OF THE MEMBERS AND CHAIRS OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE, THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE AND THE NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD.

31


ITEM 10: AMENDMENT OF THE COMPANY’S ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION

Effective August 1, 2019, the Company has elected to transition to U.S. domestic filer status under the U.S. federal securities laws and to cease making use of the “foreign private issuer” accommodations. As part of this transition, we also had to comply with a Nasdaq listing standard that the Company’sby-laws provide for a quorum of at least 33 1/3 percent of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common voting stock.

Given that Dutch law does not requireby-laws, in November 2019 the Board inserted in its Rules of Procedure a requirement that the chair of the shareholder meeting would not hold the meeting unless shareholders representing at least 33 1/3 of outstanding issued share capital were either physically present or represented by proxy. As a next step, the Board also wants to reflect in the Articles of Association that the quorum requirement is at a level high enough to ensure that generally a broad range of shareholders are represented in person or by proxy. In line with best practices, the Board proposes a quorum of more than 50% of the issued and outstanding shares.

The Board proposes to the Annual General Meeting to make the following amendment—new proposed text underscored—of the Articles of Association (in the English and Dutch text):

English textDutch (leading) tekst:
28.1Subject to any provision of mandatory law and any higher quorum requirement stipulated by the Articles of Association, the General Meeting can only pass resolutions if at least the majority of the issued and outstanding shares in the Company’s capital are present or represented at such General Meeting. A second meeting as referred to in Section 2:120(3) DCC cannot be convened.28.1Met inachtneming van enige dwingende bepaling van de wet en enig hoger quorum bedongen in deze Statuten, kan de Algemene Vergadering slechts besluiten nemen indien meer dan helft van de geplaatste en uitstaande aandelen in het kapitaal van de Vennootschap aanwezig of vertegenwoordigd is in de Algemene Vergadering.
Resolutions proposed to the General Meeting by the Board shall be adopted by a simple majority unless the law or the Articles of Association determine otherwise. Unless another majority of votes or quorum is required by virtue of the law, all other resolutions shall be adopted by at least a two thirds majority of the votes cast, provided such majority represents at least half of the issued share capital.Besluiten op voorstel van het Bestuur worden door de Algemene Vergadering genomen bij volstrekte meerderheid van de uitgebrachte stemmen, tenzij de Statuten of de wet anders bepalen. Tenzij de wet een andere meerderheid of quorum voorschrijft, worden alle overige besluiten genomen met een tweederde meerderheid van stemmen, welke meerderheid ten minste de helft van het geplaatste kapitaal vertegenwoordigt.
For the purpose of this paragraph 28.1, a second meeting referred to in article 120, paragraph 3 of Book 2 Dutch Civil Codecannot be convened.”Voor de toepassing van dit artikel 28.1 kan een tweede vergadering als bedoeld in artikel 120, lid 3 van Boek 2 Burgerlijk Wetboekniet worden gehouden.”

Shareholders at the Annual General Meeting will only be able to resolve to amend the Articles of Association at the proposal of the Board. A proposal to amend the Articles of Association whereby any change would be made in the rights which vest in the holders of shares of a specific class in their capacity as such, shall require the prior approval of the meeting of holders of the shares of that specific class.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE AMENDMENT OF THE COMPANY’S ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION.

32


ITEM 11:NON-BINDING, ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

We are providing the followingnon-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as required under Section 14A of the Exchange Act. We are requesting our shareholders to approve, on anon-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis (“CD&A”), related compensation disclosure tables and narrative disclosures of this proxy statement.

For the reasons more fully discussed in the CD&A, the Board unanimously recommends a vote “For” the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the shareholders approve, on anon-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of RegulationS-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the accompanying compensation tables and related narrative disclosure in this proxy statement.”

You may vote “For” or “Against” this proposal, or you may abstain from voting. Although the vote on this Item 118 is advisory andnon-binding, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee and the Board will review the voting results on the proposal and will consider shareholder views in connection with our executive compensation program. For shareholders to adopt thenon-binding resolution approving the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, a majority of the votes cast must vote “For” this proposal. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will be entirely excluded from the vote and will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal. The Board has determined that the current frequency of our “say-on-pay” advisory vote shall be annually, and the next “say-on-pay” advisory vote will be held at our 2023 AGM.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THENON-BINDING, ADVISORY VOTE ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 

Richard L. Clemmer (1951, American). Mr. Clemmer became executive director and Chief Executive Officer of NXP on January 1, 2009. Mr. Clemmer will be succeeded as Chief Executive Officer by Kurt Sievers immediately after the AGM and will not stand forre-election as executive director at the AGM. Prior to his role as Chief Executive Officer, he was a senior advisor to KKR & Co., Inc., a private equity firm, a position he held from May 2007 to December 2008. Mr. Clemmer previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Agere Systems Inc., an integrated circuits components company that was acquired in 2007 by LSI Logic Corporation, from October 2005 to April 2007. Mr. Clemmer is a member of the board of directors and Chairman of Privafy, Inc., a security SaaS company, and he is a member of the board of directors of NCR Corporation and HP Inc.

Kurt Sievers (1969, German). Mr. Sievers is currentlyexecutive director, president and memberchief executive officer since May 2020, after a successful track record as the president of the management team,NXP, overseeing all of the company’s business lines. As discussed above, Mr. Sievers was nominated by the Board for appointment as executive director in connection with his appointment as Chief Executive Officer. In addition, he is Managing Director at NXP Semiconductors Germany GmbH.lines, since 2018. Mr. Sievers joined NXP in 1995, and rapidly moved through a series of Marketing & Sales, Product Definition & Development, Strategy and General Management leadership positions across a broad number of market segments. He has been a member of the executive management team since 2009, where he has been instrumental in the definition and implementation of the NXP High-Performance Mixed Signal strategy. In 2015, Mr. Sievers was influential in the merger of NXP and Freescale Semiconductor. Mr. Sievers serves on the Boardboard of the German National Electrical and Electronics Industry Association (ZVEI), the Global Semiconductor Alliance (GSA) and chairsCapgemini S.E.. Mr. Sievers is president of ESIA (European Semiconductor Industry Association). He chaired the Advisory Boardadvisory board of the international trade-fair Electronica.Electronica until June 2021. He also serves as a board member of PENTA and AENEAS, the clustersan industrial association for application and technology research in Europe on nano-electronics. In his role as managing director for NXP Germany,Mr. Sievers serves as a member of the Asia-Pacific-Committee of German Business (APA) and as a member of the Boardboard at the German Asia-Pacific Business Association (OAV), acting as the spokesperson for the Republic of Korea.

Mr. Sievers earned a master’s degree in physics and information technology from Augsburg University, Germany.

 

Peter KellyBill Betz (1957, (1977, American). Mr. KellyBetz is executive vice president, chief financial officer and a member of the management team. He joined NXP in March 2011In this role, he is responsible for all aspects of the company’s financial and serves as NXP’s chief financial officer.accounting functions including treasury, investor relations, audit, tax and mergers and acquisitions. Mr. KellyBetz has over 30more than 20 years of applicablefinance experience in the global technologysemiconductor industry with a strong track record focused on results. Prior to joining NXP in 2013 he held several financial leadership positions with Fairchild Semiconductors, LSI Logic and Agere Systems. Prior to being named CFO in October 2021, Mr. Betz was senior vice president, business planning & analytics and finance business group controller for NXP’s business lines and shared service centers, and led the corporate financial planning, analysis and business intelligence teams. Mr. Betz holds a Master of Business Administration from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business and a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from West Virginia University.

Christopher Jensen (1969, American). Mr. Jensen is executive vice president, chief human resources officer and a member of the management team and has extensive financial expertise having workedserved in financial management positions in several other companies, including as CFO of UGI Corp. and Agere Systems Inc. Mr. Kelly also serves on the board andthis role since June 2020. In this role, he is Chairresponsible for all aspects of the Audit Committee of Plexus, Corp.Company’s global human resources function, the Company’s people strategy and fostering an inclusive culture to achieve NXP’s business objectives.

 

3342


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (continued)

 

Mr. Jensen has been with NXP since the merger with Freescale in 2015 and was integral to the cultural integration of the two companies. He has extensive experience in leading the various functions across human resources, with strength in change management, compensation and benefits design, and mergers and acquisitions. Prior to Freescale, Mr. Jensen held executive human resources positions at Applied Materials and Tandem Computers. Mr. Jensen also serves as an adjunct professor at Baylor University, teaching in their Executive MBA Program.

Andrew Micallef (1965, American). Mr. Micallef is executive vice president of global operations at NXP and a member of the management team. He joined NXP in May 2021 and is responsible for creating and executing NXP’s end-to-end manufacturing, quality and supply chain strategies. Mr. Micallef has more than 20 years of semiconductor industry experience, including senior operational roles overseeing manufacturing, procurement, supply chain management, logistics, quality, product and test engineering, information technology and facilities. Prior to NXP, Mr. Micallef was chief operations officer for Marvell. Prior to that, he held operations leadership roles at Intersil Corporation, Audience, LSI Corporation and Agere Systems.

Stephen Owen (1960, Dutch). Mr. Owen is executive vice president, global sales & marketing and member of the management team. He has extensive experience in developing business internationally and served in various marketing and sales leadership positions at NXP and Philips since 1998.

 

David Reed (1958, American). Mr. Reed is executive vice president of Technology and Operations at NXP. He joined NXP in 2015, having served as general manager at Freescale until the merger with NXP. He has 30 years of extensive international experience with global execution of fabs, assembly/test, packaging, R&D, foundries and joint ventures for Analog, Automotive, Logic and Wireless customers. He joined Freescale Semiconductor in 2012 as Senior Vice President, Manufacturing Operations. Previously he was vice president and general manager at GLOBALFOUNDRIES. He began his career at Texas Instruments in 1984 where he held multiple overseas and leadership assignments.

Keith Shull (1951, American). Mr. Shull is executive vice president and chief human resources officer for NXP. He joined NXP in 2015 and has over 35 years of experience, having led global HR organizations in a range of industries worldwide, including Arrow Electronics, Visteon and Walter Energy.

Jennifer Wuamett (1965, American). Ms. Wuamett is executive vice president, general counsel, corporate secretary of our board of directors and member of the management team andchief sustainablity officer, she has served in this roleas executive vice president, general counsel and corporate secretary since September 2018.2018 and as chief sustainablility officer since March 2022. In these roles Ms. Wuamett is responsible for worldwide legal, governance, compliance and intellectual property matters for NXP and is also responsible for oversight of NXP’s ESG and risk programs. Previously, Ms. Wuamett served as Senior Vice Presidentsenior vice president and Deputy General Counseldeputy general counsel at NXP. Prior to that, she was Freescale’s Senior Vice President, General Counselsenior vice president, general counsel and Secretarysecretary and has served in various other positions at Freescale and Motorola sincebeginning in 1997.

 

3443


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table presents information regarding beneficial ownership of our common shares as of March 29, 2020,24, 2022, by:

 

each person or entity who is known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common shares;

 

each of our directors;current directors and director nominees;

 

each of the Named Executive Officers; and

 

all of our current directors and executive officers as a group.

Percentage computations are based on 279,001,118262,552,688 common shares outstanding as of March 29, 202024, 2022 and excludes 36,518,52011,966,950 treasury shares held by the Company.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. Each person named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to all of the securities shown as beneficially owned by such person, except as otherwise set forth above and in the notes to the table. Information with respect to each fund described in the table is based on information provided to us by such funds. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each person named in the table is c/o NXP Semiconductors N.V., High Tech Campus 60, 5656 AG, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

 

Name of Beneficial Owner

  Common
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
   % of
Common Shares
Beneficially
Owned
 

FMR LLC1

   24,660,005    8.84

T. Rowe2

   24,617,255    8.82

BlackRock, Inc.3

   16,560,729    5.94

Richard L. Clemmer4,5

   987,612    * 

Sir Peter Bonfield6

   27,300    * 

Kenneth A. Goldman6

   24,589    * 

Josef Kaeser6

   39,556    * 

Lena Olving6

   1,749    * 

Peter Smitham6

   5,641    * 

Julie Southern6

   12,581    * 

Jasmin Staiblin6

   1,749    * 

Gregory Summe6,7

   13,342    * 

Karl-Henrik Sundström6

   1,749    * 

Kurt Sievers4

   77,150    * 

Peter Kelly4,8

   314,861    * 

Stephen Owen4

   1,883    * 

David W. Reed4

   48,385    * 

Directors and executive officers as a group9

   1,574,968    * 

Name of Beneficial Owner

  Common
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
   % of
Common Shares
Beneficially
Owned
 

BlackRock, Inc.1

   23,360,361    8.90

FMR LLC2

   19,543,266    7.44

JPMorgan Chase & Co.3

   17,256,841    6.57

Kurt Sievers

   141,114    * 

Sir Peter Bonfield

   15,192    * 

Annette Clayton

       * 

Anthony Foxx

       * 

Kenneth A. Goldman4

   19,240    * 

Chunyuan Gu

         

Josef Kaeser

   10,028    * 

Lena Olving

   1,641    * 

Peter Smitham

   5,792    * 

Julie Southern

   9,039    * 

Jasmin Staiblin

   3,623    * 

Gregory Summe5

   13,494    * 

Karl-Henrik Sundström

   1,647    * 

William Betz6

   2,702    * 

Andrew Micallef

       * 

Stephen Owen

   30,264    * 

Jennifer Wuamett7

   45,008    * 

Peter Kelly8

   205,739    * 

Directors and current executive officers as a group (18 individuals)9

   298,784    * 

 

*

Represents less than 1%.

1. 

Information about the number of common shares owned by FMR LLCBlackRock, Inc. (“FMR”Blackrock”) on December 31, 2019,2021, is based solely on a Schedule 13G13G/A filed by Blackrock with the SEC on February 13, 2022. Blackrock’s address is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055. Blackrock beneficially owned an aggregate of 23,360,361 common shares, has sole power to vote 20,813,424 shares and the sole power to dispose of 23,360,361 shares of our common stock.

2.

Information about the number of common shares owned by FMR LLC (“FMR”) is based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed by FMR LLC with the SEC on February 2, 2020,9, 2022, reporting share ownership as of December 31, 2019.2021. The address of FMR is 245 Summer Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210.

44


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT (continued)

FMR, along with certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates, and other companies, beneficially owned an aggregate of 24,660,00519,543,266 common shares, has sole power to vote 2,929,7291,803,913 shares and the sole power to dispose of 24,660,00519,543,266 shares of our common stock. Abigail P. Johnson is a Director, the Chairman, and the Chief Executive Officer of FMR. Members of the Johnson family, including Abigail P. Johnson, are the predominant owners, directly or through trusts, of Series B voting common shares of FMR, representing 49% of the voting power of FMR. The Johnson family group and all other Series B shareholders have entered into a shareholders’ voting agreement under which all Series B voting common shares will be voted in accordance with the majority vote of Series B voting common shares. Accordingly, through their ownership of voting common shares and the execution of the shareholders’ voting agreement, members of the Johnson family may be deemed under the Investment Company Act of 1940, to form a controlling group with respect to FMR.

35


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT (continued)

2.

Information about the number of common shares owned by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (“T. Rowe”) on December 31, 2019, is based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed by T. Rowe with the SEC on February 14, 2020. T. Rowe’s address is 100 E. Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202. T. Rowe beneficially owned an aggregate of 24,617,255 common shares, has sole power to vote 9,092,895 shares and the sole power to dispose of 24,600,772 shares of our common stock.

3. 

Information about the number of common shares owned by BlackRock, Inc.JPMorgan Chase & Co. (“Blackrock”JPMorgan”) on December 31, 2019,2021, is based solely on a Schedule 13G filed by BlackrockJPMorgan with the SEC on February 10, 2020. Blackrock’sJanuary 26, 2022. JPMorgan’s address is 55 East 52nd Street,383 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10055. Blackrock10017. JPMorgan beneficially owned an aggregate of 16,560,72917,256,841 common shares, has sole power to vote 15,010,07915,834,435 shares and the sole power to dispose of 16,560,72916,988,614 shares of our common stock, as well as the shared power to vote 164,468 shares and the shared power to dispose of 263,569 shares of our common stock.

4. 

These amounts includeIncludes 12,448 shares held indirectly by the Goldman-Valeriote Family Trust and 3,000 shares held indirectly by MNM Holdings LLC.

5.

Includes 3,000 shares held indirectly by the G L Summe Irrevocable Trust.

6.

Includes 365 shares held indirectly by custodial account for child.

7.

Includes 8,394 shares that may be acquired upon exercise of stock options that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of March 29, 2020, as follows: 138,734 shares for Mr. Clemmer, 35,886 shares for Mr. Sievers, 206,346 shares for Mr. Kelly and 30,143 shares for Mr. Reed.

5.

Includes 5,000 and 100 shares held by his spouse and son respectively.

6.

Includes 1,749 RSUs that vest within 60 days of March 29, 2020.

7.

Includes 3,000 shares held by the G L Summe Irrevocable Trust.exercisable.

8. 

Includes 40,000 shares held by 2019 GRAT.

9.

Includes 419,503141,346 shares that may be acquired upon exercise of stock options that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 daysexercisable.

9.

Includes 8,394 shares that may be acquired upon exercise of March 29, 2020.stock options that are currently exercisable.

 

3645


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion & Analysis

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) describes our 20192021 executive compensation program for the following executive officers (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”):

 

Name  Title

Richard ClemmerKurt Sievers

  Executive Director and President and Chief Executive Officer

Kurt Sievers

President

Peter KellyWilliam Betz

  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (as of October 12, 2021)

Andrew Micallef

Executive Vice President Global Operations

Stephen Owen

  Executive Vice President Global Sales and Marketing

David ReedJennifer Wuamett

  Executive Vice President, TechnologyGeneral Counsel and OperationsChief Sustainability Officer

Peter Kelly

Former Chief Financial Officer

We encourage shareholders to understandNXP pays for the performance and contributions of our beliefs in rewarding our executives. Therefore, we are providingNEOs through an overviewintegrated compensation program with a variety of the philosophies, principles and practices that we employ, as governed by the Board of Directors of NXP (the “Board”).components. The NEOs, under the leadership of our Executive Director and President and Chief Executive Officer (our “CEO”) and the other members of the Board, are held accountable for delivering results, while simultaneously creating a culture of innovation and customer focus. This CD&A explains our strategy in incentivizing, compensating and rewarding our NEOs. We are providing an overview of the philosophies, principles, and practices that we employ, as governed by the Board of Directors of NXP (the “Board”). The compensation of our CEO is determined by the Board in accordance with the principles set forth in the remuneration policy for executive andnon-executive directors previously approved by our general meeting of shareholders, as required under Dutch corporate law.

2019 Performance was Strong Despite Market Headwinds2021 Was An Exceptional Year

“Semiconductors are entering a new cycle of growth driven by in-car electronics, AI-IoT devices, cloud processing, automation, 5G and connectivity features that make the world smarter and more sustainable. NXP’s strategy continues to focus on strong corporate governance and innovative system solutions that enable our customers’ success and drive long-term, profitable growth and shareholder value.”

Kurt Sievers, President and CEO

In 2019,2021, the globalworld, and especially the semiconductor market, experienced supply chain disruptions and, at the same time, an extraordinary demand resurgence. We also relied on the resilience and adaptability of our workforce to operate very effectively in which NXP competes experienced a significant decline duethe continued uncertainties of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

2021 Financial and Operational Context

Our focus is to invest in solutions that will drive long-term, profitable growth, superior free cash flow and robust capital returns to our shareholders. Our strategy is to attain high relative market share positions within our target end markets, enabling our customers to succeed. Our financial performance in 2021 was strong despite continued COVID-19 pandemic and supply chain challenges. Overcoming these challenges we:

Delivered Strong Year-on-Year Revenue Growth: Revenue was $11.06 billion, up 28.5% year-on-year

Continued to Drive Robust Profitability: GAAP gross profit was $6.07 billion, up 43.3% year-on-year, equating to a varietyGAAP gross margin of macroeconomic dynamics that54.8%, up 566 bps from 2020. Non-GAAP gross profit was $6.21 billion, up 41% year-on-year, equating to a non-GAAP gross margin* of 56.1%, up 500 bps from 2020. We continued to invest in our people and technology portfolio so as to deliver unique and differentiated products enabling our customers’ success. GAAP operating expenses were generally outside$3.48 billion, down 11.4 % year-on-year or 31.5 % of the controlrevenue. Non-GAAP operating expenses* were $2.56 billion, up 17.9% year-on-year or 23.2 % of revenue consistent with our management team (e.g.,stated long term US-Chinanon-GAAP trade disputes, global supplyfinancial model. Taken together GAAP operating profit was $2.58 billion, up 517.9% year-on-year, equating to a GAAP operating margin of 23.3%, up 1,849 bps from 2020, and demand dynamics, political uncertainty, delayed capital investment decisions byour non-GAAP operating profit* was $3.64 billion, up 63.4% year-on-year, equating to a numbernon-GAAP operating margin* of companies). This resulted32.9%, up 704 bps points from 2020.

Generated Strong Cash Flow: Full-year cash flow from operations was $3.08 billion, with net capex investments of $766 million, resulting in revenue reductions across the industry and for NXP. Despite these challenges, we achieved a numbernon-GAAP free cash flow of financial, strategic, and operational successes during 2019:$2.31 billion up 10.4% year-on-year or 21% of revenue*

46


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

 

Returned Consistent and Robust Capital to Shareholders: Consistent with our stated long-term goal to return excess free cash flow to our owners, in 2021 NXP returned $4.58 billion to shareholders through previously announced share repurchases (20.6 million shares for a total cost of $4.02 billion) and cash dividends ($562 million), reducing our diluted share count by approximately 2.9%.

LOGO

 

*

non-GAAP gross margin, andnon-GAAP operating expenses, non-GAAP operating profit, non-GAAP operating margin and non-GAAP free cash flow are financial measures that do not comply with US GAAP. Appendix A to this Proxy Statement quantifies and reconciles these measures to the comparable US GAAP financial measures.measure.

FollowingAccelerating Profitable Growth

In 2021, our extraordinary accomplishments supported our overall strategy and product portfolio, including the termination offollowing:

LOGOAUTOMOTIVE

Delivered NXP’s S32G2 vehicle network processors and the Qualcomm acquisition in July 2018, 2019 marked the first full fiscal year of theS32R294 radar processor on TSMC’s advanced 16 nanometer (nm) FinFET process technology

Combined NXP’s vehicle networking, gateway and i.MX 8 Series processors to enable enhanced services, convenience and re-establishedover-the-air NXP. We continued to implement our strategic business plan that sets us on a solid pathupdateable vehicles

Continued innovation for growthclean, sustainable and power-efficient electronic vehicles with NXP’s complete and highly scalable BMS and Inverter Solutions, bringing down costs, proving safety and increasing shareholder value, while also maintainingperformance with extended range and fast charging

NXP’s BMS solution powered a large eBus fleet in China, electric bikes launch in India and energy storage projects in the flexibility to adjustUnited States

LOGOINDUSTRIAL AND IOT

Expanded our EdgeVerse portfolio with crossover applications processors as well as next-generation i.MX 9 series of high-performance intelligent applications processors

Continued innovation across our Wi-Fi 6 / BLE SoC portfolio with new highly integrated Wi-Fi 6 solutions across embedded processing portfolio

LOGOMOBILE

Combined NXP’s Ultra-Wideband (UWB) and Bluetooth® technologies to provide greater location accuracy for Samsung Galaxy SmartTag+

LOGOCOMMUNICATION INFRASTRUCTURE

Announced RF solutions for 5G massive MIMO that combine the ever-changing global market environment. The business plan also ensures we meet our customers’, employees’ and other stakeholders’, including suppliers’ and local communities’, needs while maximizing shareholders’ returns.high efficiency of GaN with the compactness of multi-chip modules

 

3747


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

 

Furthermore, weOur People: The Heart of NXP

We maintained our significant investment in R&D, especially focused on preserving critical R&D talent to continue delivering projects and setup future growth

We successfully transitioned two retiring, named executive officers, with one coming through an external hire and one through our internal succession planning process

We maintained strong leadership of our workforce, whether working in our essential operations or remotely, to support and minimize the disruption of our talent

We continued to maintaintake targeted actions to ensure talent continuity, recognizing that a high standardloss of our key management and other team members, or an inability to attract qualified new employees, could affect our business in a highly competitive environment

Safety and wellbeing of our team members, customers and suppliers

We executed world-class health and safety protocols at all NXP sites to mitigated the safety risks to our team members who were onsite running our fabrication plants and R&D laboratories during this time

We continued our commitment to open communications with respect to incentive plan goal setting, even inteam members

We launched a Team Member Wellbeing series that focused specifically on areas of physical, emotional and personal wellbeing for our team members across the faceworld

Shareholder Engagement and Results of 2021 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

At our annual general meeting of shareholders held on May 26, 2021, we received approximately 65% of the market headwindsvotes in favor of the proposal to approve our NEOs’ compensation, on a non-binding, advisory basis. While this represented an improvement from our 2020 results, we experienced during 2019. are continuing our efforts to increase the overall shareholder support for our compensation program. We recognize the importance of engaging with our shareholders to ensure that we understand their concerns about our compensation program philosophy and design.

Our strong commitmentinvestor outreach efforts were aimed at supporting two major goals. First, we maintained a consistent, proactive and timely engagement with current and potential shareholders to present our long-term strategy, the tangible proof points and measurement of our execution and our resulting financial performance. These engagements are undertaken throughout the year by a combination of our CEO, CFO and other executives. During 2021, notwithstanding the ongoing remote working situation that applied to both NXP and its shareholders, our management team held over 250 unique virtual investor meetings. Additionally, we held our triennial Investor Day in November 2021, where members of our management presented a compelling roadmap for profitable growth to 55 analysts and investors attending in-person, as well as over 300 unique investors attending virtually. Second, we facilitated on-going dialog between the governance and stewardship groups of our major shareholders and key members of our board of directors. These discussions focused on company management oversight, corporate governance, human capital management and environmental, social and governance (ESG) topics.

As a result, following our 2021 AGM, our Chair of the Board, the Vice-Chair of the Board and the Chairs of the Compensation and Nominating and Governance committees met with governance and investment stewardship teams of ten of our major shareholders, representing approximately 40% of outstanding shares, providing an opportunity for these shareholders to speak directly to our payboard leadership. In these discussions, our Board members sought ideas and feedback on environmental, social and governance-related matters as well as NXP’s executive compensation program.

What We Heard

The shareholders expressed appreciation for performance philosophythe opportunity to dialogue directly with board members on governance and sustainability issues. A majority of investors expressed support for NXP to issue carbon neutral goals. The consistent feedback was reflectedthat we should establish a long-term goal combined with specific intermediate targets annually. Several shareholders specifically noted that they preferred these goals to be set/verified under the Science Based Targets initiative.

48


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

A majority of investors supported or suggested that we include ESG metrics in our compensation plans and noted they favor giving companies flexibility in choosing appropriate metrics and whether to include ESG metrics as components of short or long term compensation. The investors also asked that we provide transparent disclosure on why we select certain metrics and how they relate to our business so they could evaluate for appropriateness to our business.

We also discussed the performance goals we established for 2019,design and ultimately in the results and amounts that were earned or vested underpayout ranges of our annual and long-termperformance-based long term incentive programs for our NEOs.

Perspectives on Shareholder Performance

On October 27, 2016, Qualcomm and NXP announced an agreement inequity program, which Qualcomm would acquire NXP for $110 per share; on February 20, 2018, the agreed price was increased to $127.50 per share. After failing to receive the necessary regulatory approvals in China, Qualcomm ultimately dropped its acquisition bid on July 26, 2018.

Company performance and its link to pay for performance is often measured via a company’suses three-year relative total shareholder return (“TSR”). However,as the performance measure. Target shares are earned if our share price return is at the median of our compensation peer group. Initial or threshold payouts begin by achieving at least the second quartile performance. A minority of the shareholders provided feedback that we should consider adding another metric to this program, expressing a three-year analysis is notpreference for compensation programs with multiple metrics.

The shareholders with whom we connected generally provided positive feedback on our overall ongoing executive compensation program design and found that we have an appropriate reflectionbalance of managementshort and long-term rewards, with sufficient performance related elements.

In addition to specific comments on executive compensation, shareholders noted that we made significant progress in 2021 to advance our disclosures regarding human capital as well as diversity, equality and inclusion and expressed a continued interest in understanding important information about our workforce including:

Demographics

Diversity, equality and inclusion goals and statistics

How we invest in our current and future talent

How we monitor and manage retention

We have included an explanation of these topics in the case‘Human Capital Management’ section of this proxy statement beginning on page 9. More details about these topics are included in our 2021 NXP as management had very little influenceCorporate Sustainability Report which can be found on NXP’s stock price performanceour website at http://nxp.com/CSR. The contents of our website and our Corporate Sustainability Report are referenced for general information only and are not incorporated by reference in this proxy statement.

How We Responded

Our Board and the first halfHuman Resources and Compensation Committee of the three-year period ending December 31, 2019, givenBoard (the “HRCC” or the Qualcomm transaction period.“Committee”) thoughtfully considered and evaluated important information gathered from our shareholder engagement process and, together with feedback and input from our independent executive compensation consultant, decided upon a course of action considering all relevant stakeholders. Based on this process we made three modifications to our executive compensation programs and disclosure practices as described below.

Following the acquisition announcement2021 Modifications to Our Executive Compensation Programs and consistent with most transactions, NXP’s stock price immediately increased to at or near the acquisition priceDisclosure Practices

1.

Starting in 2022 we have introduced a sustainability component including environment and people related metrics into our short term annual incentive plan to reinforce our corporate commitment in these areas. As a large, multinational company, we know that our operations are strengthened when we leverage the diversity of thought and cultures of our workforce. We are also committed to reducing the environmental impact of our operations, being good stewards of our planet and doing our part to create a more sustainable world. We are dedicated to measurable year-on-year progress. Therefore, the HRCC approved the introduction of a sustainability component which contains multiple metrics and targets in service of supporting our long term environmental and people related aspirations. The HRCC set the weighting of the sustainability component at 20% of our Annual Incentive Plan. We will discuss this sustainability component further later in this CD&A.

2.

We reduced the share realization of our 2021 PSU awards from 50% to 25% of target at the 25th percentile relative total shareholder return, which is the minimum payout threshold for this program. This further reinforces our pay for performance philosophy by reducing the threshold payment amount if we underperform our peers. While we also considered adding other performance metrics to our performance-based equity program, the HRCC determined to continue using Relative Total Shareholder Return (“RTSR”) as the single metric in order to keep the program simple to communicate and to align most effectively with the long-term shareholder interests.

3.

We enhanced the disclosure in this proxy statement to more transparently describe the basis for decisions we make around our compensation programs and expanded the disclosures around our human capital programs.

49


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

Other compensation program elements that are discussed later remained unchanged and had received positive support from our shareholders. This includes our continued standard practice of determining equity award sizes for all NEOs based on prevailing market practice in the fall of 2016 and traded within a narrow range, and tighter than our compensation peer group average overand determining appropriate annual incentive plan measures based upon the same period, until the deal was terminated inmid-2018. During this time, NXP’s management had very little potential influencecompany’s business focused targets.

Ongoing Shareholder Engagement

We will continue a regular, proactive shareholder engagement approach with portfolio managers, sector equity analysts and governance teams. We believe that regular engagement with our shareholders is important and will allow us to continue to understand and respond to their questions and concerns on the stock price, regardless of management’s actions and the organization’s success. Once the transaction was terminated and after a period of volatility driven by the change in our shareholder base, NXP’s stock price began to trade again based on management’s decisions, company performance and the general market conditions.

Thus, instead of comparing results since the beginning of 2017, a more appropriate comparison isreal-time basis. Throughout this process, we will seek to review NXP’s results relative to its peers since the acquisition was officially terminated. Any assessment of pay for performance alignment should also be conducted in this manner. NXP’s stock price performance was strong in 2019, bothgain feedback and answer shareholder questions on an absolute basisour business strategy, compensation practices, governance topics, ESG and relative to our peers, with our stock price ranging from $71.56 on January 2, 2019 to a high of $129.50 on December 20, 2019. While stock price performance is unpredictable, we believe that strong, stable leadership and aligned shareholder and Company interests are contributing factors. The following table shows NXP’s stock price performance following the termination of the acquisition in July 2018 to the end of 2019.

LOGO

NXP initiated a sharebuy-back program which has reduced the diluted share count by 19% with direct impact to the shareholders. In 2018, we also initiated a dividend program which was increased in 2019. This program has delivered over $6 Billion in value directly to shareholders.other related issues.

Compensation Philosophy

As previously described in the Governance‘Corporate Governance’ section of this Proxy,proxy statement, our long-term strategy is to maximize value for our shareholders and other stakeholders and generate strong cash flows.of the Company. By driving relative market share, exceeding customer expectationsrevenue growth, strong gross margin and enhancing the product portfolio as well as developing, rewarding and retaining a highly engaging our employeesengaged workforce, we expect to be able to grow 50% faster than the market in general.have shown a strong return for shareholders. Our purpose is bringing together bright minds to create breakthrough technologies that make the connected world better, safer, and goal is to provide Secure Connections for a Smarter World,more secure, a mission inspired by our customer-focused passion to win.innovation and customer focus. We have directly and deliberately linked NEO pay to stakeholder interests and to the innovations we deliver through our products.

38


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

including shareholders. This will be discussed in detail in following sections of this CD&A.

We operate globally and our executives are located in multiple countries. As a result, our pay philosophy considers both the overall importance of consistency across the geographiesworld and specific competitive pay practices in which we operate andthe local country where our executive talent resides, as well as the need to ensureresides. Our overarching pay strategy is to:

Pay for Performance—delivering highly competitive practices within a local country. overall pay for market leading performance.

Our executive compensation program is designed to:

 

Enable the organization toattract, retain, motivate and grow highly qualified talent with competitive and comprehensive programs

Align to stakeholder interests, including shareholders, customers, employees, suppliers, as well as local and international communities where we operate,, by delivering short and long term corporate strategic goals

Enable NXP to attract, retain, motivate, and grow highly qualified talent with competitive and comprehensive programs

 

Create, develop, and reward oursmart, dedicated, hard-working and innovative executive and management team members

 

Reward bothcollective and individual performance with highly competitive rewards for outstanding performance consistent with our top pay for superior performance

 

DeliverEnsure fiscally sound practices while maximizing the value of the various compensation programs to individuals and NXP

 

Align to and rewarddemonstration of corporate values in support of our strong corporate culture

Focus our innovations and rewards on our commitment to environmental and social good

Key Practices in Determining Executive Compensation

The compensation of our CEO Mr. Richard Clemmer, is determined by the Board, in accordance with the principles set forth in the remuneration policy for executive andnon-executive Directorsdirectors previously approved by our general meeting of shareholders, as required under Dutch corporate law.

50


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

The compensation of our other NEOs is also governed by the Board with a number of specific actions taken to ensure the direct connection of rewards to key performance outcomes aligning executive pay to short and long-term stakeholder interests. Overall, our programs are competitive in the marketplace and highly incentive-based, with a majoritylarge percentage of overall compensationat-risk‘at-risk’ which can be earned via our shortshort- and long termlong-term incentive programs based on overall Company and individual performance.

 

What We Do      What We DoNOT Do
    

   Emphasizepay for performance

 

   Tie a significant majority of our executives’ pay to Company performance and use multipleboth long- and short-term performance metrics both long and short term

 

   Cap annual incentive and performance share unit plan payouts at 200% of target

   Maintain meaningful stock ownership guidelines for executives and Directors

   Use an independent Compensation Consultant to guide the Compensation plans

 

   Include a “double-trigger” provision under our cash and equity incentive plans in the event of achange-in-control

   Maintain meaningful stock ownership guidelines for executives and directors

   Use an independent executive compensation consultant to guide the compensation plans

   Evaluate competitive market practices to establish program design and targeted payout amounts

 

   Conduct an annual risk assessment of our compensation programs

 

   Maintain a robust clawbackclaw back policy covering cash and equity incentive plan awards for executivesdirectors, including the executive director and DirectorsCEO

 

   Follow principles of our shareholder approved executive andnon-executive director remuneration policy

   Conduct board-level outreach to shareholders to elicit feedback on our compensation program

   PSUs potentially earned is capped at 100% of target if total shareholder return for the performance period is negative, regardless of the Company’s relative performance compared to the Peer Group

    

×  Re-price options

×  Provide for guaranteed salary increases or payouts for performance-based awards

 

×  Provide dividends or dividend equivalents on unearned performance share units

×  Provide for excise taxgross-ups resulting from M&A activity or terminations

×  Provide for excessive separation payments, liberal definitions of change in control, or single-trigger cash severance upon a change in control

 

×  Provide above market returns on deferred compensation plans

 

×  Permit short sales, hedging, and transactions involving derivatives of our stock

 

×  Provide personal loans, guarantees or other similar arrangements to executives

×Allow the pledging of Company stock by directors, executive officers, and certain other employees

×  Re-price or buyout options without shareholder approval

 

3951


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

 

Proactive Shareholder Engagement

We recognize the importance of regular engagement, communication, and transparency with our shareholders. As a result, we maintain an ongoing process to proactively engage with existing and potential shareholders to provide insights into the operating performance of the Company. Throughout this process, we seek to gain feedback on our business strategy, compensation practices, governance topics, and other related issues. During 2019, management held discussions with a cross-section of our shareholders owning 60 – 70% of our shares at the time. Consistent with past practice, management and members of the Board continued ongoing engagement with shareholders and the investment community. In connection with these discussions, our shareholders approved the 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan which provides for parameters of cash and equity-based incentive awards for employees including our NEOs.

Our Board and executives thoughtfully considered and evaluated important information and decided upon the most appropriate next steps considering all relevant stakeholders. We believe our current executive compensation programs reflect current market practices and align with our shareholder concerns. Especially important is the connection between our operational and financial goals and results to the pay of our executives along with the benefit of our shareholders. We look forward to continuing the engagement process in future years.

Key Components of Our Executive Compensation Program

 

Pay Component

 

 

What It DoesApproach and Structure

 

 

How it Reinforces
Connection to

Our Compensation Philosophy and

2021 Key Points

 

 

Base Salary

(see page 54)

 

 

Provides a competitive fixed component of cash compensation based

  Based on an individual’s role, experience, capability, and contributions aligned with

  Reviewed annually against competitive benchmarks in local regional and global talent markets

 

 

 

Attracts, retains, motivates, and enables us to develop highly qualified executive leaders

Key Point: Limited salary increases for NEOs including Mr. Betz upon promotion to CFO and Ms. Wuamett, our EVP General Counsel, to better align with market levels

 

Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”)

(see page 55)

 

 

  Variable, at-risk compensation

Rewards achievement of business/function, and/or overall corporate results against key Company near-term goals

  Performance measures and targets evaluated semi-annually and set by the Board

  In 2021, the program focused on absolute revenue growth and non-GAAP gross margin

 

 

Rewards Company performance against challenging short-term targets, with highly competitiveappropriate and capped rewards for outstanding performance

Key Point: 2021 2H performance targets were raised to reflect the market discussed further on page 56

Key Point: The revenue performance metric was changed to an absolute revenue target

Key Point: 2022 performance measures will include a sustainability component focusing on environmental and people initiatives

 

 

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units (“PSU”)

(see page 59)

 

 

Meaningfully incents management to execute on our longer-term business objectives driving

  Drives long-term shareholder value creation

  Vesting based on 3-year cliff using 3-year RTSR measured against a defined compensation peer group

 

Aligns with shareholder interests by driving superior performance against longer-term corporate financial, operational, and strategic goals

Key Point: Target awards represent 70% of long-term incentive compensation value at time of award

Key Point: Payout is capped at 200% for top quartile performance and capped at 100% if RTSR is negative regardless of relative ranking

Key Point: The percent of target PSUs awarded at second quartile performance was reduced from 50% to 25%

 

Restricted Stock Units (“RSU”)

(see page 59)

 

 

Aligns executives’ interests with those of shareholders

  Helps the Company retain key talent

  Vests ratably over time3 years

 

 

Aligns with shareholder interests, while also establishing strong retention of our highly qualified executive talent over time

Key Point: Target awards represent 30% of long-term incentive compensation at time of award

 

 

Benefits and Other Compensation

(see page 61)

 

 

Generally, delivers local programs, consistent with other employees,executives, to plan for various life events of our executives; supports

  Supports the varying needs of executives operating in a complex, global environment; allowsenvironment

  Allows executives to maximize time and attention on activities driving company performance

 

Attracts, retains, motivates, and enables us to develop highly qualified executive leaders while providing a competitive overall total rewards program

Key Point: Benefits and other compensation are generally consistent with those offered to other executives within the same country of residence as the NEO. We do not offer excessive perquisites to our NEOs

 

4052


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

 

A Large Majority of Our NEOs’ Target Pay isAt-Risk

Our performance-based culture andpay-for-performance pay for performance philosophy strongly align the interests of our executivesNEOs with those of our stakeholders. As shown in the following charts, our 20192021 target executive compensation program was focused extensively on variable, performance-based andheavily weighted towards at-risk compensation. Our CEO has 93% of his target compensation at risk with variable components. More than 65% is directly linked to performance of the company and himself through the value of his target AIP and performance-based equity awards. Our other executive officers who are NEOs, excluding our former CFO, also have 84% of their target compensation at risk and 63% of their compensation linked directly to performance.

 

LOGOLOGO

LOGO

These figures include annualized salary, target AIP and annual equity award grant values. Figures exclude the items outlined in the Summary Compensation Table as All Other Compensation. The average NEO figures exclude the CEO and former CFO.

Peer Group Analysis and Benchmarking

Competitive data associated with our Peer Group is evaluated annually by the HRCC to:

Use as the basis for setting target total compensation

Drive appropriate pay levels to attract, retain, motivate, and develop our executive team

Ensure that we provide market competitive programs—both individually and in aggregate

Calibrate relative shareholder return for purposes of determining the vesting of performance-based stock unit plans (see further discussion later in this proxy)

In addition to our Peer Group, the HRCC, along with Mercer, the HRCC’s independent executive compensation consultant, and management, reviews compensation information from published surveys to assess select roles and provide a broader view of the local and global competitive marketplace. From time to time, we evaluate information on pay levels and plan designs from other comparable companies that we believe are important for a more comprehensive understanding of our industry and/or broader technology market practices.

This market research is used to inform program design principles along with the amount for each pay program and the overall total package. The HRCC uses competitive benchmark data focusing on the median of the Peer Group to inform various compensation related decisions including base salary, incentive targets and target equity award levels. While this benchmark information is used as a guideline, it is not used as a specific target. Other factors are also considered in making final decisions for each pay component such as experience, performance, role complexity, leadership capability, impact.

The HRCC reviews the Peer Group regularly to ensure the most appropriate information is used in making executive compensation decisions. For 2019,2021, the Compensation Committee—HRCC—in conjunction with Mercer the Compensation Committee’s independent advisor, and management—reviewed and updated NXP’s peer group (the “Peer Group”) for use in understanding market competitive pay levels for various executive positions, as well as other competitive compensation practices and plan designs.design components. To determine the companies to include in the Peer Group, a variety of factors were considered by the Compensation Committee,HRCC, including revenue, market capitalization, enterprise value, similarities to the industries in which we operate, and the overlapping labor market for top management talent. As a result of this review, the Compensation Committee added three companiesHRCC made no changes to the group for 2019: Marvell Technology Group, Maxim Integrated Products, and Microchip Technology. The Compensation Committee reviews the Peer Group regularly to ensure the most appropriate information is used in making executive compensation decisions.for 2021.

53


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

For 2019,2021, our Peer Group consisted of the following companies:

 

PEER GROUP

 

Advanced Micro Devices

 

  

Microchip Technology

 

 

Analog Devices

 

  

 

Micron Technology

 

 

Applied Materials

 

  

 

NVIDIA

 

 

ASML Holding

 

  

 

ON Semiconductor

 

 

Broadcom

 

  

 

QUALCOMM

 

 

Corning

 

  

 

STMicroelectronics

 

 

Infineon Technologies

 

  

 

Seagate Technology

 

 

Lam Research

 

  

 

TE Connectivity

 

 

Marvell Technology

 

  

 

Texas Instruments

 

 

Maxim Integrated ProductsProducts*

 

  

 

Western Digital

 

 

*

The Peer Group was determined by the HRCC prior to the completion of the acquisition of Maxim Integrated Products by Analog Devices.

41

2021 Compensation Decisions


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

Competitive data associated with this Peer Group is evaluated annually by the Compensation Committee to:

Use as the basis for setting target total compensation, after promotions or at time of hire

Drive appropriate pay levels to attract, retain, motivate and develop our executive team

Ensure thatBelow we provide market competitive programs—both individuallymore details about each pay component and in aggregate

Calibrate relative shareholder return for purposes of determininghow the vesting of performance-based stock unit plans (see further discussion later in this proxy)

In addition to our Peer Group, the Compensation Committee, along with Mercer and management, reviews compensation information from published surveys in order to assess select roles and provide a broader view of the local and global competitive marketplace. From time to time, we will evaluate information on pay levels and plan designs from other comparable companies that we believe are important for a more comprehensive understanding of our industry and/or broader market practices. We believe this broader look is relevant in certain instances in order to capture competitors for customers, capital, and talent.

2019 Compensation Decisionsrelated amounts were determined.

Base Salary

Base salary represents annual fixed compensation and is a standard element of our executive compensation program we believe is necessary to attract and retain talent. The Compensation CommitteeHRCC reviews base salaries annually and approves each NEO’s base salary after assessing the following:

 

AnThe individual’s role, performance and contributions, experience, and internal equity considerations relative to other executives with similar level roles and responsibilities;responsibilities

 

The competitive landscape, including the compensation practices of the companies in our Peer Group (andand, where appropriate, survey data from a broader index of comparable public companies); andcompanies

 

Our business strategy and compensation philosophy.philosophy

Past actions related to base salary and whether any further change is warranted

After thoughtful consideration of all of these factors, the Compensation Committee decided not to provideHRCC determined the following annualized base salary increases to any of our NEOs in 2019. As a result, the 2019 annual base salarysalaries for each of ourthe NEOs, was as follows:only two of which increased on an annualized basis from 2020.

 

Name  2019 AnnualAnnualized Base Salary ($)as of
December 31, 2021
Kurt Sievers

$1,181,800

Richard Clemmer(1,000,000)

William Betz

$450,000

Andrew Micallef

$500,000

Stephen Owen

  

$531,810

$1,345,200

(450,000)

Kurt Sievers

Jennifer Wuamett

  

$745,465

515,000

Peter Kelly

  

$750,000

Stephen Owen

$504,450

David Reed

$525,000

Note: The average exchange rate of 1.1211.1818 (internal annual average rate) was used to convert from Euros to USD for Messrs. Clemmer, Sievers and Owen who are eachboth paid in Euros.

54


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

Effective from April 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020, as a response to the COVID 19 pandemic, Messrs. Sievers, Owen and Kelly and Ms. Wuamett agreed to a voluntary 25% reduction in base pay. In 2021, for Messrs. Sievers, Owen and Kelly, the base salary was unchanged from 2020 other than to reflect the termination of the voluntary reduction. During the HRCC’s annual review process in May 2021, Ms. Wuamett’s salary was increased from $470,000 to $515,000 effective July 1, 2021 based on the competitive marketplace and her experience.

In the case of new placements, whether newly hired or internally promoted, the HRCC engages in a specific analysis and discussion to establish the initial pay level. Mr. Micallef was newly hired to replace the retiring Executive Vice President Global Operations in May of 2021. His annualized base salary was determined to be $500,000 upon hire. Mr. Betz was internally promoted on October 12, 2021 to replace Mr. Kelly as Chief Financial Officer resulting from our succession planning process. Given that he is a new CFO and will be developing into his role, the Committee determined an appropriate annualized base salary to be $450,000. This base salary level will be reviewed along with the other NEOs annually and will be adjusted as appropriate to reflect growth in the role and the competitive market.

Between October 12, 2021 until his retirement on February 28, 2022, Mr. Kelly remained an employee of the Company’s subsidiary under the terms and conditions of Mr. Kelly’s already existing employment agreement which sets his base pay at $750,000 and his annual incentive plan target at 100%. During this time, he provided transitional support to Mr. Betz in order to ensure the smooth transition of this crucial role. Other than agreements established while Mr. Kelly was CFO, no additional arrangements were entered with Mr. Kelly with regards to his retirement from the Company.

Annual Incentive Program

The Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) is the primary short-term incentive vehicle that we use to drive performance on an annuala short term basis. The AIP focuses on annual performance metrics critical to NXP’s success.success that are measured on a six monthly basis. These metrics and goals and their associated performance ranges are established near the start of the fiscal yeareach six month performance period and approved by the Compensation Committee.HRCC. The AIP is a plan under the Company’s 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan.Plan as approved by shareholders in 2019.

The HRCC reviews and approves the AIP program and targets taking into consideration:

 

42


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

The Compensation Committee also approves AIP targets at the start of the year for each NEO after holistically considering the individual’sEach NEO’s role, experience and expected contributions

The competitive market for determining targets as a percentage of base salary

The measures that best reflect the company’s short-term strategy and performance expectations in the fiscal year and their alignment to the Company, market data, and internal equity with other executives with similar level roles and responsibilities. stakeholder interests

The 20192021 AIP targets approved for the NEOs were as followsMessrs. Sievers, Owen, Kelly and remainMs. Wuamett remained unchanged from 2018:2020. The AIP target for Mr. Betz reflects his promotion as CFO and for Mr. Micallef, his appointment as Executive Vice President Global Operations.

 

Name  

AIP Target

(% of Base Salary)

Kurt Sievers150%

Richard Clemmer

William Betz

  

150%

80%

Kurt Sievers

Andrew Micallef

  

100%

80%

Peter Kelly

Stephen Owen

  

100%

80%

Stephen Owen

Jennifer Wuamett

  

80%

David Reed

Peter Kelly

  

80%

100%

For 2019,2021, our AIP had two financial components with theweighted equally at 50% each. The overall payout opportunity is capped at 200% of target:target. The two financial measures were:

 

Revenue Growth & Market Share Gain:Growth: NXP is a market leader in multiple markets. Continuingend markets, and our continued success is dependent on our ability to grow our revenues and market leading positionrevenue in these markets,markets. Management and the HRCC reviewed the approach used in 2020 which focused on relative revenue growth and evaluated our growth as well as expand revenues anda percentage of the overall market. This approach used external market share statistics in our other targeted markets, is vital to our continued success

 

55


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

comparing NXP revenue to our strategic end markets via the focused Total Available Market as defined by World Semiconductor Trade Statistics. The HRCC determined that this market data reflected an overall growth in the semiconductor market that was concentrated largely outside of NXP’s end markets. Therefore in 2021, we implemented a straightforward metric related to absolute revenue targets to deliver shareholder value rather than a relative market share revenue growth which was used only in 2020.Specifically, the revenue metric is the fully reported GAAP result as publicly reported for the two quarters comprising the performance period.

Non-GAAP Gross Margin* ExpansionMargin Expansion::Non-GAAP Gross Margingross margin forms the cornerstone to driving our overall profitability. Successfully delivering differentiated new products that drive value to our customers is critical to deliveringdriving profitable growth. This is consistent with the measure used in 2019 and 2020 representing continued focus on gross margin. Non-GAAP Gross Margin is a non-GAAP financial measure. We calculate Non-GAAP gross margin by adjusting Gross Margin to exclude the effects of purchase price accounting, restructuring, stock-based compensation, merger-related costs, and other incidentals. These measures should not be considered as a substitute for, or superior to, the measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.

*

Non-GAAP Gross margin is a financial measure that does not comply with US GAAP. Appendix A to this Proxy Statement quantifies and reconciles it to the comparable 2019 US GAAP financial measures.

The following table showssemiconductor industry, especially in the metrics, weightings,markets NXP serves, historically has experienced cyclical performance. Starting in 2020, NXP developed performance targets for each half of the year to be measured and judged independently for purposes of the Annual Incentive Plan. In 2020, the performance levelstargets for both of the Corporate Financial Performance Component and resulting Pay Factorhalf year performance periods of our 2019 AIP:

     CORPORATE FINANCIAL
PERFORMANCE(3)
  

PAYOUT

(% OF TARGET)

 

 

Metric

 

 

 

  Weighting  

 

  

 

  Threshold  

 

  

 

  Target  

 

  

 

  Maximum  

 

  

 

  Threshold  

 

  

 

  Target  

 

  

 

  Maximum  

 

 

 

Market Share(1)

 

     

 

 

 

 

Gating factor: market share must be maintained for revenue to payout

 

 

 

 

Revenue Growth

 

  

 

50

 

 

  

 

0

 

 

  

 

5

 

 

  

 

10

 

 

  

 

20

 

 

  

 

100

 

 

  

 

200

 

 

Non-GAAP Gross Margin(2)

 

  

 

50

 

 

  

 

54

 

 

  

 

55

 

 

  

 

56

 

 

  

 

20

 

 

  

 

100

 

 

  

 

200

 

 

(1)

If market share is not maintained, the payout for the revenue metric will be zero. Market share is based on the “World Semiconductors Trade Statistics” (WSTS) an industry association in which NXP participates. WSTS collects the revenue (billings) of several major semiconductor companies and calculates the size of the total available market (TAM) based on this input. We have set a target for market share growth and measure our performance against this commonly recognized source of reliable market share data. We calculate our market share by dividing our revenue by the total available market size adjusted for sectors NXP is not active in (TAM focus) and incidental adjustments for material deviations as determined by CMA.

(2)

If NXP’snon-GAAP gross margin is below 53%, it would result in zero funding for the plan regardless of revenue growth performance

(3)

For performance between those levels shown in the table, the percentage of target awards that would be earned is determined using linear interpolation.

the AIP were set by the Board in February 2020. 2020 was significantly impacted by the COVID 19 pandemic. In the first half 2020, we saw dramatic market downturns substantially the result of the pandemic. In keeping with our strong pay for performance philosophy, the measures that were set forth at the beginning of the year were not adjusted for market conditions or the impact of COVID-19. Despite overcoming challenges and building a recovery trajectory in the second half of 2020, we did not payout short term incentives to our NEOs as the threshold performance established prior to the pandemic were not changed. We believe our NEOs are ultimately responsible for delivering results despite economic and environmental conditions. These

In 2021, taking the cyclical nature of the industry along with the continued uncertainties of COVID 19 and supply chain challenges, NXP set performance targets for the performance periods at the start of the performance period (January 1 – June 30, 2021 (“1H 2021 Performance Period”) and July 1 – December 31, 2021 (“2H 2021 Performance Period”), rather than on an annual basis at the start of the year. The HRCC, in addition to setting the specific first half year targets, set directional goals for both performance periods at the beginning of the year. They then established the specific performance targets for the second half of the year after the first performance period ended. The performance targets set for each half were aggressivelyintended to improve on the performance of the previous year’s half yearly performance. The revenue targets for 1H 2021 and 2H 2021 were approximately 24% and 9% improvements over previous year halves’ actual performance respectively. The adjusted gross margin targets for 1H 2021 and 2H 2021 were approximately 7% and 7.5% improvements over previous year halves’ actual performance, respectively, in a challenging supply chain environment. In addition, 1H 2021 revenue targets were set to ensure that we maintained the performance of 2H 2020 even though a typical revenue pattern suggests 1H to be lower than 2H of the previous year. Setting targets for each half year at stretchthe beginning of the performance expectations.periods is reflective of the nature of business performance and allows us to better align rewards to realistic performance expectations considering the dynamics of the market. This approach allows the HRCC to consider many factors including significant uncontrollable impacts like COVID as well as potential market recoveries like were seen in the latter part of 2021.

For 2H 2021, the HRCC increased the 2H 2021 financial goals upon reviewing the exceptional recovery of the semiconductor market. The semiannual performance periods enabled us to gauge performance and respond to volatility in the market without having to make disruptive mid-cycle modifications. It also allowed for greater transparency on the progress towards the goals communicated to our employees. For employees other than our NEOs and other members of the management team, payouts were made twice – in October for the 1H 2021 Performance Period and April 2022 for the 2H Performance Period. For our NEOs and management team, the payout continued to be made on an annual basis in April 2022 using the formula below.

The AIP payments for our NEOs were calculated as follows (unless otherwise noted below):

 

43LOGO

*

Bonusable salary was determined based on year end base salary prorated for the time worked or for the amount already paid prior to promotion during the year.

56


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

 

Based on our 2019The following table shows the measures and payout factors at each performance level for the Corporate Financial Performance Component of our 2021 AIP was not earnedapproved by the Board at threshold:the beginning of each performance period:

 

Metric  Weighting   Actual Performance  

Payout

    (% of Target)    

Revenue Growth(1)

   50%   Revenue performance was -6% not meeting threshold performance  0%

Non-GAAP Gross Margin(2)

   50%   53.5% which did not meet threshold performance  0%

Payout Earned

  0%
2021 AIP Framework, Performance Targets & Results
   Measures 2020
Results
 Threshold
(25%)
 Target
(100%)
 Stretch
(200%)
 Weighting 2021
Result
 Measure
Realization
         
1H 2021 Revenue ($ millions) $3,838 $4,025 $4,775 $5,525 50% $5,163 151.8%
 Non-GAAP Gross Margin Expansion 50.5% 53.0% 54.0% 55.0% 50% 55.2% 200.0%
 1H Performance Period Payout Factor   175.9%
         

2H

2021

 Revenue ($ millions) $4,774 $4,500 $5,200 $5,900 50% $5,900 200.0%
 Non-GAAP Gross Margin Expansion 51.6% 54.5% 55.5% 56.5% 50% 56.9% 200.0%
 2H Performance Period Payout Factor             200.0%
   
  

Average Performance Factor

 187.95%

NXP’s performance in 2021 was a significant and remarkable rebound from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic downturn which impacted our strategic end markets and our performance in 2020, where the company made no payments under our AIP. During 2021, both revenue and non-GAAP gross margin performance were the best delivered in NXP history. Revenue was up 28.5% year over year, with sequential and annual growth in each of the four quarters of 2021. Non-GAAP gross margin expansion was exceptional, increasing 500 basis points year-on-year versus 2020. We believe the structure of AIP helped motivate our NEOs, management team and employees to build this momentum.

While the AIP for 2021 was split into two distinct six month performance periods, our NEOs only received one annual incentive payment in April 2022, i.e. after certification of the second half performance period. This was determined most appropriate in holding NEOs accountable for the full year and provided the HRCC with the ability to apply discretion to payouts, likely downward, in the event of a disconnect between performance in the two distinct performance periods. It also provided for an additional element of retention for our NEOs as they play a vital role in leading the organization throughout the year. Below are the AIP payments that will be made to our NEOs in April 2022.

 

Name2021 AIP Payment
Kurt Sievers$3,331,790

William Betz(1)

$525,000

Andrew Micallef(2)

$488,105

Stephen Owen

$799,630

Jennifer Wuamett

$774,354

Peter Kelly

$1,409,625

1.

NXP’sBecause Mr. Betz was not part of the management team during the 1H Performance Period, $165,000 of the amount above was received in October 2021 based on the 1H Performance Period Payout Factor and his salary, AIP target and individual performance for revenue growthbefore he was-6% yielding a 0% payout CFO. His 2H Performance Period payment is based on the 2H Performance Period Payout Factor and his new salary and AIP target as CFO.

(2)2.

NXP’snon- GAAP gross margin is below 54% threshold though it did improve year over yearMr. Micallef joined the company in May 2021. In order to 53.5%have his 2021 AIP payment be reflective of when he was an employee of the company, his AIP payment was determined as follows: an amount equal to the 1H Performance Period Payout Factor multiplied by his AIP target and his prorated salary for the 1H performance period plus an amount equal to the 2H Performance Payout Period Factor multiplied by his AIP target and his 2H performance period salary.

57


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

As previously discussed, the HRCC has approved including a sustainability component in our Annual Incentive Program starting in 2022. The financial targets will continue to focus on non-GAAP revenue and gross margin set on a semiannual basis. This practice helped to communicate more transparently with employees as well as build momentum toward exceeding expectations. The new sustainability component will consist of environment and people metrics related to increasing renewable electricity, reducing carbon emissions, updating water recycling goals, ensuring employee safety, increasing female representation and advancing desired culture. The sustainability component will be evaluated on an annual basis and paid with the 2H financial payment. Below is the 2022 AIP framework.

LOGO

Long-Term Incentive (“LTI”) Program

A fundamental underpinning of our LTI program design is to align our NEOs’ and other key strategic decision makers’ interests with those of our shareholders. The roles that our executives playOur NEOs are critical to NXP’s long-term success, including driving our vision, strategy, and corporate culture. As a result, we tie over 70% of our executives’NEO’s target payLTI to both Company and NXP’s relative stock price performanceperformance.

In establishing the LTI program for 2021, consistent with 2019 and 2020, the HRCC considered the following:

Expected long-term contribution of each role and individual

Competitive market practice for each role as compared to our Peer Group and general competitive talent market practice

Connection to shareholder interests through recognizing stock price appreciation

Simplicity in the usenumber of LTI. For 2019, wemeasures

Importance of establishing and retaining our high performing executive team

Appropriate balance between time-based and performance-based LTI

58


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

NXP granted the following types of LTI awards to our NEOs:NEOs in 2021:

 

LTI Award

Type

  Target
Weighting
  Vesting Schedule  Vesting Provisions

PSUs

  70%  100% after year 3 to the extent earned once results have been certified by the Committee  Performance-based contingent on NXP’s Relative Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”)RTSR performance against the Peer Group with a vesting range of 0 – 200%

RSUs

  3030%  1/3rd per year starting on the first anniversary of the grant date  Service-based

PSUs: For all grants made under our 2019 PSU grants,2021 LTI program, the number of shares earned will be contingent upon NXP’s relative TSRRTSR performance versus the Peer Group from October 29, 2019November 2, 2021 through October 28, 2022. TSRNovember 1, 2024. The peer group used for this purpose is the same Peer Group described above in the section ‘Peer Group Analysis and Benchmarking’ except for the removal of Maxim Integrated Products.

RTSR is a powerful measure that aligns directly with shareholder interests forvia stock price appreciation thatand returns to shareholders via dividends. It also reflects the important performance factors influencing TSRour relative performance including financial performance as well as other considerations such as items discussed in the Governance and Sustainability sections of this proxy.proxy statement. The HRCC determined to continue RTSR as the sole measure used in assessing PSU performance after considering shareholder feedback and reviewing other options as well as the prevailing market practice. The number of PSUs ultimately earned at the end of the three-year performance period will be based on the following payout schedule in the table below, with the overall payout opportunity capped at 200% of target for performance at or above the 75th percentile of the Peer Group:Group. Prevailing market practice within our Peer Group shows similar payout structure to that presented in the table below with target vesting earned by achieving median performance.

For the awards granted in 2021, the Committee evaluated the full payout structure, considered shareholder feedback and determined that the percentage of target PSUs awarded at second quartile performance should be reduced from 50% to 25%. This reduction further reinforces our pay for performance compensation philosophy by further reducing compensation in the event of relative underperformance.

 

NXP Relative TSR

Percentile Rank vs. Peers

% of Target PSUs Vesting
75th Percentile or Greater200%

50th Percentile

100%

25th Percentile

50%

Less than 25th Percentile

0%
   

NXP Relative TSR

Percentile Rank vs. Peer Group

  % of Target PSUs
Vesting in 2020
  % of Target PSUs
Vesting in 2021
Maximum 75th Percentile or Greater—Top Quartile  200%  200%

Target

 

50th Percentile—Third Quartile

  100%  100%

Threshold

 

25th Percentile—Second Quartile

  50%  25%
  

Less than 25th Percentile—First Quartile

  0%  0%

For performance between thosethe levels shown in the preceding table, the percentage of target PSUs tothat will vest will be determined using linear interpolation. The final number of PSUs earned will be capped at 100% of target if NXP’s TSRtotal shareholder return for the performance period is negative, regardless of the Company’s relative performance.performance compared to the Peer Group.

RSUs:RSUs: The RSUs granted to our NEOs vest 1/3rd per year starting on the first anniversary of the grant date. We believe that RSUs provide an important long-term retention incentive for our NEOs and further align their interests with those of our shareholders, but in accordance with our pay for performance philosophy, we limit the time-based RSUs to 30% of the LTI awards.

2021 Target LTI Awards

Following thoughtful consideration of all relevant factors, the HRCC approved the individual annual LTI grant values to our NEOs in November 2021 as follows to be earned over the next three years. These grants were made in the customary granting cycle for NEOs and other employees. The grants are fully outlined in the Grants of Plan Based Awards on page 68.

For the annual LTI award granted to our CEO, the HRCC considered many important factors including:

 

44Record breaking performance in 2021

59


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

 

2019Effective transition in leadership and in establishing the new leadership team

Exceptional leadership in advancing NXP’s strategy

Extraordinary professionalism in handling the COVID-19 pandemic impacts especially regarding employee safety, engagement, and wellbeing

Customer support and collaboration through supply chain challenges

Name  2021
Annual LTI
Grant Value
($)
   

70%

PSUs

($)

   

PSUs Granted

(at Target)

(#)

   

30%

RSUs

($)

   

RSUs Granted

(#)

 

Kurt Sievers

  $14,000,000   $9,800,000    47,444   $4,200,000    20,334 

William Betz

  $2,500,000   $1,750,000    8,473   $750,000    3,631 

Andrew Micallef

  $1,900,000   $1,330,000    6,439   $570,000    2,760 

Stephen Owen

  $2,500,000   $1,750,000    8,473   $750,000    3,631 

Jennifer Wuamett

  $2,200,000   $1,540,000    7,456   $660,000    3,196 

Mr. Sievers was awarded a total of $14 million in LTI Awardsin 2020, including a promotional grant upon his promotion to CEO and during the annual granting process in November 2020. The Committee determined that maintaining the same level was appropriate given his extraordinary leadership during 2021 to reach exceptional financial performance and overcome challenges. In addition to his annual LTI grant, Mr. Micallef also received a $1,000,000 RSU new hire grant (equal to 4,750 shares) in August 2021 that is not reflected above. Mr. Kelly did not receive any new equity grants during 2021.

In determiningThe number of shares awarded under the LTI program are determined by taking the target annual LTI award levels for 2019,value and dividing it by the grant date closing price. For the annual LTI awards on November 2, 2021, the grant date closing price was $206.56. The amounts reported in the 2021 Summary Compensation Committee holistically assessed each individual’s role, experience, contributions toTable include the Company, market data, and internal equity with other executives with similar level roles and responsibilities. The Compensation Committee also considered the appropriate balance between time-vested and performance-vested awards and the strong Compensation Philosophies of aligning to shareholder interests and paying for performance as outlined earlier. Following thoughtful consideration of all relevant factors, the Compensation Committee approved the individual target LTI levels and grants to our NEOs for 2019 as follows to be earned over the next three years:

Name  

Target LTI

($)

   

70%

PSUs

($)

   

PSUs Granted

(at Target)

(#)

   

30%

RSUs

($)

   

RSUs Granted

(#)

 

Richard Clemmer

  $15,000,000   $10,500,000    91,776   $4,500,000    39,333 

Kurt Sievers

  $6,500,000   $4,550,000    39,770   $1,950,000    17,044 

Peter Kelly

  $3,000,000   $2,100,000    18,356   $900,000    7,867 

Stephen Owen

  $2,500,000   $1,750,000    15,296   $750,000    6,556 

David Reed

  $2,000,000   $1,400,000    12,237   $600,000    5,245 

2018Re-Boot Awards

In 2018, the anticipated acquisition of NXP by Qualcomm was terminated. Our Board and CEO recognized that keeping key, strategic leaders focused on delivering future performance was crucial. In addition, our CEO and NEOs met with our top shareholders to discuss our intent.

There was an immediate need to secure the continued services and drive performance of our strong, committed, and well-equipped leadership team to ensure that NXP continued to be a high performing, innovative, and customer-focused organization. The loss of our key, strategic leaders was identified as a risk to continued business performance. To help accomplish this objective, the Nominating and Compensation Committee awarded our CEO and other NEOs, as well other executives, LTI grants with a higher target value than in previous years.

For our NEOs, a large majority of these awards were performance-based; comprised of 70% PSUs contingent upon NXP’s relative TSR performance over a three-year performance period, and 30% RSUs that vest ratably over a three-year period. The Compensation Committee believes that these awards enhanced alignment of the interests of our executives and other key employees with those of our shareholders and other stakeholders, as it secures continued services of a well-equipped leadership team and drives the immediate focus to restore NXPspre-transaction share price. The grant date fair value of these awards is shown for 2018 in the Summary Compensation Table of this proxy. The total target value of allre-boot grants to the approximately 150 recipients (including the NEOs) represented approximately 10% of thebreak-up fee NXP received from Qualcomm due to the terminationvalues (i.e., accounting values) of the transaction. The Compensation Committee believed that thesere-boot LTI grants were an appropriate investment to ensure our leadership team was engaged, retained, and fully focused onre-establishing and successfully executing ourgo-forward corporate strategy.

45


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

awards.

Executive Share Ownership Guidelines

In addition to our strongpay-for-performance philosophy and overall executive compensation program design, we further align our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders through the NXP Executive Equity Ownership Policy (the “EOP”). The EOP applies to all NEOs as well as other senior executives of the Company. All of the NEOs are in compliance with their respective ownership guideline.

 

EOP Level  NXP EOP Policy

President & CEO

  6.0x base salary

President & EVPsManagement Team: Section 16 Officers

  3.0x base salary

Board of Directors

  5.0x annual cash retainer

Compliance Window

  5 years

Policy if EOP not met

  Retain 100% of the net shares received from LTI grants until EOP is met, with Committee to retainHRCC discretion to assess special situations on acase-by-case basis

Shares Counted towards EOP

  Shares directly or beneficially owned; unvested time-based restricted stock units (RSUs)

Other Practices & Guidelines

In addition to the components of pay described previously in this CD&A, we have some other arrangements with our CEO and other NEOs.

Retirement Benefits

As approved by the Compensation Committee,HRCC, the Company provides retirement and deferred compensation benefits to help the Company attract and retain the most highly talented senior executives. Our NEOs participate in various pension and retirement arrangements consistent with other employees in their respective jurisdictions.jurisdictions of employment. In addition, Messrs. Clemmer andMr. Owen receivereceives a cash paymentspayment in lieu of participation in a defined benefit pension arrangement. Due to legislative changes in the Netherlands effective January 1, 2015, a new pension arrangement applies providing these cash payments. The values of all retirement related payments made to our NEOs are included in the Summary Compensation Table on page 51.66.

60


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

Other Benefits and Perquisites

Our NEOs other than our CEO, participate in medical and dental insurance, life insurance, short- and long-term disability programs, leave of absence, and other similar policies on the same terms as our other employees in their country of residence. Ourresidence except our CEO is enrolled inprovided with an international medical plan that provides access to medical care globally due toinsurance policy, reflective of the international travel required in his demanding, global travel requirements.position.

We also provide limited perquisites and personal benefits based on considerations unique to each NEO’s position and location. These additional arrangements can include one or more expenses such as tax preparation, car lease, security, housing, family travel, relocation allowances, and mobility arrangements which are broadly in line with those typical for global executives. Certain executives are also provided benefits under the Global Transfer Policy as described below. The values of all perquisites and other personal benefits provided to our NEOs are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table on page 51.66.

Consistent with regulatory requirements, the Company’s policy forbids personal loans, guarantees or similar arrangements to members of our Board and NEOs, and consequently no loans, guarantees or similar arrangements were granted.

Employment Arrangements of Named Executive Officers

We have a management services agreementemployment agreements with all of our NEOs. The key practices related to these agreements were outlined on page 51. We do not provide excessive separation payments, any excise tax gross ups or single trigger change in control arrangements.

Mr. Sievers

In connection with Mr. Clemmer, ourSievers’ nomination as Executive Director and CEO,President and employment agreements with Messrs. Kelly,Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Sievers and Owen.

Mr. Clemmer

Until the AGM, the employment arrangements for Mr. Clemmer are outlined in the management services agreement as amended over time from his hire in 2009. A subsidiary of the Company entered into an employmenta management agreement with Mr. Clemmer effective as of January 1, 2009. As of the Company’s initial public offering in August 2010, Mr. Clemmer became Executive Director(the “Management Agreement”) and CEO of a listed

46


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

company. His contract was extended and amended, most recently as of November 28, 2018. In addition to his base salary and bonus, Mr. Clemmer’s current management services agreement also provides him with certain benefits and perquisites as described previously, as well as with severance upon a qualifying termination of employment. Mr. Clemmer is subject tonon-competition provisions that remain in effect for a period of one year following the termination of his management services agreement. This agreement and underlying compensation of our CEO is determined by the Board in accordance with the principles set forth in the remuneration policy for executive andnon-executive directors previously approved by our general meeting of shareholders, as required under Dutch corporate law.

To ensure a smooth CEO transition, Mr. Clemmer will remain a strategic advisor to the CEO under an agreement with NXP USA, Inc. (“NXP USA”),Semiconductors Germany GmbH, a wholly owned indirect subsidiaryaffiliate of the Company, and Mr. Sievers entered into an addendum to Mr. Sievers’ existing employment agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”“Secondment Addendum” and together with the Management Agreement, are the “CEO Agreements”). Under the Advisory Agreement, effective May 28, 2020, Mr. Clemmer will serve as strategic advisor to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer until October 31, 2021, unless terminated on an earlier date by NXP USA. During the term of the Advisory Agreement, Mr. Clemmer will be paid abi-weekly salary of the US$ equivalent of EUR 46,153.86. Mr. Clemmer will be eligible for a cash bonus under the Company’s annual incentive plan for the period January 1, 2020 until May 28, 2020, but will not be entitled to a cash bonus or equity grants as of May 28, 2020. In the event Mr. Clemmer’s employment is terminated prior to October 31, 2021, other than for cause, he will be entitled to a fixed gross severance amount equal to the amount of the base salary he would have received from the date of termination of employment through October 31, 2021. The Advisory Agreement provides the Mr. Clemmer’s equity awards will continue to vest, subject to achieving the targets, through his employment under the Advisory Agreement, including any extensions thereof and accelerated vesting upon death and change of control would continue to apply during this period. Unless in the event of termination of Mr. Clemmer’s employment for cause, Reboot RSUs and Reboot PSUs granted on July 26, 2018 shall continue to vest until July 26, 2021 (full vesting), subject to achieving the targets. The Advisory Agreement containsnon-compete andnon-solicitation provisions that apply until the earlier of (i) one year from the end of his employment under the Advisory Agreement or (ii) June 1, 2022. A copy of the Advisory AgreementCEO Agreements can be found as Exhibit 10.3 onForm 8-K filed by the Company on March 9, 2020.

Mr. Sievers

On October 23, 2009, The CEO Agreements provide that effective May 27, 2020,Mr. Sievers enteredserves as Executive Director and President and Chief Executive Officer until the date of the following annual general meeting, and will be extended if NXP‘s general meeting reappoints Mr. Sievers as Executive Director and President and CEO of NXP. Under the CEO Agreements, Mr. Sievers receives a gross annual base salary of 1 million and is eligible for payment under the AIP, with a target cash incentive percentage of 150% of his annual base salary and the maximum annual incentive opportunity equal to 200% of the at target incentive opportunity. The actual amount payable to Mr. Sievers as an annual incentive bonus is dependent upon the achievement of performance targets which are set by the HRCC and which are expected to be substantially the same as the targets established under the plan for other executives. Depending on performance, the actual amount payable as an annual cash bonus to Mr. Sievers may be less than, greater than or equal to the stated target bonus (and could be zero).

Considering Mr. Sievers’ tenure—he has been employed at NXP since 1995—the HRCC considered it reasonable to provide in the CEO agreements that in the event that Mr. Sievers’ employment is terminated at the initiative of the Company and other than for cause, Mr. Sievers will be entitled to a severance amount of two times the gross annual base salary and a pro-rata payment of the annual cash bonus, depending on achievement of the pay-out conditions and the period in which Mr. Sievers has performed actual work for the Company. One additional element the HRCC took into an employment agreement withaccount was that Mr. Sievers, being employed by the Company’s wholly ownedGerman subsidiary in Germany, NXP Semiconductors Germany GmbH, where Mr. Sievers’ employment is based. This agreement was amended effective September 7, 2018, in connection with Mr. Sievers’ promotionthe absence of the severance arrangements in the CEO Agreements, would be entitled to President. In addition toa severance amount that could be as high as four times his base salary, and bonus, Mr. Sievers’according to German employment agreement also provides him with certain benefits and perquisites as described above. German labor laws govern the entitlement, if any, of a severance paymentlaw, in the eventabsence of termination of employment. the lesser severance arrangements in the CEO Agreements.

Mr. Sievers is subject tonon-competition provisions that remain in effect for a period of one year following the termination of his employment agreement. See the discussion above for employment arrangements entered in 2020.

A description of the agreements entered into by Mr. Sievers in connection with his appointment as executive director and chief executive officer/president is included above under Item 3:(Re-) appointment of Directors.

Mr. KellyBetz

On June 19, 2012,October 12, 2021, NXP USA, Inc. (“NXP USA”), a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of the Company, entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Kelly,William Betz setting forth the terms and conditions of his employment as amended on August 17, 2018, providing Mr. Kelly’sour Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, including his base salary, bonusannual incentive target and participation in certain benefits plans, policies and perquisitesprograms applicable to other NXP executives and officers. Either Mr. Betz or NXP USA may terminate Mr. Betz’s employment for any reason upon three months’

61


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

written notice, and NXP USA may terminate his employment immediately under certain conditions involving misconduct. In the event that NXP USA terminates Mr. Betz’s employment absent certain conditions involving misconduct, Mr. Betz is entitled to receive a lump sum cash severance payment of one year’s base salary and pro rata payment of the annual incentive bonus for the period that Mr. Betz performed actual work, to the extent the conditions for a bonus payout have been met. In the event Mr. Betz’s employment is terminated within twelve months following a change of control or if Mr. Betz resigns for “good reason” within twelve months following a change of control, in either case not under certain conditions involving misconduct, then Mr. Betz is entitled to the change of control arrangements approved from time to time by the Company’s HRCC, as described above.below. All severance payments are contingent on Mr. Kelly’s employment agreement also provides him with severance uponBetz signing and not revoking a qualifying terminationrelease of employment.claims. Mr. KellyBetz is subject tonon-competition provisions that remain in effectand non-solicitation restrictions for a period of one yeartwelve months and customary prohibitions on disclosing confidential information following the termination of his employment agreement.for any reason.

Mr. Micallef

Effective May 10, 2021, NXP USA, entered into an employment agreement with Andrew Micallef setting forth the terms and conditions of his employment as Executive Vice President Global Operations, including his base salary, annual incentive target and participation in certain benefits plans, policies and programs applicable to other NXP executives and officers. Either Mr. Micallef or NXP USA may terminate Mr. Micallef’s employment for any reason upon three months’ written notice, and NXP USA may terminate his employment immediately under certain conditions involving misconduct. In the event that NXP USA terminates Mr. Micallef’s employment absent certain conditions involving misconduct, Mr. Micallef is entitled to receive a lump sum cash severance payment of one year’s base salary and pro rata payment of the annual incentive bonus for the period that Mr. Micallef performed actual work, to the extent the conditions for a bonus payout have been met. In the event Mr. Micallef’s employment is terminated within twelve months following a change of control or if Mr. Micallef resigns for “good reason” within twelve months following a change of control, in either case not under certain conditions involving misconduct, then Mr. Micallef is entitled to the change of control arrangements approved from time to time by the Company’s HRCC, as described below. All severance payments are contingent on Mr. Micallef signing and not revoking a release of claims. Mr. Micallef is subject to non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions for twelve months and customary prohibitions on disclosing confidential information following the termination of his employment for any reason.

Mr. Owen

On March 18, 2013, Mr. Owen entered into an employment agreement with the Company providing Mr. Owen’s base salary and bonus and certain benefits and perquisites as described above. Mr. Owen’s agreement provides that Dutch labor law governs the entitlement, if any, of a severance payment in the event of termination of employment. Mr. Owen is subject tonon-competition provisions that remain in effect for a period of one year following the termination of his employment agreement.

Ms. Wuamett

On August 25, 2021, NXP USA entered into an employment agreement with Jennifer Wuamett, the Company’s Executive Vice President and General Counsel. The employment agreement documents the terms and conditions of her employment as Executive Vice President and General Counsel, a position she has held since September 1, 2018, including her base salary, annual incentive target and participation in certain benefits plans, policies and programs applicable to other NXP executives and officers. Either Ms. Wuamett or NXP USA may terminate Ms. Wuamett’s employment for any reason upon three months’ written notice and NXP USA may terminate her employment immediately under certain conditions involving misconduct. In the event that NXP USA terminates Ms. Wuamett’s employment absent certain conditions involving misconduct, Ms. Wuamett is entitled to receive a lump sum cash severance payment of one year’s base salary and pro rata payment of the annual incentive bonus for the period that Ms. Wuamett performed actual work, to the extent the conditions for a bonus payout have been met. In the event Ms. Wuamett’s employment is terminated within twelve months following a change of control or if Ms. Wuamett resigns for “good reason” within twelve months following a change of control, in either case not under certain conditions involving misconduct, then Ms. Wuamett is entitled to the change of control arrangements approved from time to time by the Company’s HRCC, as described below. All severance payments are contingent on Ms. Wuamett signing and not revoking a release of claims. Ms. Wuamett is subject to non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions for twelve months and customary prohibitions on disclosing confidential information following the termination of her employment for any reason.

Mr. Kelly

On June 19, 2012, the Company entered into an agreement with Mr. Kelly, as amended on August 17, 2018, providing Mr. Kelly’s base salary, bonus and certain benefits and perquisites as described above. Mr. Kelly’s employment agreement also provides him with severance upon a qualifying termination of employment. Upon his retirement on February 28, 2022 no severance payments will be made under this agreement. Mr. Kelly is subject to non-competition provisions that remain in effect for a period of one year following the termination of his employment agreement.

62


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

Key Policies and Practices

ClawbackClaw back Policy

AIP payments and LTI grants are subject to the clawbackclaw back provisions mandated pursuant to Dutch corporate law.law for our board of directors, including the CEO. Under this provision, the Company is entitled to recover any performance-based compensation awarded in full or in part to the extent that such payment was made based on incorrect information regarding the performance againstpre-established goals or about the circumstances from which the entitlement to the award was made dependent.

47


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

Derivatives Trading, Hedging, and Pledging Policies

NXP employees and directors are prohibited at all times from, either directly, or indirectly, purchasing financial instruments (includingpre-paid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds), or otherwise engaging in transactions, that hedge or offset, or are designed to hedge or offset, any decrease in the market value of NXP securities. No NXP employee or director may engage in hedging, pledging, hypothecating (including holding in margin accounts), or short selling NXP securities, or causing any other person to do so.

Change of Control Policy

The Board believes that having a clear, consistent policy that determines the appropriate treatment of our NEOs in the event of a change of control of the Company is in the best interest of NXP. This ensures our executives are able to fully focus on the potential transaction in the best interest of the shareholders, without concern for their own disposition. The change of control benefits for our NEOs are described in the table and narrative under the “Potential Payments Upon Termination of Change of Control Table” section of this proxy onpages 55-57. page 72. All NEOs have a double-trigger provision such that, if they are involuntarily terminated without cause or leave with good reason (as defined in the applicable agreement) within 12 months following a change of control, they will receive the following benefits:

 

Severance payment of a minimum of 24 months of base pay and 2 times target bonus or the local regulatory program in their country of residence, whichever is higher

 

Accelerated vesting of outstanding unvested equity in accordance with the applicable equity plan or award agreement

 

For those NEOs who are either citizens of the United States or reside in the United States, 12 months of benefits continuation

 

Our NEOs are not entitled to excise taxgross-ups in connection with these payments

Global Transfer Policy

NXP maintains policies pertaining to international travel and relocation in the event that an employee, including our NEOs, is expected to travel to, relocate to or maintain residences in an international location. The Company provides allowances and reimbursements for responding to:

The needs of the employee and accompanying/impacted family members

Competitive compensation policies that ensure equitable treatment

NXP’s business conditions and culture

Terms and conditions that follow host country practices

The policy provides for relocation support and ongoing housing and mobility allowances as well as medical care for the employee and their family who are required to reside in a host country for some period of time. The expatriation and repatriation activities include the moving of household goods, temporary storage, relocation allowances, travel and other such expenses related to moving to and from the transfer location. Between 2017 and 2019, our CEO and CFO participated in aspects of the policy that are included in the Summary Compensation Table under All Other Compensation.

Compensation Practices and Risk

The Compensation CommitteeHRCC has oversight responsibility for evaluating risks related to the Company’s compensation policies and practices. The Committee believes our compensation programs balance an appropriate mix of short- and long-term performance objectives, cash- and equity-based compensation, and risks and rewards for our employees. Our programs incorporate key design features to mitigate the likelihood of excessive risk-taking behavior, including:

 

reasonableReasonable performance goals are established by the Compensation CommitteeHRCC for AIP, our short-term cash incentive program, incorporatingtop-line (e.g., revenue growth and market share gain)growth) and bottom-line (e.g., adjusted gross margin) business performance factors;factors

 

48


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

allAll eligible NXP employees, including NEOs, are measured against the same business performance factors for AIP;AIP

 

ourOur short-term cash incentive programs include maximum payout limitations of 200% and the maximum individual bonus payment under AIP is two times the applicable bonus target;target

 

long-termLong-term incentive awards for our NEOs contain a mix of performance-based and time-based vesting, and the performance-based awards granted since 2018 measure relative total shareholder return performance over a three-year performance period; andperiod

 

ourOur performance-based restricted share units have a maximum performance factor of 200%.

Additionally, we have a strong internal control environment, including a written Code of Conduct and ethics and compliance training for all employees including our NEOs. Based on a review of our compensation program design, the Compensation CommitteeHRCC believes that there are no significant risks and our policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material negative impact on our Company.

63


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

Governance

The Compensation CommitteeHRCC oversees the compensation and benefits programs for our NEOs and is comprised solely of independent,non-employee members of the Board. The Compensation CommitteeHRCC works very closely with its independent compensation consultant and with management to examine the effectiveness of the Company’s executive compensation program throughout the year. The Compensation CommitteeHRCC Charter, which may be accessed athttp://investors.nxp.com, details full authority and responsibility.

The Role of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee is the successor of the Board’s Nominating and Compensation Committee that was split by the Board into two separate committees on September 1, 2019: the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Compensation CommitteeHRCC is accountable for ensuring that the links between our executive compensation program and our business goals are responsible, appropriate, and strongly aligned with shareholders’ and other stakeholders’ interests. Under the responsibility of and as assigned by the Board, the Compensation CommitteeHRCC annually establishes the compensation levels of our NEOs and reports to the full Board for their approval considering several factors, including:

 

Each NEO’s role, responsibilities, experience, capability, and performance

 

The Company’s historicalNEO succession planning, excluding CEO, and anticipated future performanceimportant talent management activities

Human capital statistics and activities below NEOs

 

Compensation practices of the companies in our peer groupPeer Group

 

Survey data from a broader group of comparable public companies (where appropriate)

Relationship between the Company’s compensation policies and practices and risk management

The HRCC is also responsible to review the remuneration of the non-executive directors, and recommend from time to time to the Board an amendment concerning the remuneration to be resolved by the General Meeting of Shareholders including retainers, fees and equity grants.

The Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committee is accountable for the important talent management activities of the organization.corporate governance matters and initiatives and reporting on environment, social and governance (ESG). Under the responsibility of and as assigned by the Board, the key focus areas for the Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSustainability Committee in these activities are: managing CEO and executiveBoard succession, nominating director candidates, evaluating organization effectiveness, and reviewing leadership development practices.

TheNXP top identified risks and make proposals to the Board believes that having separate committees (the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee) to oversee the above practices allows for the proper support to and oversight of these important initiatives.on oversight.

Further, the compensation of our CEO is determined by the Board in accordance with the principles set forth in the remuneration policy for executive andnon-executive directors previously approved by our general meeting of shareholders, as required under Dutch corporate law.

The Role of Management

Our CEO makes key pay recommendations for his direct leadershipmanagement team to the Compensation Committee.HRCC. In addition, staff from NXP’s Human Resources Grouporganization provides support to the Compensation CommitteeHRCC on various compensation and benefits issues, including market practices, Company policies, and recommendations for program changes. Mr. ClemmerOur CEO and NXP’s other executive officers do not make recommendations to or participate in the deliberations of the Compensation CommitteeHRCC regarding such officer’sthe CEO’s own compensation.

49


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

The Role of the Independent Consultant

The Compensation CommitteeHRCC has retained Mercer during 2019since 2014 to serve as its executive compensation consultant. Mercer provides advice directly to the Compensation Committee.HRCC. Other teams within Mercer and its affiliates perform services for us primarily in benchmarking employee compensation and benefits in ournon-US operations. They also operate as our broker of record for somenon-US countries and assist in the selection of benefits related vendor selection and management.described below. The individuals supporting the Compensation CommitteeHRCC did not perform any services for us other than as directed by the Compensation Committee.HRCC.

During fiscal 2019,2021, Mercer advised the Compensation CommitteeHRCC on a variety of subjects such as compensation plan design and trends, pay for performance analytics, external competitive compensation reference points, and other such matters. Mercer reports directly to the Compensation Committee,HRCC, participates in meetings as requested and communicates with the Compensation CommitteeHRCC Chair between meetings, as necessary. The Compensation CommitteeHRCC has the sole authority to:

 

modifyModify or approve Mercer’s compensation

 

64


determineEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

Determine the nature and scope of its services

 

evaluateEvaluate its performance

 

terminateTerminate the engagement and hire a replacement or additional consultant at any time.time

As noted above, in 2021 other teams within Mercer or its affiliates provided services at the request of management to the Company not related to advising the HRCC on executive officer and director compensation matters. Fees paid to Mercer and its affiliates for services provided in 2021 related to executive and director compensation totaled approximately $310,000. Fees paid to Mercer and its affiliates for actuarial valuations of pension plans, market compensation survey data and consulting services related to broad-based employee benefit plans totaled approximately $160,000. In addition, Mercer acts as the broker of record for broad-based employee benefit plans in various countries in which we operate. As broker of record they received commissions directly from the benefit providers of approximately $1,100,000. In addition, in 2021, the Company paid Marsh, an affiliate of Mercer, approximately $100,000 for fees related to insurance brokerage services unrelated to employee benefit programs and site services. Additionally, as part of its insurance brokerage services, Marsh receives insurance premium payments from the Company which Marsh pays to insurance carriers on behalf of the Company. Because these other services were in the ordinary course of business, the HRCC did not specifically approve such services, although the HRCC reviewed these other services in connection with their independence review. Mercer informed us that it has safeguards and procedures in place to maintain independence in its executive compensation consulting practice. These safeguards include a rigidly enforced code of conduct, a policy against investing in client organizations and separation between Mercer’s executive compensation consulting and their other administrative and consulting business units from a leadership, performance measurement and compensation perspective. Specifically, Mercer has adopted Global Business Standards for Executive Compensation to manage actual or perceived conflicts of interest and ensure the integrity of their advice. It addresses how they manage the executive compensation consulting relationship, ensure the quality of consulting services and structure their business to prevent conflicts of interest. Mercer’s executive compensation consultants are not managed or rewarded based upon client revenue from other lines of business or other Marsh & McLennan (MMC) companies other than to the extent all employees benefit from overall success of MMC. The HRCC has assessed the independence of Mercer under NASDAQ listing standards and has concluded that no conflict of interest exists.

Human Resources and Compensation Committee Report

We, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of NXP Semiconductors N.V., have reviewed and discussed the CD&A set forth above with management of the Company, and based on such review and discussion, recommended to the Board that the CD&A be included in this report.proxy statement.

NXP Human Resources and Compensation Committee:

Peter Smitham, Chair

Sir Peter Bonfield

Annette Clayton

Lena Olving

Karl-Henrik Sundström

 

5065


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

 

Summary Compensation Table

The following table presents information regarding compensation of each of the NEOs for services rendered during the prior three fiscal years. A description of our compensation policies and practices as well as a description of the components of compensation payable to our NEOs is included above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

 

Name and

Principal Position

 Year  Salary
($)1
  Stock
Awards
($)2
  Nonequity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)1,3
  

Change in
Pension

Value &
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)1,4

  All other
Compensation
($)1,5
  Total
($)
 

Richard Clemmer6

Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer

  2019   1,345,200   17,455,843         1,756,959   20,558,002 
  2018   1,369,730   72,924,573   1,388,390      2,278,070   77,960,763 
  2017   1,291,625   15,902,770   774,006      1,780,198   19,748,599 

Kurt Sievers7

President

  2019   745,465   7,564,222      970,378   39,453   9,319,518 
  2018   671,498   24,308,253   513,059   674,480   49,840   26,217,130 
  2017   593,786   3,710,732   508,959   211,867   45,357   5,070,701 

Peter Kelly

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  2019   750,000   3,491,327         77,667   4,318,994 
  2018   601,878   12,761,961   490,000      97,771   13,951,610 
  2017   545,000   3,180,577   350,000      65,286   4,140,863 

Stephen Owen

Executive Vice President Global Sales and Marketing

  2019   504,450   2,909,363         165,659   3,579,472 
  2018   471,778   8,507,984   277,170      168,592   9,425,523 
  2017   424,133   2,438,524   299,720      159,576   3,321,953 

David Reed

Executive Vice President Technology & Operations

  2019   525,000   2,327,541         16,500   2,869,041 
  2018   473,077   7,292,528   275,000      13,750   8,054,355 
  2017   450,000   2,120,385   300,000      16,000   2,886,385 

Name and

Principal Position

 Year  Salary
($)1,2
  Stock
Awards
($)3
  Nonequity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)1,4
  

Change in
Pension

Value &
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)1,5

  All other
Compensation
($)1,6
  Total
($)
 
Kurt Sievers7 Executive Director, President and Chief Executive Officer  2021   1,181,800   16,314,944   3,331,790      83,358   20,911,892 
  2020   759,968   16,063,333      2,293,073   136,928   19,253,302 
  2019   745,465   7,564,222      970,378   39,453   9,319,518 
William Betz
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
  2021   351,115   2,913,589   525,000      22,435   3,812,139 
                            
                            
Andrew Micallef
Executive Vice President Global Operations
  2021   317,308   3,193,031   488,105         3,998,444 
                            
                            
Stephen Owen
Executive Vice President Global Sales and Marketing
  2021   531,810   2,913,589   799,630      135,904   4,380,933 
  2020   417,251   2,935,370         148,828   3,501,449 
  2019   504,450   2,909,363         165,659   3,579,472 
Jennifer Wuamett
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Sustainability Officer
  2021   494,654   2,564,043   774,354      17,000   3,850,051 
  2020   382,779   2,582,960         16,873   2,982,612 
                            
Peter Kelly8
Former Chief Financial Officer
  2021   752,884      1,409,625      42,585   2,205,094 
  2020   610,817   3,522,411         54,726   4,187,954 
  2019   750,000   3,491,327         77,667   4,318,994 

 

1 

All amounts presented in the Summary Compensation Table, and in the supporting tables that follow, are expressed in U.S. dollars. Certain amounts payable to Messrs. Clemmer, Sievers Kelly (prior to September 2018) and Owen were paid in euros. The exchange rate used for the purpose of the Summary Compensation Table is the average monthly rate for the full year, and in the supporting tables that follow was (i) 1.1210,is the average euro to U.S. dollar conversation ratemonthly rates for 2019,the full year: (i) 1.1818 for 2021, (ii) 1.1794, the average euro to U.S. dollar conversation rate1.1412 for 2018,2020, and (iii) 1.1310, the average euro to U.S. dollar conversation rate1.1210 for 2017.2019.

2

For Messrs. Sievers, Kelly and Owen and Ms. Wuamett, the 2020 salaries listed reflect a 25% voluntary reduction in their base salary from April 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. The increased salary in 2021 in the table above for Messrs. Sievers, Owen and Kelly is a reflection of the termination of the voluntary reduction in base salary on December 31, 2020 – the annualized salary remained 1 million, 450,000 and $750,000, respectively, in 2021.

3 

These amounts represent the aggregate weighted grant date fair value of RSU and PSU awards. During 2018, we granted “reboot’ grants to our NEOs, as described on page 45 which distortawards in the year over year comparison of awards.fiscal years shown. The total stock award value is calculated in accordance with ASC 718. See noteNote 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies ‘Share-based Compensation’compensation’ and Note 18—17—Share-based Compensation, compensation, both found in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 20192021 for additional information. For a description of the grant terms, see the footnotes of the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table below. Assuming maximum achievement of performance metrics in the performance period, using the Company’s closing stock price on the date of grant and 200% of the target shares, the maximum values of the 20192021 PSUs at the date of grant are as follows: Mr. Clemmer—Sievers—$21,000,184;19,600,065; Mr. Sievers—Betz—$9,100,171;3,500,366; Mr. Kelly—Micallef—$4,200,220;2,660,080; Mr. Owen—$ 3,500,031 ; Mr. Reed—3,500,366; and Ms. Wuamett—$2,800,070.3,080,223. The realized value of these awards, if any, will not be determined until November 2024 based on the comparative RTSR over the performance period.

34 

The payout amount for 2021 represents 187.95% of the NEO’s target AIP, the average of the 175.9% of the target incentive amount for the first half of 2021 and 200% of the target incentive amount for the second half of 2021 as discussed in the section ‘Annual Incentive Program’ above. The amounts reported for 2021 will be paid in April 2022. Because the payout date has not yet occurred, the amounts listed above are the amounts that have been accrued as annual incentive bonus for each NEO, except for $165,000 that was paid to Mr. Betz in October 2021 because Mr. Betz was not part of the management team during the 1H Performance Period. No incentive awards were earned in 2020 or 2019 under the Annual Incentive Plan due to a failure to meet the minimum performance thresholds determined in the plan.

45 

NXP does not maintain defined benefit plans except for those in countries where it is standard practice. These amounts for Mr. Sievers, who is located in Germany, is the only NEO who participates in a defined benefit pension plan. The amounts shown in this column represent the actuarial change in the present value of accrued benefit for the defined benefit plan of Mr. Sievers, as described in the ‘Pension Benefits’ table below. Based on the actuarial assumptions, primarily the discount rate, used to value Mr. Sievers’ accumulated benefit in 2021, the value of Mr. Sievers’s pension decreased by $341,078 from 2020. NXP does not maintain defined benefit plans except for those in countries where it is standard practice. Mr. Sievers is the only NEO who participates in a defined benefit pension plan in connection with his employment with our German subsidiary.

66


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

56 

The 20192021 amounts shown in the All Other Compensation column include the incremental cost to the Company of the following:

Mr. Clemmer—amounts paid by the company for tax return preparation, travel expenses for family members, security costs, Company contributions to a defined contribution plan, global transfer policy payments ($644,424), retirement allowance ($587,068) and taxgross-up payments ($382,676).

Mr. Sievers—amounts paid by the companyCompany for international insurance, executive physical, tax return preparation, a company car ($27,018), and taxgross-up payments associated with the services included in ‘All Other Compensation’($19,365)41,544).

Mr. Kelly—Betz—amounts paid by the companyCompany for tax return preparation ($38,628),and Company 401(k) contributions ($14,000)14,500), and a taxgross-up payments ($25,039).payment for the tax return preparation services.

Mr. Owen—amounts paid by the companyCompany for tax return preparation, mobility allowance, ($22,868), retirement allowance ($128,528)91,968) and Company contributions and premiums related to a defined contribution plan, ($12,916).and tax gross-up payments related to the defined benefit premiums paid on his behalf.

Mr. Reed—Ms. Wuamett—amounts paid by the companyCompany for executive physical and Company 401(k) contributions ($14,000)14,500).

6

Mr. Clemmer received an increase in base salary and corresponding increase in his target annual cash incentive opportunity in 2018, the first such increases in nine years. He did not receive any additional increases in base salary or target annual cash incentive opportunity in 2019.

Mr. Kelly—amounts paid by the Company for tax return preparation, Company 401(k) contributions ($14,500) and a tax gross-up payment for the tax return preparation services.

7

In July 2018, Mr. Sievers was promoted to PresidentCEO of the Company.Company in May 2020. His salary and incentive target annual cash incentive opportunity were increasedchanged to reflect his new, increased role. He also received a larger stock award in conjunction with his promotion as well as an annual grant at our normal time of granting to all selected employees including NEOs. The 2021 annual grant is reflective of the strategic role, his handling of COVID-19 and the need to ensure his longer termlong-term retention as well as alignment to company shareholder interests.

8

Mr. Kelly served as our Chief Financial Officer until October 12, 2021. Until his retirement on February 28, 2022, Mr. Kelly remained in service as an Executive Vice President, reporting to Kurt Sievers, under the terms and conditions of Mr. Kelly’s existing employment agreement. In this role, Mr. Kelly provided advice and assistance to Mr. Sievers and transition assistance and support to Mr. Betz.

 

5167


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

 

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

The following table sets forth certain information regarding grants of plan-based awards to each of our NEOs for 20192021 under our compensation programs and plans.

 

Name 

Plan

Name

 

Grant

date

  Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(1)
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(2)
  

All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares or
Stock
Units

(#)(3)

 Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
($)(4)
  

Plan

Name

 

Grant

Date

  Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(1)
  

 

  Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(2)
  

All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares or
Stock
Units

(#)(3)

 Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
($)(4)
 
Threshold
($)
 

Target

($)

 Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
 

Target

(#)

 Maximum
(#)
  Threshold
($)
 

Target

($)

 Maximum
($)
     Threshold
(#)
 

Target

(#)

 Maximum
(#)
 

Richard Clemmer

 2019 AIP    403,560  2,017,800  4,035,600           
 2019 OIP  10/29/2019        45,888  91,776  183,552    13,069,820 
 2019 OIP  10/29/2019              39,333  4,386,023 

Kurt Sievers

 2019 AIP    149,093  745,465  1,490,930            2021 AIP    443,175  1,772,700  3,545,400             
 2019 OIP  10/29/2019        19,885  39,770  79,540    5,663,646  2019 OIP  11/2/2021          11,861  47,444  94,888    12,205,443 
 2019 OIP  10/29/2019              17,044  1,900,576  2019 OIP  11/2/2021                20,334  4,109,501 

Peter Kelly

 2019 AIP    150,000  750,000  1,500,000           

William Betz

 2021 AIP (1st Half)    20,625  82,500  165,000             
 2021 AIP (2nd Half)    45,000  180,000  360,000             
 2019 OIP  11/2/2021          2,118  8,473  16,946    2,179,764 
 2019 OIP  11/2/2021                3,631  733,825 

Andrew Micallef

 2021 AIP    63,462  253,846  507,692             
 2019 OIP  8/3/2021                4,750  978,738 
 2019 OIP  10/29/2019        9,178  18,356  36,712    2,614,078  2019 OIP  11/2/2021          1,610  6,439  12,878    1,656,497 
 2019 OIP  10/29/2019              7,867  877,249  2019 OIP  11/2/2021                2,760  557,796 

Stephen Owen

 2019 AIP    80,712  403,560  807,120            2021 AIP    106,362  425,448  850,896             
 2019 OIP  10/29/2019        7,648  15,296  30,592    2,178,303  2019 OIP  11/2/2021          2,118  8,473  16,946    2,179,764 
 2019 OIP  10/29/2019              6,556  731,060  2019 OIP  11/2/2021                3,631  733,825 

David Reed

 2019 AIP    84,000  420,000  840,000           

Jennifer Wuamett

 2021 AIP    103,000  412,000  824,000             
 2019 OIP  10/29/2019        6,119  12,237  24,474    1,742,671  2019 OIP  11/2/2021          1,864  7,456  14,912    1,918,131 
 2019 OIP  10/29/2019              5,245  584,870  2019 OIP  11/2/2021                3,196  645,912 

Peter Kelly(5)

 2021 AIP    187,500  750,000  1,500,000             

 

1

Future payouts under the Annual Incentive Program (AIP) are shown in USD from 25% if threshold payoutis met but not exceeded, target if performance target is achieved at 20% to the100% and a maximum of 200% of target AIP using the salary and target AIP as of December 31, 2021 per plan rules.the terms of the 2021 AIP as described above. Actual 2021 AIP payments are listed in the Summary Compensation Table.

2 

Amounts representsThe amounts with a grant date of November 2, 2021 represent the number of PSUs granted to Messrs. Clemmer, Sievers, Kelly,Betz, Micallef, Owen and ReedWuamett as part of the 20192021 annual grant under the NXP Semiconductors N.V. 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan (OIP)(2019 OIP). Each PSU, which cliff vests on the third anniversary of the date of grant, entitles the grant recipient to receive from 0 to 2 common shares for each of the PSUstarget units awarded based on the Relative TSRrelative total shareholder return (TSR) of the Company’s share price as compared to a set of peer companies.the Peer Group. See Long-term Incentive (LTI) Program above for a more detailed descriptiondescriptions of the terms of these awards.

3 

AmountsThe amounts with a grant date of November 2, 2021 represent the number of RSUs granted to Messrs. Clemmer, Sievers, Kelly,Betz, Micallef, Owen and ReedWuamett as part of the 20192021 annual grant under the 2019 OIP. The amount with a grant date of August 3, 2021 represents the number of RSUs granted to Mr. Micallef as a new hire award under the 2019 OIP. These awards vest in equal installments on the first, second and third anniversary of the date of grant, subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date. See Long-term Incentive (LTI) Program for a more detailed descriptiondescriptions of the terms of these awards.

4 

Amounts in this column represent the weighted average grant date fair value of awards granted in fiscal year 20192021 calculated in accordance with ASC 718. With respect to the PSUs, in accordance with SEC rules, amounts reflect the fair value at the grant date determined using a Monte-Carlo simulation model and based upon a discounted cash flow analysis of the probability-weighted payoffs of a share-based payment assuming a variety of possible stock price paths. It represents the estimate of aggregate compensation cost to be recognized over the requisite service period determined as of the grant date under ASC 718 resulting in a per share pricegrant date value of $142.41.$257.26 for grants on November 2, 2021. The fair value for RSUs is determined by using the grant date closing price corrected for future dividend payments resulting in fair value of $111.51$ 202.10 per share.share for grants on November 2, 2021 and $206.05 for the grant on August 3, 2021.

The Monte Carlo Simulation value used in calculating the value of PSUs was determined based on the following: the valuation date was November 2, 2021. The NXP share price on the grant date was $206.56. The performance period was November 2, 2021 to November 1, 2024. PSUs are subject to a relative TSR performance hurdle, where vesting is dependent on NXP’s TSR performance relative to its Peer Group. TSR is based on the average closing share price over the 20 trading days prior to the start of the Performance Period compared to the average closing share price over the 20 trading days up to and including the end of the Performance Period. Dividends were assumed to be re-invested on the ex-dividend date.

5

No equity grants were awarded to Mr. Kelly in 2021.

The Monte Carlo Simulation value used in calculating the value of PSUs was determined based on the following: The valuation date was October 29, 2019. The NXP share price on Grant Date was $114.41. The performance period was October 29, 2019 to October 28, 2022. PSUs are subject to a relative TSR performance hurdle, where vesting is dependent on NXP’s TSR performance relative to its Peer Group. TSR is based on the average closing share price over the 20 trading days prior to the start of the Performance Period compared to the average closing share price over the 20 trading days up to and including the end of the Performance Period. Dividends were assumed to bere-invested on theex-dividend date. The risk free interest rate was based on US Government Bonds of appropriate term. NXP dividend yield was based on historic and future yield estimates. The share price volatility was based on the actual volatility of NXP’s and each peer company’s daily closing share price over the three year period from October 31, 2016 to October 31, 2019. The NXP initial TSR was 5.9%

5268


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

 

Outstanding Equity Awards atYear-End Table

The following table summarizes the number of securities underlying outstanding equity awards for each of our NEOs as of December 31, 2019, assuming a2021, using the year end closing stock price of $127.26.$227.78.

 

  Option Awards  Share Awards 
Name 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

Exercisable

(#)

  

Option

Exercise

price

($)

  

Option
Expiration

Date

  

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not
Vested

(#)

  

Market

Value of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not
Vested

($)

  

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number

of Unearned
Shares, Units

or Other

Rights That

Have Not

Vested

(#)

  

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Market or

Payout Value

of Unearned
Shares, Units

or Other

Rights That

Have Not

Vested

($)(1)

 
Richard Clemmer  40,419(2)   64.18   10/23/2024                 
  82,939(3)   73.00   10/29/2025                 
  15,376(4)   76.31   2/4/2026                 
              45,455(11)   5,784,603         
              129,297(12)   16,454,336         
              39,333(17)   5,005,518         
                      71,918(13)   9,152,285 
                      13,105(14)   1,667,742 
                      905,076(15)   115,179,972 
                      183,552(16)   23,358,828 
Kurt Sievers  9,819(2)   64.18   10/23/2024                 
  26,067(3)   73.00   10/29/2025                 
              10,607(11)   1,349,847         
              43,100(12)   5,484,906         
              17,044(17)   2,169,019         
                      22,603(13)   2,876,458 
                      301,692(15)   38,393,324 
                      79,540(16)   10,122,260 
Peter Kelly  65,000(5)   16.84   11/1/2021                 
  40,000(6)   23.49   10/25/2022                 
  35,247(7)   39.58   10/24/2023                 
  42,401(2)   64.18   10/23/2024                 
  23,698(3)   73.00   10/29/2025                 
              9,091(11)   1,156,921         
              22,628(12)   2,879,639         
              7,867(17)   1,001,154         
                      20,548(13)   2,614,938 
                      158,390(15)   20,156,711 
                      36,712(16)   4,671,969 
Stephen Owen              6,970(11)   887,002         
              15,085(12)   1,919,717         
              6,556(17)   834,317         
                      14,384(13)   1,830,508 
                      105,594(15)   13,437,892 
                      30,592(16)   3,893,138 
David Reed  5,250(9)   36.61   1/5/2021                 
  7,120(10)   58.66   1/5/2022                 
  17,773(8)   86.25   12/7/2025                 
              6,061(11)   771,323         
              12,930(12)   1,645,472         
              5,245(17)   667,479         
                      10,435(13)   1,327,958 
                      90,508(15)   11,518,048 
                      24,474(16)   3,114,561 

53


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

  Option Awards  Share Awards 
Name 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

Exercisable

(#)

  

Option

Exercise

Price

($)

  

Option
Expiration

Date

  

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not
Vested

(#)

  

Market Value of

Shares or Units
of Stock That

Have Not

Vested

($)

  

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards:

Number

of Unearned
Shares, Units

or Other

Rights That

Have Not
Vested

(#)

  

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards:

Market or

Payout Value

of Unearned
Shares, Units

or Other

Rights That

Have Not
Vested

($)(1)

 
(a) (b)  (e)  (f)  (g)  (h)(1)  (i)  (j)(1) 

Kurt Sievers

              5,682(7)   1,294,246         
              5,207(8)   1,186,050         
              16,514(9)   3,761,559         
              20,334(10)   4,631,679         
                      39,770(12)   9,058,811 
                      18,223(13)   4,150,835 
                      57,795(14)   13,164,545 
                      47,444(15)   10,806,794 

William Betz

              692(7)   157,624         
              1,314(9)   299,303         
              3,631(10)   827,069         
                      2,076(12)   472,871 
                      1,971(14)   448,954 
                      8,473(15)   1,929,980 

Andrew Micallef

              4,750(11)   1,081,955         
              2,760(10)   628,673         
                      6,439(15)   1,466,675 

Stephen Owen

              2,186(7)   497,927         
              3,754(9)   855,086         
              3,631(10)   827,069         
                      15,296(12)   3,484,123 
                      13,136(14)   2,992,118 
                      8,473(15)   1,929,980 

Jennifer Wuamett

  8,394(2)   86.25   12/7/2025                 
              1,749(7)   398,387         
              3,303(9)   752,357         
              3,196(10)   727,985         
                      12,237(12)   2,787,344 
                      11,559(14)   2,632,909 
                      7,456(15)   1,698,328 

Peter Kelly

  40,000(3)   23.49   10/25/2022                 
  35,247(4)   39.58   10/24/2023                 
  42,401(5)   64.18   10/23/2024                 
  23,698(6)   73.00   10/29/2025                 
              2,623(7)   597,467         
              4,504(9)   1,025,921         
                      18,356(12)   4,181,130 
                       15,763(14)   3,590,496 

 

1 

Market value is calculated based on the closing price of NXP’s common stock on December 31, 20192021 as reported on the Nasdaq equaling $127.26.$227.78.

2

Options granted under the terms and conditions of the Global NXP Stock Option Program 2015/16 on December 7, 2015. The option vested in equal installments on October 29, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019.

3

Options granted under the terms and conditions of the Global NXP Stock Option Program 2012/13 on October 25, 2012. The option vested in equal installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversary of the date of grant, subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date.

69


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

4

Options granted under the terms and conditions of the Global NXP Stock Option Program 2013/14 on October 24, 2013. The option vested in equal installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversary of the date of grant, subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date.

5 

Options granted under the terms and conditions of the Global NXP Stock Option Program 2014/15 on October 23, 2014. The optionsoption vested in equal installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversary of the date of grant.

36 

Options granted under the terms and conditions of the Global NXP Stock Option Program 2015/16 on October 29, 2015. The optionsoption vested in equal installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversary of the date of grant.

4 

Options granted under the terms and conditions of the Global NXP Stock Option Program 2015/16 on February 4, 2016. The options vested in equal installments on October 29, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019.

5

Options granted under the terms and conditions of the Global NXP Stock Option Program 2011/12 on November 1, 2011. The options vested in equal installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversary of the date of grant.

6

Options granted under the terms and conditions of the Global NXP Stock Option Program 2012/13 on October 25, 2012. The options vested in equal installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversary of the date of grant.

7

Options granted under the terms and conditions of the Global NXP Stock Option Program 2013/14 on October 24, 2013. The options vested in equal installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversary of the date of grant.

8

Options granted under the terms and conditions of the Global NXP Stock Option Program 2015/16 on December 7, 2015. The options vested in equal installments on October 29, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019.

9

Options granted under the terms and conditions of the Freescale Semiconductor, Ltd. 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan on January 5, 2014 and were assumed by NXP on December 7, 2015. The options vested in equal installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversary of the date of grant.

10

Options granted under the terms and conditions of the Freescale Semiconductor, Ltd. 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan on January 5, 2015 and were assumed by NXP on December 7, 2015. The options vested in equal installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversary of the date of grant.

11 

RSUs granted under the terms and conditions of the Restricted Stock Unit Plan 2017/182019 Omnibus Incentive plan on October 26, 2017.29, 2019. The RSUs vestrestricted stock unit vests in equal installments on the first, second and third anniversary of the date of grant, subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date.

128 

RSUs granted under the terms and conditions of the Restricted Stock Unit Plan 2018/192019 Omnibus Incentive plan on July 26, 2018.28, 2020 in connection with Mr. Sievers promotion. The RSUs vestrestricted stock unit vests in equal installments on the first, second and third anniversary of the date of grant, subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date.

139

RSUs granted under the terms and conditions of the 2019 Omnibus Incentive plan on October 27, 2020. The restricted stock unit vests in equal installments on the first, second and third anniversary of the date of grant, subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date.

10

RSUs granted under the terms and conditions of the 2019 Omnibus Incentive plan on November 2, 2021. The restricted stock unit vests in equal installments on the first, second and third anniversary of the date of grant, subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date.

11

RSUs granted under the terms and conditions of the 2019 Omnibus Incentive plan on August 3, 2021 as a new hire grant to Mr. Micallef. The restricted stock unit vests in equal installments on the first, second and third anniversary of the date of grant, subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date.

12 

PSUs granted under the terms and conditions of the Performance Stock Unit Plan 2015/162019 Omnibus Incentive plan on October 29, 2015. Subject to the achievement of the applicable performance metrics, the PSUs vest in equal installments on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of October 29, 2015. Performance measures were not achieved in each of the four years ending as of October 29, 2019. There is an additional vesting possibility of 100% of the unvested PSU’s subject to achieving the full compounding EBIT growth performance under the plan by the fifth anniversary of October 29, 2015 and also subject to continued employment through such date. As a result, the amounts shown in respect to these PSUs are at the target level of performance. The performance results and vesting amounts will be determined at the end of this performance period and will be certified by or on behalf of the Board.

14

PSUs granted under the terms and conditions of the Performance Stock Unit Plan 2015/16 on February 4, 2016. Subject to the achievement of the applicable performance metrics, the PSUs vest in equal installments on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of October 29, 2015. Performance measures were not achieved in each of the four years ending as of October 29, 2019. There is an additional vesting possibility of 100% of the unvested PSUs, subject to achieving the full compounding EBIT growth performance under the plan by the fifth anniversary of October 29, 2015 and also subject to continued employment through such date. As a result, the amounts shown in respect of these PSUs are at the target level of performance. The performance results and vesting amounts will be determined at the end of this performance period and will be certified by or on behalf of the Board.

15

PSUs granted under the terms and conditions of Performance Stock Unit Plan 2018/19 on July 26, 2018. These awards vest 100% on the third anniversary of the date of grant subject to performance achievement based on relative TSR compared to a peer group of companies and also subject to continued employment through such date.the Peer Group. In accordance with SEC requirements, as results as of December 31, 20192021 indicate achievement between targetthreshold and maximumtarget performance, the amounts reflected above are the maximumtarget amounts. Based on actual performance as of December 31, 2021, the performance would be approximately 74% of target resulting in a vesting of 29,304, 1,530, 11,271 and 13,525 shares for Messrs. Sievers, Betz, Owen and Kelly, respectively and 9,017 shares for Ms. Wuamett. After the end of the performance period, NXP’s TSR will be compared to those of the peers pursuant to the Relative TSR performance and payout scale to determine the level of vesting, which will be certified by or on behalf of the Board.

1613 

PSUs granted under the terms and conditions of 2019 Omnibus Incentive plan on October 29, 2019. These awards vestJuly 28, 2020 in connection with Mr. Sievers’s promotion. This award vests 100% on the third anniversary of the date of grant,October 28, 2022 subject to performance achievement based on relative TSR compared the Peer Group. Maxim Integrated Products was part of the peer group. Upon the completion of the acquisition of Maxim Integrated Products acquisition by Analog Devices, the Committee determined to allow the period of time in the program to be a peer group of companies and also subject to continued employment through such date.determining factor for the performance awards granted. In accordance with SEC requirements, as results as of December 31, 20192021 indicate achievement between targetthreshold and maximumtarget performance, the amounts reflected hereabove are the maximumtarget amounts. Based on actual performance as of December 31, 2021, the performance would be at approximately 74% of target resulting in a vesting of 13,427 shares. After the end of the performance period, NXP’s TSR will be compared to those of the peers pursuant to the Relative TSR performance and payout scale to determine the level of vesting, which will be certified by or on behalf of the Board.

1714 

RSUsPSUs granted under the terms and conditions of the 2019 Omnibus Incentive plan on October 29, 2019. The RSUs27, 2020. These awards vest in equal installments100% on October 26, 2023 subject to performance achievement based on relative TSR compared to the first, second and third anniversaryPeer Group. Maxim Integrated Products was part of the datepeer group. Upon the completion of grant,the acquisition of Maxim Integrated Products acquisition by Analog Devices, the Committee determined to allow the period of time in the program to be a determining factor for the performance awards granted. In accordance with SEC requirements, as results indicate achievement between threshold and target performance, the amounts reflected above are the target amounts. Based on actual performance as of December 31, 2021, the performance would be approximately 95% of target resulting in a vesting of 54,753, 1,867, 12,445 and 14,933 shares for Messrs. Sievers, Betz, Owen and Kelly, respectively and 10,951 shares for Ms. Wuamett. After the end of the performance period, NXP’s TSR will be compared to those of the peers pursuant to the Relative TSR performance and payout scale to determine the level of vesting, which will be certified by or on behalf of the Board.

15

PSUs granted under the terms and conditions of 2019 Omnibus Incentive plan on November 2, 2021. These awards vest 100% on November 1, 2024 subject to continued employment throughperformance achievement based on relative TSR compared to the applicablePeer Group. Maxim Integrated Products will be excluded from the calculation of relative total shareholder return since its acquisition occurred prior to the start of the performance period. In accordance with SEC requirements, as results indicate achievement between threshold and target performance, the amounts reflected above are the target amounts. Based on actual performance as of December 31, 2021, the performance would be approximately 92% of target resulting in a vesting date.of 43,698, 7,804, 5,931, 7,804 shares for Messrs. Sievers, Betz, Micallef and Owen respectively and 6,867 shares for Ms. Wuamett. After the end of the performance period, NXP’s TSR will be compared to those of the peers pursuant to the Relative TSR performance and payout scale to determine the level of vesting, which will be certified by or on behalf of the Board.

 

5470


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

The following table shows the value realized for stock options that were exercised and restricted stock unit and performance stock unit awards vested during 2019.2021.

 

Name Option Awards Stock Awards  Option Awards Stock Awards 

Number of Shares

Acquired on Exercise

(#)

 

Value Realized

on Exercise

($)(1)

 

Number of Shares

Acquired on Vesting

(#)

 

Value Realized

on Vesting

($)(2)

 

Number of Shares

acquired on exercise

(#)

 

Value Realized

on exercise

($)(1)

 

Number of shares

acquired on vesting

(#)

 

Value Realized

on vesting

($)(2)

 
Richard Clemmer       152,157  15,842,930 
Kurt Sievers       43,930  4,562,294  35,886  4,370,315  242,171  49,612,289 
William Betz 2,529  317,324  11,533  2,354,640 
Andrew Micallef            
Stephen Owen       83,033  17,028,058 
Jennifer Wuamett       71,088  14,578,693 
Peter Kelly       30,497  3,182,142        123,332  25,300,812 
Steve Owen 32,255  1,112,300  22,250  2,324,538 
David Reed       21,686  2,225,995 

 

1 

The dollar amounts shown above for option awards are determinedvalue realized is calculated by multiplying (i) the number of exercised common shares acquired under the vested option awardexercise by (ii) the difference between the salemarket price of the Company’s common shares onat the datetime of exercise and the exercise price of the options.

2 

Amounts representThe value realized is calculated by multiplying (i) the dollar valuenumber of shares released upon the RSU or PSU award vesting based onby (ii) the closing price of ourthe Company’s common stockshares on the date vested for the grants made under the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan or the day prior to the vest date, or the previous business day if the market was closed on the day prior to the vest date. This amount includes the restricted share units and performance share units granted in previous years that vested for Restricted Stock Unit plans 2016/17, 2017/18 and/or 2018/19.in 2021 according to the terms and conditions of the applicable equity award agreements including performance share units granted on July 26, 2018 which vested in 2021 at a 135% achievement realization.

Pension Benefits

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the potential benefits to Mr. Sievers as of December 31, 2019.2021. No other NEO participates in a Company-sponsored defined benefit pension plan.

 

Name

  Plan Name   

Number of Years

Credited Service

(#)

   

Present Value of

Accumulated

Benefit

($)

   

Payments During

Last Fiscal Year

($)

   Plan Name  

Number of Years

Credited Service

(#)

   

Present Value of

Accumulated

Benefit

($)

   

Payments During

Last Fiscal Year

($)

 

Kurt Sievers

   Germany DBP    21    4,254,270       Germany DBP   23   $ 6,206,265     

In connection with Mr. Sievers is an employee ofSievers’ employment by our German subsidiary, NXP Semiconductors Germany GmbH, andhe participates in the Defined Benefit Plan offered throughby that subsidiary (the “Germany DBP”). This Germany DBP is closed to new employees but was available to all eligible employees of that subsidiary until December 31, 2006. The value in this table has been converted from Euros using the rate of 1.1818, the average euro to U.S. dollars using a 1.1210 conversion rate.dollar conversation rate for 2021.

Under the Germany DBP, participants receive notional contributions that are credited to their personal pension accounts in an amount of 11% of monthly base salary in excess of a calculated social security contribution ceiling that does not factor in the 2003 exceptional adjustment step (leading to a 20192021 ceiling value of6,000)6,350/month), less the additional contribution paid by the employer in the staff pension insurance. Contributions and returns on investments accumulated at retirement (normal retirement age is defined as between 60 – 67) are converted into an annuity based on fixed standard actuarial factors as mentioned in the plan rules. The Germany DBP also provides for certain disability, widow(er) and orphan beneficiary pension benefits.

In calculating the amounts shown in the column titled “Present Value of Accumulated Benefit” in the table above, we calculated the amounts reflected for Mr. Sievers in accordance with ASC 715 using the following assumptions: a calculation date of December 31, 2019,2021, a 1.10%1.20% discount rate, a 1.25%1.75% pension increase rate, retirement occurring at age 63, and applicability of the “Heubeck-Richttafeln 2018 G” mortality table.

71


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control

The following table shows the estimated value of potential payments that each NEO would be entitled to receive upon termination of employment in connection with specific events. The amounts shown below assume that the termination of employment or change of control occurred on December 31, 2019.2021. Where benefits are based on the market value of NXP’s common stock, the table below uses the closing price of NXP’s common stock as reported on the Nasdaq on December 31, 20192021 ($127.26227.78 per share). To the extent applicable, the terms and conditions of our employment, change of control and severance agreements with our NEOs, are discussed above under “Employment Arrangements of Named Executive Officers” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Key Policies and Practices; Change of Control.”

55


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

Amounts shown below are in USD and do not include (i) benefits earned during the term of the NEO’s employment that are available to all benefit-eligible salaried employees, (ii) the value of vested equity awards and (iii) the value of retirement benefits that are reported in the tables above.

 

Name Payments Involuntary
Separation /
Termination at
the
Convenience of
the Company /
Separation due
to Disability(1)
 Death(2) Change of
Control with
Termination
within
12 months(3)
 Retirement(4) Involuntary
Termination
for Cause or
Voluntary
Resignation(5)
  Payment Type Involuntary
Separation /
Termination at the
Convenience of
the Company(1)
 Death(2) Disability(3) Change of
Control with
Termination
within
12 months(4)
 Retirement(5) Involuntary
Termination
for Cause or
Voluntary
Resignation(6)
 
Richard Clemmer Equity Related Payments 60,699,301  159,229,438  159,229,438  1,491,055  0 
Kurt Sievers Equity Related Payments 16,207,914  43,032,881  16,207,914  43,032,881  0  0 
 Cash Payments 5,695,390  3,331,790  5,695,390  9,240,790  0  0 
 Total 21,903,304  46,364,671  21,903,304  52,273,671  0  0 
William Betz Equity Related Payments 862,375  3,835,360  862,375  3,835,360  0  0 
 Cash Payments 2,054,595  2,054,595  6,726,000  0   0  Cash Payments 810,000  360,000  360,000  1,980,000  0  0 
 Benefits Continuation  0   0   25,059   0   0  Benefits Continuation 0  0  0  21,125  0  0 
 Total 62,753,896  161,284,033  166,027,449  1,491,055  0  Total 1,672,375  4,195,360  1,222,375  5,836,485  0  0 
Kurt Sievers Equity Related Payments 20,382,046  51,027,279  53,903,737  0  0 
Andrew Micallef Equity Related Payments 410,460  3,061,591  410,460  3,061,591  0  0 
 Cash Payments 988,105  488,105  488,105  2,288,105  0  0 
 Benefits Continuation 0  0  0  21,425  0   
 Total 1,398,565  3,549,696  898,565  5,371,121  0  0 
Stephen Owen Equity Related Payments 3,942,644  9,359,480  3,942,644  9,359,480  3,942,644  0 
 Cash Payments 1,756,888  799,630  1,756,888  2,714,146  799,630  0 
 Total 5,699,532  10,159,110  5,699,532  12,073,626  4,742,274  0 
Jennifer Wuamett Equity Related Payments 3,291,877  7,991,206  3,291,877  7,991,206  1,780,101  0 
 Cash Payments 1,289,354  774,354  774,354  2,628,354  0  0 
 Cash Payments  1,490,930   0   2,981,860   0   0  Benefits Continuation 0  0  0  21,910  0  0 
 Total 21,872,976  51,027,279  56,885,597  0  0  Total 4,581,231  8,765,560  4,066,231  10,641,470  1,780,101  0 
Peter Kelly Equity Related Payments 10,660,005  26,650,700  29,265,639  298,196  0  Equity Related Payments 4,514,827  8,105,779  4,514,827  8,105,779  4,514,827  0 
 Cash Payments 1,500,000  0  3,000,000  0  0  Cash Payments 2,909,625  1,409,625  2,909,625  4,409,625  1,409,625  0 
 Benefits Continuation  0   0   13,419   0   0  Benefits Continuation 0  0  0  15,453  0  0 
 Total 12,160,005  26,650,700  32,279,058  298,196  0  Total 7,424,452  9,515,404  7,424,452  12,530,857  5,924,452  0 
Stephen Owen Equity Related Payments 7,156,318  18,594,715  20,425,222  248,488  0 
 Cash Payments  1,050,000   0   1,816,020   0   0 
 Total 8,206,318  18,594,715  22,241,242  248,488  0 
David Reed Equity Related Payments 6,119,730  15,745,890  17,073,848  198,780  0 
 Cash Payments 0  0  1,890,000  0  0 
 Benefits Continuation  0   0   11,871   0   0 
 Total 6,119,730  15,745,890  18,975,719  198,780  0 

 

1 

In the event of an involuntary separation or termination at the convenience of the Company (other than for cause, as defined in the applicable employment agreement and equity plan or award agreement) as well as separation due to disability,, estimated value of payments includes the following:

Cash Payments:Payments: All NEOs would receive the 2021 AIP payment earned. Amount for Mr. Clemmer representsSievers also includes two times his gross annual base salary as specified in the valueSecondment Addendum, which is subject to signing a general release of salary payments until the end of his employment agreement in July 2021;claims; amount for Messrs. Sievers andMr. Owen representsalso includes an estimate of what the Company would be required to pay to the executive per the local labourlabor laws as specified in their respective employment agreement; amount for Messrs. Betz and Micallef and Ms. Wuamett also includes one times gross annual base salary as specified in their employment agreement, which is subject to signing a general release of claims in favor of NXP; amount for Mr. Kelly representsalso includes one times gross annual base salary and target annual AIP payment as specified in his employment agreement, which is subject to signing a general release of claims in favor of NXP.

Equity Related Payments:Payments:

RSUs:RSUs: Amounts represent the value of the accelerated vesting of the 20182019, 2020 and 20192021 RSU awards prorated from the grant date to termination date as per the terms of the equity award documents.

PSUs:PSUs: Amounts represent the value of the 20182019, 2020 and 20192021 PSU awards prorated from the grant date to termination date as per the terms of the equity award documents using the share delivery factor based on actual performance results as of December 31, 2019—1.822021—74% for the 2018 PSUs and 1.40 2019 PSUs; 95%

72


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

for the 20192020 PSUs; and 92% for 2021 PSUs. The prorated portion of the PSUs would not be delivered until the PSUs’ original vesting date (as stated in the applicable equity award agreement) and is subject to the final share delivery factor based on the achievement and certification by or on behalf of the Board of the relevant performance goals during the award’s original performance period.

2 

In the event of death while still employed by NXP, estimated value of payments includes the following:

Cash Payments: Amount for Mr. Clemmer representsPayments: All NEOs would receive the value of salary payments until the end of his employment agreement in July 2021. No cash payments would be made to other NEOs2021 AIP payment earned.

Equity Related Payments:Payments:

Effective August 30, 2018, the Nominating and Compensation Committee of NXP, approved a death benefit for members of NXP’s Management Team (“MT”), which includes the NEOs, whereby, unless otherwise provided in a separate employment agreement, in the event of death of a MT member while employed at NXP, all outstanding and unvested equity awards at the time of death will vest as soon as administratively practicable thereafter, except that in the case of PSU awards, such vesting will be subject to the performance targets being met.

RSUs:RSUs: Amounts represent the value of the accelerated vesting of the 2017, 20182019, 2020 and 20192021 RSU awards.

PSUs:PSUs: Amounts represent the value of the 20182019, 2020 and 20192021 PSU awards as per the terms of the equity award documents using the share delivery factor based on actual performance results as of December 31, 2019—1.822021—74% for the 2018 PSUs and 1.402019 PSUs; 95% for the 20192020 PSUs; and 92% for 2021 PSUs. The PSUs would not be delivered until the PSUs’ original vesting date (as stated in the applicable equity award agreement) and is subject to the final share delivery factor based on the achievement and certification by or on behalf of the Board of the relevant performance goals during the award’s original performance period. In addition, Mr. Clemmer’s amount includes the value of the 2015 and 2016 PSUs granted to him at target.

56


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

3 

In the event of a termination within 12 months following a change of control ordisability while still employed by the NEO for good reason,NXP, estimated value of payments includes the following (amounts assume that both the change of control and termination occur on December 31, 2019):following:

Cash Payments: Amounts representPayments: All NEOs would receive the 2021 AIP payment earned. Amount for Mr. Sievers also includes two times his gross annual base salary as specified in the Secondment Addendum, which is subject to signing a general release of claims; amount for Mr. Owen also includes an estimate of what the Company would be required to pay to the executive per the local labor laws as specified in their respective employment agreement; no additional payment would be made for Messrs. Betz and Micallef and Ms. Wuamett amount for Mr. Kelly represents one times gross annual base salary and two times target annual AIP payment for each NEO as specified in the Changehis employment agreement, which is subject to signing a general release of Control Severance Policy.claims in favor of NXP.

Equity Related Payments:Payments:

RSUs:RSUs: Amounts represent the value of the accelerated vesting of the 2017, 20182019, 2020 and 2019 RSU awards as per the terms of the equity award documents.

PSUs: Amounts represent the value of the 2015, 2016 (for Mr. Clemmer only), 2018 and 2019 PSU awards as per the terms of the equity award documents. For the 2019 amounts represent the value of the PSUs using the share delivery factor based on actual performance results as of December��31, 2019—1.82 for the 2018 PSUs and 1.40 for the 2019 PSUs. In the case of a change of control, the performance period would end effective as of the date of the change of control and the share delivery factor would be determined as of that date, subject to determination and certification by or on behalf of the Board. For the 2015 and 2016 PSU awards, amount represents the value of the target number of shares awarded.

Benefits Continuation: Amounts represent an approximate cost for benefits continuation as specified in the Change of Control Severance Policy for Messrs. Clemmer, Kelly and Reed, who are US citizens or residents.

4

In the case of retirement, as defined in the 2019 equity award agreements, estimated value of payments includes the following (only for Messrs. Clemmer, Kelly, Owen and Reed who would be are eligible for ‘retirement’ as of December 31, 2019):

Equity Related Payments:

Only the 2019 equity award agreements contain provisions related to prorated awards in retirement.

RSUs: Amounts represent the value of the accelerated vesting of the 20192021 RSU awards prorated from the grant date to termination date as per the terms of the equity award documents.

PSUs:PSUs: Amounts represent the value of the 2019, PSUs2020 and 2021 PSU awards prorated from the grant date to termination date as per the terms of the equity award documents using the share delivery factor based on actual performance results as of December 31, 2021—74% for the 2019 or 1.40.PSUs; 95% for the 2020 PSUs; and 92% for 2021 PSUs. The prorated portion of the PSUs would not be delivered until the PSUs’ original vesting date (as stated in the applicable equity award agreement) and is subject to the final share delivery factor based on the achievement and certification by or on behalf of the Board of the relevant performance goals during the award’s original performance period.

4

In the event of a termination within 12 months following a change of control either by the Company or by the NEO for good reason, in either case not under certain conditions involving misconduct (also known as double trigger), estimated value of payments includes the following (amounts assume that both the change of control and termination occur on December 31, 2021):

Cash Payments: All NEOs would receive the 2021 AIP payment earned. Amounts also include two times gross annual base salary and two times target annual AIP payment for each NEO as specified in the Change of Control Severance Policy.

Equity Related Payments:

RSUs: Amounts represent the value of the accelerated vesting of the 2019, 2020 and 2021 RSU awards as per the terms of the equity award documents.

PSUs: Amounts represent the value of the 2019, 2020 and 2021 PSU awards as per the terms of the equity award documents using the share delivery factor based on actual performance results as of December 31, 2021—74% for the 2019 PSUs; 95% for the 2020 PSUs; and 92% for 2021 PSUs. In the case of a change of control, the performance period would end effective as of the date of the change of control, assumed here as December 31, 2021, and the share delivery factor would be determined as of that date, subject to determination and certification by or on behalf of the Board.

Benefits Continuation: Amounts represent an approximate cost for benefits continuation as specified in the Change of Control Severance Policy for Messrs. Betz, Micallef and Kelly and Ms. Wuamett, who are US citizens or residents.

5

In the case of retirement, as defined in the 2019, 2020 and 2021 equity award agreements and described below, estimated value of payments includes the following (only for Messrs. Owen and Kelly, Owen and Ms. Wuamett in the case of the 2019 equity awards who would be are eligible for ‘retirement’ as of December 31, 2021):

Cash Payments: Messrs. Owen and Kelly would receive the amount of their 2021 AIP payment.

Equity Related Payments:

RSUs: Amounts represent the value of the accelerated vesting of the 2019, 2020 and 2021 RSU awards prorated from the grant date to termination date as per the terms of the equity award documents.

PSUs: Amounts represent the value of the 2019, 2020 and 2021 PSU awards prorated from the grant date to termination date as per the terms of the equity award documents using the share delivery factor based on actual performance results as of December 31, 2021—74% for the 2019 PSUs; 95% for the 2020 PSUs; and 92% for 2021 PSUs. The prorated portion of the PSUs would not be delivered until the PSUs’ original vesting date (as stated in the applicable equity award agreement) and is subject to the final share delivery factor based on the achievement and certification by or on behalf of the Board of the relevant performance goals during the award’s original performance period.

Retirement is generally defined in the 2019 equity award agreements as the participant’s termination of employment where a participant is eligible to receive an immediate (early) retirement benefit under a local (early) retirement plan. If the participant is residing in the U.S. or absent local regulations or customs then retirement is defined as the participant’s termination of employment where the participant has attained both five (5) years of service with NXP and age fifty-five (55).

Retirement is defined in the 2020 and 2021 equity award agreements and the 2021 AIP as the participant’s termination of employment where the participant has attained both five (5) years of service with NXP and age sixty (60).

6 

All unvested equity will be cancelled. No cash payments would be made.

73


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

Our equity awards agreements containnon-solicitation andnon-competition provisions that are effective for 12 months following the termination of employment. Except as described above, unvested equity awards lapse if a participant’s employment terminates and such participant is no longer employed by NXP. If there is a violation by the participant of any provisions contained in the applicable equity award, plan or grant letter, then the equity award lapses on the date of such violation. The 2019 equity award agreements also require participants to execute and deliver a general release of claims upon termination.

CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure

The annual total compensation for the median employee of NXP (other than our Chief Executive Officer) in 20192021 was $50,294.$50,138 . The annual total compensation for our Chief Executive Officer was $20,558,002.$20,911,892. We used the total compensation for Mr. Sievers, our CEO, as reported in the 2021 Summary Compensation Table. Based on this information, the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all employeesthe median employee was approximately 409:1417:1.

We have a global workforce operating in 33over 30 countries. The countries that have predominantly manufacturing activities are in China, Malaysia, Taiwan and Thailand with total headcount of 14,29715,826 or approximately 51% of our global population. These four countries have an average headcount of 3,5733,957 and an average base pay of $21,483$20,985 as compared to a global average of $54,917. Excluding manufacturing employees, our average base pay is over $83,600.$83,809 excluding those locations.

We have determined a new median employee in 2021. To identify the median employee, we used the following methodology:

 

We identified our median employee by considering an employee population as of December 31, 20192021

 

To determine the median employee, we used a consistently applied compensation measure that included the total of annual base pay, local allowances, AIP Bonus at target or 20192021 target sales incentive plan and the approved value of the annual equity awards granted during 2019.2021

 

We applied the exchange rate we utilize in our HR system as of December 31, 20192021 which is the average monthly rate for the full year

 

Salaries were annualized for all employees who were hired or were on an unpaid leave during the fiscal year

To determine the pay ratio:

 

We calculated the compensation elements for the median employee in accordance with the requirements of item 402(c)(2)(x) of the SEC’s RegulationS-K.S-K

 

57For the median employee’s total compensation we used a reasonable estimate of pension benefits.

The median employee resides in the United States in a fabrication equipment operator role.

Human Resources and Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2021, Mr. Smitham (Chair), Sir Peter Bonfield, Ms. Clayton and Olving and Mr. Sundström served on the Human Resources and Compensation Committee. Other than Mr. Sundström, none of the members of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee is or has been an executive officer or employee of NXP. Mr. Sundström held the role as CFO of NXP Semiconductors N.V. (2008–2012). None of our executive officers serves on the board of directors or compensation committee of a company which has an executive officer who serves on our Board or Human Resources and Compensation Committee.

74


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (continued)

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table summarizes NXP’s compensation plan information (including individual compensation arrangements) as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.2021.

 

Plan Category  Number of
securities to be issued
upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and
rights (a)
 Weighted-
average
exercise price of
outstanding
options,
warrants
and rights ($)(b)1
   Number of
securities remaining
available for future
issuance under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in
column (a))(c)
   Number of
securities to be issued
upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and
rights (a)
 Weighted-
average
exercise price of
outstanding
options,
warrants
and rights ($)(b)1
   Number of
securities remaining
available for future
issuance under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in
column (a)(c))
 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders   11,092,9722  52.08    40,329,5643    6,845,4972  56.09    34,124,2313 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders                      
Total   11,092,972  52.08    40,329,564    6,845,497  56.09    34,124,231 

 

1. 

Shares of common stock issuable upon vesting of RSU and PSU awards have been excluded from the calculation of the weighted average exercise price.

2. 

Represents 1,202,909458,212 shares of common stock subject to outstanding stock options and 9,890,0636,387,285 shares of common stock that may be issued upon vesting of outstanding RSU and PSU awards (PSU awards are assumed at maximum performance level), in each case pursuant to equity awards issued under the Company’s equity compensation plans.

3. 

Includes 29,210,19623,774,851 shares of common stock available for future issuance under the NXP 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan and 11,119,36810,349,380 shares of common stock available for future issuance under NXP’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

 

58


ITEM 12:NON-BINDING, ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE SHAREHOLDER ADVISORY VOTES ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

As described in Item 11 above, NXP is required to include an advisory resolution subject to anon-binding, advisory shareholder“say-on-pay” vote on the executive compensation program for our Named Executive Officers. Section 14A of the Exchange Act requires that, at least once every six years, we ask our shareholders to vote, on anon-binding, advisory basis, to determine whether shareholder advisory votes to approve our Named Executive Officers’ compensation should occur every one, two or three years. Shareholders may also abstain from voting.

Our Board has determined that an annualsay-on-pay vote is appropriate for NXP and its shareholders at this time, and, therefore, our Board recommends that you vote for aone-year interval for the advisorysay-on-pay vote.

Like thenon-binding, advisorysay-on-pay vote on Item 11, this Item 12 is advisory and will not be binding on NXP. However, our Compensation Committee and Board will review the results of the vote and will consider shareholders’ views in determining the frequency of future advisorysay-on-pay votes. Thenon-binding, advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation is a plurality vote, which means that NXP will consider shareholders to have expressed anon-binding preference for the option presented to shareholders that receives the greatest number of votes cast.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT ANON-BINDING, ADVISORY VOTE ON“SAY-ON-PAY” BE HELD ANNUALLY AND THAT SHAREHOLDERS SELECT “1 YEAR” WHEN VOTING ON THIS PROPOSAL.

5975


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Related Party Transactions

There arewere no transactions or series of similar transactions, since January 1, 2019,2021, to which we were a party or will be a party other than compensation arrangements which are described under “Executive Compensation,” in which:

 

the amountsamount involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000; and

 

a director or director nominee, executive officer, holder of more than 5% of our common shares or any immediate family member of their immediate familya director, director nominee or executive officer had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

Statement of Policy Regarding Transactions with Related Persons

The Board has adopted a written policy that requires our Nominating and GovernanceAudit Committee to review and approve or ratify all related party transactions that involve a value of $120,000 or more (excluding employment relationships). The Human Resources and Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving or ratifying any employment relationship with a related party that involves compensation of $120,000 or more. In determining whether to approve or ratify, as applicable, a related party transaction, these committees are guided by our Code of Conduct which, among other things, requires that business decisions and actions be based on the best interests of NXP and not be motivated by personal considerations or relationships.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with NXP’s management and its independent auditor, KPMG.Ernst & Young Accountants LLP (“E&Y”). The Audit Committee has also discussed with KPMGE&Y the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, “Communications with Audit Committees,” issued bythe applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). and the SEC. In addition, KPMGE&Y provided the Audit Committee with the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee discussed with KPMGE&Y its independence from NXP and its management. The Audit Committee has also considered whether the provision of othernon-audit services by KPMGE&Y to NXP is compatible with the auditors’ independence and has concluded that it is.

In reliance on these reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, the 20192021 Statutory Annual Accounts and the inclusion of the audited financial statements in NXP’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, for filing with the SEC.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Julie Southern, Chair

Jasmin Staiblin

Karl-Henrik Sundström

 

6076


THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

At the Company’s 2020 Annual General Meeting the shareholders approved the Board’s recommendation of E&Y as its independent registered public accounting firm, as referred to in Article 32 of the Company’s Articles of Association, for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2020 through December 31, 2022. The next approval of our auditor will be voted on by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting in 2023.

Representatives of E&Y will participate in the 2022 AGM, will be available to respond to appropriate questions from our stockholders and may make a statement if they desire to do so.

The aggregate fees for professional services rendered by E&Y to NXP were $6.4 million for 2021 and $5.3 million for 2020.

Auditors’ Fees

The following table summarizes the fees for professional audit services provided by E&Y for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 as well as the fees billed for other services rendered by E&Y during these periods.

   Year Ended December 31, 
Fees  

2021

(in millions)

   

2020

(in millions)

 
Audit Fees(1)  $5.9   $4.4 
Audit-Related Fees(2)   0.4    0.2 
Tax Fees(3)   0.1    0.2 
All Other Fees(4)       0.5 
Total Fees  $6.4   $5.3 

(1)

Audit fees relate to professional services rendered in connection with the audit of NXP’s annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, quarterly review of financial statements, and audit services provided in connection with other statutory and regulatory filings

(2)

Audit-related fees relate to professional services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of NXP’s financial statements.

(3)

Tax fees relate to tax compliance services, including the preparation of original and amended tax returns and claims for refund, and other tax advice and tax planning services, including assistance with transfer pricing documentation.

(4)

All other fees relate all other services provided, including permissible people advisory services.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies

The Audit Committee has adopted rules for the pre-approval by the Audit Committee of all services to be provided by the external auditor. Proposed services may be pre-approved at the beginning of the year by the Audit Committee (annual pre-approval) or may be pre-approved during the year in respect of a particular engagement (specific pre-approval). The pre-approval is based on a detailed, itemized list of services to be provided, designed to ensure that there is no management discretion in determining whether a service has been approved and to ensure the Audit Committee is informed of each service it is pre-approving. Unless covered by the pre-approved services, each proposed service requires specific pre-approval during the year. Any pre-approved services where the fee for the engagement is expected to exceed pre-approved cost levels or budgeted amounts will also require specific pre-approval. During 2021, there were no services provided to the Company by the external auditors which were not pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

In 2021, the external auditor attended all formal meetings of the Audit Committee. The findings of the external auditor, the audit approach and the risk analysis are also discussed at these meetings. The external auditor also refers in its reporting to the Audit Committee of the Board to the financial reporting risks and issues that were identified during the audit, internal control matters, and any other matters, as appropriate, requiring communication under the auditing standards generally accepted in The Netherlands and the United States.

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A) REPORTS

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of such securities. To our knowledge, based solely on a review of such reports filed with the SEC and written representations that no other reports were required during 2021, we believe that all required reports were timely filed, except for, due to an administrative error, two Form 5s: one for Karl-Henrik Sundström to report a small acquisition of shares acquired in a dividend reinvestment plan administered by his broker and one for Kenneth Goldman to report a gift of shares.

77


FUTURE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS FOR THE 20212023 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING

Any shareholder desiring to present a resolution for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement for the 20212023 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders must deliver such resolution to the board of directors at the address below no later than [    ]], 2022 (120 days before the anniversary date of the release of this proxy)proxy statement). Only those resolutions that comply with the requirements of Rule14a-8 under the Exchange Act will be included in the Company’s proxy statement for the 20212023 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders.

Shareholders may present resolutions that are proper subjects for consideration at an annual meeting, even if the resolution is not submitted by the deadline for inclusion in the proxy statement. In order for resolutions of shareholders made outside of Rule14a-8 under the Exchange Act to be considered “timely” within the meaning of Rule14a-4(c) under the Exchange Act with respect to the 20212023 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, such resolutions must be received by the Board at the address below by [    ].], 2023. Shareholder resolutions should be sent to NXP’s Secretary at NXP Semiconductors N.V., High Tech Campus 60, 5656 AG, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, Attention: Secretary.

In addition, our articles of association provide that one or more holders of shares representing solely or jointly at least such part of the issued share capital as required by Dutch corporate law, may present a resolution for consideration at the 20212023 Annual General Meeting of Shareholder by delivering such resolution to the boardBoard of directorsDirectors at the address below no later than sixty days prior to the date of the 20212023 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders. Notice of such matter will be placed on the notice convening the 20212023 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders.

OTHER MATTERS

We have provided to you with this proxy statement a copy of our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, including audited financial statements. Copies of these materials are also available online through the SEC at www.sec.gov. We may satisfy SEC rules regarding delivery of proxy materials, including this proxy statement the Notice and the Annual Report on Form10-K, by delivering a single set of proxy materials to an address shared by two or more holders of ordinary shares, unless contrary instructions are received prior to the mailing date. This delivery method can result in meaningful cost savings for us. We undertake to deliver promptly upon written or oral request at the address or phone number below a separate copy of the proxy materials to a shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the proxy materials was delivered. Similarly, if you share an address with another shareholder and have received multiple copies of our proxy materials, you may write or call us at the address or phone number below to request delivery of a single copy of the proxy materials in the future. If you hold ordinary shares and prefer to receive separate copies of the proxy materials either now or in the future, please contact Broadridge at(866) 540-7095 or by writing to Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

Our 20192021 Statutory Annual Report and Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019,2021, including audited financial statements, as filed with the SEC, is available to shareholders free of charge on our Investor Relations website athttp://investors.nxp.com or by writing us at NXP Semiconductors N.V., High Tech Campus 60, 5656 AG, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, Attention: Secretary.

As of the date of this proxy statement, we are not aware of any other matters to be brought before the Annual General Meeting other than those referred to in this proxy statement. However, if any other matters are properly presented for action, in the absence of instructions to the contrary, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote in their discretion the ordinary shares represented by all properly executed proxies.

 

6178


Appendix AAPPENDIX A: Financial Reconciliation—GAAP to non-GAAP (unaudited)

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures (unaudited)

 

($ in millions)

  December 31,
2018
  December 31,
2019
 

Revenue

  $9,407  $8,877 

GAAP gross profit

  $4,851  $4,618 

Purchase Price Accounting (PPA) effects

   (78  (84

Restructuring

   —     (3

Stock-based compensation

   (40  (42

Merger-related costs

   (11  (2

Other incidentals

   —     —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-GAAP gross profit

  $4,980  $4,749 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

GAAP Gross Margin

   51.6  52.0

Non-GAAP Gross Margin

   52.9  53.5

GAAP research and development

  $(1,700 $(1,643

Restructuring

   —     (16

Stock-based compensation

   (133  (141

Merger-related costs

   (24  (7
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-GAAP research and development

  $(1,543 $(1,479
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

GAAP selling, general and administrative

  $(993 $(924

PPA effects

   (8  (9

Restructuring

   (7  (9

Stock-based compensation

   (141  (163

Merger-related costs

   (78  (24

Other incidentals

   (21  (16
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-GAAP selling, general and administrative

  $(738 $(703
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

GAAP amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets

  $(1,449 $(1,435

PPA effects

   (1,449  (1,435
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-GAAP amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets

  $—    $—   
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

GAAP other income (expense)

  $2,001  $25 

Restructuring

   1   —   

Merger-related costs

   1,961   —   

Other incidentals

   39   19 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-GAAP other income (expense)

  $—    $6 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

GAAP operating income (loss)

  $2,710  $641 

PPA effects

   (1,535  (1,528

Restructuring

   (6  (28

Stock-based compensation

   (314  (346

Merger-related costs

   1,848   (33

Other incidentals

   18   3 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-GAAP operating income (loss)

  $2,699  $2,573 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

GAAP operating margin

   28.8  7.2

Non-GAAP operating margin

   28.7  29.0

($ in millions)

Full Year
2021

Revenue

11,063

GAAP gross profit

6,067

PPA effects

(74

Restructuring

Stock-based compensation

(45

Merger-related costs

Other incidentals

(19

Other adjustments

 

Non-GAAP gross profit

6,205

GAAP Gross Margin

54.8

Non-GAAP Gross Margin

56.1

GAAP research and development

(1,936

Restructuring

(1

Stock-based compensation

(165

Merger-related costs

Other incidentals

(2

Non-GAAP research and development

(1,768

GAAP selling, general and administrative

(956

PPA effects

(5

Restructuring

Stock-based compensation

(143

Merger-related costs

Other incidentals

(12

Non-GAAP selling, general and administrative

(796

GAAP amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets

(592

PPA effects

(592

Non-GAAP amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets

GAAP other income (expense)

Non-GAAP other income (expense)

GAAP operating income (loss)

2,583

PPA effects

(671

Restructuring

(1

Stock-based compensation

(353

Merger-related costs

Other incidentals

(33

Other adjustments

Non-GAAP operating income (loss)

3,641

GAAP Operating Margin

23.3

Non-GAAP Operating Margin

32.9

GAAP financial income (expense)

(403

PPA effects

Non-cash interest expense on convertible Notes

Foreign exchange gain (loss) on debt

(1

Gain (loss) on extinguishment of long-term debt

(22

Changes in fair value of warrant liability

Other financial expense

(15

Non-GAAP Financial income (expense)

(365

A-1


Free Cash Flow (unaudited)

($ in millions)

Full Year
2021

Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities

3,077

Net capital expenditures on property, plant and equipment

(766

Non-GAAP free cash flow

2,311

Non-GAAP free cash flow as a percent of Revenue

21

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

In managing NXP’s business on a consolidated basis, management develops an annual operating plan, which is approved by our Board of Directors, using non-GAAP financial measures. In measuring performance against this plan, management considers the actual or potential impacts on these non-GAAP financial measures from actions taken to reduce costs with the goal of increasing our gross margin and operating margin and when assessing appropriate levels of research and development efforts. In addition, management relies upon these non-GAAP financial measures when making decisions about product spending, administrative budgets, and other operating expenses. We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures, when coupled with the GAAP results and the reconciliations to corresponding GAAP financial measures, provide a more complete understanding of the Company’s results of operations and the factors and trends affecting NXP’s business. We believe that they enable investors to perform additional comparisons of our operating results, to assess our liquidity and capital position and to analyze financial performance excluding the effect of expenses unrelated to operations, certain non-cash expenses and share-based compensation expense, which may obscure trends in NXP’s underlying performance. This information also enables investors to compare financial results between periods where certain items may vary independent of business performance, and allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics used by management.

These non-GAAP financial measures are provided in addition to, and not as a substitute for, or superior to, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. The presentation of these and other similar items in NXP’s non-GAAP financial results should not be interpreted as implying that these items are non-recurring, infrequent, or unusual.

The non-GAAP information excludes the amortization of acquisition related intangible assets, the purchase accounting effect on inventory and property, plant and equipment, merger related costs (including integration costs), certain items related to divestitures, share-based compensation expense, restructuring and asset impairment charges, non-cash interest expense on convertible notes, extinguishment of debt, and foreign exchange gains and losses.

Forward-looking Statements

This document includes forward-looking statements which include statements regarding NXP’s business strategy, carbon emissions, energy consumption, water consumption, and other environmental targets, external ESG commitments, and workplace diversity goals as well as any other statements which are not historical facts. By their nature, forward-looking statements are subject to numerous factors, risks and uncertainties that could cause actual outcomes and results to be materially different from those projected. These factors, risks and uncertainties include the following: the duration and spread of the COVID-19 outbreak, its severity, the actions to contain the virus or treat its impact, and how quickly and to what extent normal economic and operating conditions can resume; market demand and semiconductor industry conditions; the ability to successfully introduce new technologies and products; the demand for the goods into which NXP’s products are incorporated; trade disputes between the U.S. and China, potential increase of barriers to international trade and resulting disruptions to NXP’s established supply chains; the ability to generate sufficient cash, raise sufficient capital or refinance corporate debt at or before maturity to meet both NXP’s debt service and research and development and capital investment requirements; the ability to accurately estimate demand and match manufacturing production capacity accordingly or obtain supplies from third-party producers; the potential impact of the outbreak of COVID-19 on NXP’s business, operations, results of operations, financial condition, workforce or the operations or decisions of customers, suppliers or business customers; the

A-2


LOGOaccess to production capacity from third-party outsourcing partners and any events that might affect their business or NXP’s relationship with them including the outbreak of COVID-19 or the requirements to suspend activities with customers or suppliers because of changing import and export regulations; the ability to secure adequate and timely supply of equipment and materials from suppliers; the ability to avoid operational problems and product defects and, if such issues were to arise, to correct them quickly; the ability to form strategic partnerships and joint ventures and to successfully cooperate with alliance partners; the ability to win competitive bid selection processes; the ability to develop products for use in customers’ equipment and products; the ability to successfully hire and retain key management and senior product engineers; and, the ability to maintain good relationships with NXP’s suppliers. In addition, this document contains information concerning the semiconductor industry and NXP’s market and business segments generally, which is forward-looking in nature and is based on a variety of assumptions regarding the ways in which the semiconductor industry and NXP’s market and business segments may develop. NXP has based these assumptions on information currently available, if any one or more of these assumptions turn out to be incorrect, actual results may differ from those predicted. While NXP does not know what impact any such differences may have on its business, if there are such differences, its future results of operations and its financial condition could be materially adversely affected. There can be no assurances that a pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of a contagious diseases, such as COVID-19, will not have a material and adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition in the future. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak to results only as of the initial publication date of this document. Except for any ongoing obligation to disclose material information as required by the United States federal securities laws, NXP does not have any intention or obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements after we distribute this document, whether to reflect any future events or circumstances or otherwise. For a discussion of potential risks and uncertainties, please refer to the risk factors listed in our SEC filings. Copies of our SEC filings are available on our Investor Relations website, www.nxp.com/investor or from the SEC website, www.sec.gov.

A-3


LOGO

SCAN TO VIEW MATERIALS & VOTE w NXP SEMICONDUCTORS N.V. VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above HIGH TECH CAMPUS 60 Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information 5656 AG EINDHOVEN, THE NETHERLANDS up until May 26, 202031, 2022 at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time (10:00 p.m. Central European Time). Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until May 26, 202031, 2022 at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time (10:00 p.m. Central European Time). Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. The proxy card must be received by May 30, 2022. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN PERSON ATTENDANCEBLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: D78473-P71070 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND VOTING Due to the COVID-19 outbreak, in person AGM attendance and voting may be limited. Please check https://investors.nxp.com/annual-general-meeting-2020 for updated information. NXP SEMICONDUCTORS N.V. HIGH TECH CAMPUS 60 5656 AG EINDHOVEN, THE NETHERLANDS D00093-P37036-P36868DATED. DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY NXP SEMICONDUCTORS N.V. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the For Against Abstain following proposals: Abstain Against For 1. Adoption of the 20192021 Statutory Annual Accounts 2. Discharge of the members of the Board for their responsibilities in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 For Against Abstain 5. Authorization of the Board to restrict or exclude pre-emption rights accruing in connection with an issue of shares or grant of rightsresponsibilitiesinthefinancialyearendedDecember31,2021 3a. AppointRe-appoint Kurt Sievers as executive director 3b. Re-appoint Sir Peter Bonfield as non-executive director 6. Authorization of the Board to repurchase ordinary shares 7. Authorization of the Board to cancel ordinary shares held or to be acquired by the Company 3c. Re-appoint Kenneth A. Goldman as non-executive director 8. Appointment of Ernst & Young Accountants LLP as independent auditors for a three-year period, starting with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020 3d. Re-appoint Josef Kaeser as non-executive director 3e. Re-appoint Lena Olving as non-executive director 9. Determination of the remuneration of the members and Chairs of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board 3f. Re-appoint Peter Smitham as non-executive director 3g. Re-appoint Julie Southern as non-executive director 10. Amendment of the Company’s Articles of Association 11. Non-binding, advisory vote to approve Named Executive Officer compensation 3h. Re-appoint Jasmin Staiblin as non-executive director Abstain 3 Years 2 Years 1 Year The Board of Directors recommends you vote 1 YEAR on the following proposal: 3i. Re-appoint Gregory Summe as non-executive director 3j. Re-appoint Karl-Henrik Sundström as non-executive director 12. To recommend, by non-binding vote, the frequency of executive compensation votes 4. Authorization of the Board to issue ordinary shares of the Company and grant rights to acquire ordinary shares For address changes and/5. Authorization of the Board to restrict or comments, please check this box and write them onexclude 3b. Re-appoint Sir Peter Bonfield as non-executive director pre-emption rights accruing in connection with an issue of shares or grant of rights 3c. Re-appoint Annette Clayton as non-executive director 6. Authorization of the back where indicated.Board to repurchase ordinary shares 3d. Re-appoint Anthony Foxx as non-executive director 7. Authorization of the Board to cancel ordinary shares held or to be acquired by the Company 3e. Appoint Chunyuan Gu as non-executive director 8. Non-binding, advisory approval of the Named Executive Officers’ compensation 3f. Re-appoint Lena Olving as non-executive director 3g. Re-appoint Julie Southern as non-executive director 3h. Re-appoint Jasmin Staiblin as non-executive director 3i. Re-appoint Gregory Summe as non-executive director 3j. Re-appoint Karl-Henrik Sundström as non-executive director Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date


LOGOLOGO

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual General Meeting:The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.
D00094-P37036-P36868 D78474-P71070 NXP Semiconductors N.V. Annual General Meeting of Shareholders May 27, 2020 2:June 1, 2022 9:00 PMAM CET This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors The undersigned shareholder(s) hereby appoint(s) Jennifer Wuamett and Jean A. W. Schreurs,Timothy Shelhamer, or either of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint (his/her) substitute, and hereby authorize(s) them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all of the shares of common stock of NXP Semiconductors N.V. that the shareholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders to be held at 2:9:00 PM,AM, Central European Time on May 27, 2020,June 1, 2022, at the Company’s Head Office, High Tech Campus 60, 5656 AG Eindhoven, The Netherlands, and any adjournment or postponement thereof.
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations. Address Changes/Comments: (If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)
(Continued(Continued and to be signed on the other side)